Ulali

You Have the Right to Remain Innocent

Hervorragendes Video über die Tricks der Polizei, wenn du zur Aussage/Befragung oder wie immer die das nennen geladen wirst. Z.B. - dies ist ja die Bananen Republik - mit ihren über 200K Anzeigen wegen, gääähn, Beleidigung.

Erstens, du musst überhaupt nicht erscheinen. Natürlich kannst du dir den Spass gönnen hinzugehen und leierst dann aber nur deinen Namen, Adresse und Geburtsdatum runter und hälst dann absolut die Klappe!!! Aber selbst das Erscheinen kann schon inkriminierend gedeutet werden.

Das Video betrifft natürlich das US Rechtssystem. Dennoch kann eine Menge wertvoller Infos für das Vorgehen in DE extrahiert werden.

Ziemlich zum Schluss werden schlechte, ja katastrophale Verteidiger angesprochen. Aus eigener Erfahrung dachte ich natürlich gleich an Aglaia Muth und Aiko Petersen.

Mr. Duane spricht sehr schnell und es ist immer wieder der typische amerikanische Humor zu finden.

. . . . . . . .

Cato Institute

Law professor James Duane became a viral sensation in 2008 for a lively lecture that explained why people shouldn’t agree to answer questions from the police. In his new book, You Have the Right to Remain Innocent, Duane expands on that presentation, offering a vigorous defense of every citizen’s constitutionally protected right to avoid self-incrimination. By using case histories of innocent persons who were wrongfully imprisoned because of information they gave to police, Duane debunks the claim that “if you haven’t done anything wrong, then you don’t have anything to worry about.” Join us for an informative lecture about the Constitution and how to protect yourself and stay out of trouble with the police.

Must see video on Cato website

There is also this older video

En chanté female cop Nöchel from Munich. The intended body search of my daughter had exactly what deeper purpose?

RE. The confiscation of our IT equipment in October 2015.

File # BY8644-000804-15/7


Chère Mlle Nöchel from the police department in Munich,

Pleasure to have you. I take the liberty to get in touch with you via the intertubes. Reason being that I am just dying to know, particularly as a father of a daughter, what deeper secrets you had in mind to discover when you accompanied two male cops on that auspicious day in October 2015 to have our IT equipment confiscated.

You were obviously charged with the order to frisk my daughter. The daughter of a blogger.

So here is my Q:

- what in particular were you looking for when you intended to frisk my daughter?

Simple Q I believe and if I understand the able-bodied Küsten-Barbie of the Ministry for  Family Affairs correctly, Germany is all gaga about the integration of, ehem, migrants. So in that regard I am having a hard time getting your intentions aligned with those lofty ideals, if you catch my drift. After all, she is just the daughter of a blogger.

At the risk of repeating myself, we intend to send a comprehensive complaint letter covering all three (so far) cases to the ECHR latest by the second week of October. I therefore would kindly ask you for a RSVP, preferably by email, ASAP. Three days or so should do, I guess. You are of course fully entitled to respond in German. I'll do the translate, Chevalier that I am. No answer would be an answer as well, but that goes without saying.

I feel already deeply indebted for your help and consideration.

Grazie,

Courtesy call on Munich police re computer confiscation for planned letter of complaint to the ECHR in Strasbourg

RE. The confiscation of our IT equipment in October 2015.

File # BY8644-000804-15/7

Hello Munich cop Bendig (1),

I just thought I get in touch with you for starters to find out what you were looking for on that day in October 2015 when you barged into the room of my daughter without even knocking? It's just a matter of courtesy, before I table this matter before the German Home Minister, the Minister of Justice, the Ministry of Family Affairs and of course the Minister of Labor, who seems to be verbally challenged, for possible further elaboration what they understand about Free Speech.

Anyway, I do believe you know that daughters are in most instances of the female sex. A man dashing into a room of a female without knocking at the door is, at least where I hail from, considered rude and/or uneducated. But then again, I am not from bucolic Bavaria. Lucky me.

I would appreciate if you could enlighten me, what the urgency was all about. So here are the concise and very basic Qs:

• What were you looking for in her room? After all, I just write a fucking blog.
• Why did you shoot photos of the house and rooms? Again, I just write a fucking blog.

You may by now be wondering as to why I am writing in the English language. The reason is that the official languages at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg are English and French. Unfortunately, my French has graciously degraded over time, kind of gone rusty, ya know, though I am still good at French kisses I've been told. Secondly, it can be read by a far wider audience and I just happen to be a sucker for publicity.

We intend to send a comprehensive complaint letter covering all three (so far) cases to the ECHR latest by the second week of October. I therefore would kindly ask you for a reply, preferably by email, ASAP. Three days or so should do, I guess. You are of course fully entitled to respond in German. I'll do the translate, no sweat. No answer would be an answer as well, but that goes without saying.

I appreciate your help and consideration.

Thank you,

____________
(1) not sure the name is correctly spelled. If not, prego scusi.

German Federal Constitutional Court cool with destroying poor families while high earners are treated with kid gloves.

Imagine appearing at work
 in a red bathrobe

The German Federal Constitutional Court fulfills four functions:

1. Complement the Christian Louboutin shoe line with a fitting outrageous dress.
2. Reward judges who are deemed polically fit.
3. Serve the state with politically supporting judgements.
4. Serve decisions on something they have absofuckinglutely no clue about, like finance and function of a central bank, without looking completely stupid.

When a country like Germany has given up its sovereign currency and is dependent on exports (which have to be competitively priced) it is important to have a dependable source of cheap labor, because without a sovereign currency you can not devalue.

Forcing people into cheap jobs - the number of contract workers is at an all-time high - is one way. Good to know that Germany can also rely on the German Federal Constitutional Court.

Here is a recent decision of the court which ensures that pensioners get even poorer. The German magazine STERN has a good article.

Hartz IV judgment - now poverty is contagious

Even from 615 euro pension is necessary to leave, says the Federal Constitutional Court. Hartz IV destroys the family, for high earners are treated with kid gloves.

Before the state Hartz IV is charged, it forces the support of partners and family - if all live in a household. This is lawful, now decided the Federal Constitutional Court . The ruling is not surprising - it blesses from only the current practice. Why is?

Sued a man who had less than 21 year old Hartz IV was because the office imputing the disability pension of his father.A right to maintenance from the father because of unemployment, he has not. Nevertheless, the dad has to pay.Paradox. 

Earlier in the former West Germany, it was different: For decades, the state had a right to maintenance of the children claimed to save as welfare at the expense of parents. But the prevailing legal opinion changed. Unemployment is a social problem that they could not pass on to the parents, said the new tenor. 

Unlimited use

With the Agenda 2010 was the government under Chancellor Gerhard Schröder (SPD) 2005 clever, but perfidious rotation, the maintenance obligation in theory be dropped and to tighten in practice yet. And that went something like: ".... We know that you have to pay no child support But if we calculate the need of Hartzers, we expect you anyway with a He gets just less from the state you will him not to starve" Need community calls itself the construct of the Schröder government. And especially great: When maintenance of adult children there was always strict limits, not in the Hartz IV calculation. Here is credited until all are in need community on Hartz IV level.

No contact for Hartz IV

A blank check for the clans-poverty so. Thanks to the agenda Poverty is thus as contagious as a dangerous disease become - something like leprosy, which is after all transmitted by direct contact. And the successful protection against poverty is just like once in leprosy: Best depart from any contact with the afflicted. In the case at the father was only victim of his good nature and naivete. He was just stupid, his son to accommodate further. Had he put him on the air to give him a lot of trouble could have been spared.
(Google translate)

Read the full article here

German Minister of Labor Andrea Nahles, you silence a critical blogger by confiscation of all IT equipment.

Andrea Nahles - Critical blogger?
Confiscate his computer!

cc all Ministries

Minister Nahles,

On September 13, 2016 I contacted you (and other ministries) by email with regard to an online criminal complaint sent to the police in Munich in May 2015 by a person who signed the email with a false name! Based on this email all our IT equipment was confiscated! The second time in your Banana Republic, that has a hard time with free speech.

This person is with 99% certainty either from the Jobcenter, the German Labor Agency (BA), or a goon. IOW, you are indirectly involved. The German Labor Agency (BA) and the notorious Jobcenters are under legal supervision of your ministry (§ 393 SGB III).

The email was sent from the IP Address 217.253.91.237 on May 7, 2015.

We, that is me and my daughter, demand that you disclose the name and address of this person!

Companies under your legal supervision engage in

• Confiscation of computers and IT equipment including router in order to shut a critical blogger up.
• Infringement of free speech, guaranteed in the Basic Law.
• Blackmailing in order to suppress free speech.
• Racist and discriminating demands devoid of any legal basis.
• Confiscation of computers by a Bavarian court with the intent of getting access to my blog in order to delete it.
• Frivolous law suits that in a civilized country would have been thrown out of court.
• Ruining a blogger financially with the intent of getting him imprisoned.

Unfortunately, your country has no anti-SLAPP statute! Small wonder with a Minister of Justice who has never practiced law!

The first court trial in this case in Munich with the talented cunning judge Birkhofer-Hoffmann had all the hallmarks of a Kangaroo court. A court that I believe should rather be relocated to Robert Mugabe's Zimbabwe.

You will receive another email relating to the Mac Book Pro of my daughter which was returned damaged by the Munich court. We expect a full recompensation.

BTW Minister Nahles, could you confirm that people like Frank-Jürgen Weise, Heinrich Alt, Manfred Jäger et al. did not have to queue up in front of a brothel? This may sound strange, but this here is the kind of shit one gets when sending a complaint to the head office of the German Labor Agency. Your ministry certainly excels and "you give us a new kind of shudder", to quote Victor Hugo out of context.

Thanks,

Packs an, aber ein bischen weniger "douche". OK!

via Anarchy in your Head

German Minister of Labor Andrea Nahles, you are aiding and abetting criminal conduct.

Andrea Nahles, overweight
and undercommunicative.

cc all Ministries

Minister Nahles,

On September 10, 2016 I contacted you by email (1) and demanded that you assure the immediate release of the 19 pages of missing documents pertaining to the criminal complaint against me by the head of the Labor Agency in Ingolstadt, the bodyweight-challenged Manfred Jäger (2). As with prior emails to you, you refused to answer this one as well. The right to access to the files is covered by Article 6 of the Convention.

The German Labor Agency (BA) is under legal supervision of your ministry (§ 393 SGB III).

I expect the release of said documents until Friday, Sept. 30, 2016. In the negative event I will file a criminal complaint against you with the State Prosecutor in Berlin. The whole court case against me was rigged from the start; by the judges and by my crooked court-appointed "attorney" Aglaia Muth!

Companies under your legal supervision engage in

• Infringement of free speech, guaranteed in the Basic Law.
• Blackmailing in order to suppress free speech. (3)
• Racist and discriminating demands devoid of any legal basis.
• Are in cahoots with the Bavarian judiciary, a judiciary with Neonazi affinity.
• Frivolous law suits that in a civilized country would have been thrown out of court.

Unfortunately, your country has no anti-SLAPP statute like the USA! Go figure.

You will receive another email relating to the 3rd case filed against us in due course.

Latest by the second week of October I will send a concise complaint covering all three cases (4) against us, perpetrated by agencies under your legal supervision, to the ECHR in Strasbourg.

Thanks,

____________
(1) There were several emails to you which you all left unanswered!
(2) I am not quite sure, did the eminent Mr. Taleb include Manni Jäger when he penned his blog post "The Intellectual yet Idiot"? But then again, the subject was intellectuals.
(3) A threat of € 10,000 to delete a blog post sent to your Ministry in 2012.
(4) Case #2 has been submitted to the ECHR in July 2016.

Mercy, Mercy, Mercy

So the German government calls for an active approach against racism?

De Maizière calls active approach of Facebook Against Racism 

Culture Time News from Monday, 08/29/2016 

Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière (CDU) calls for more commitment against hate comments on the net from the social network Facebook. The company should take by itself and without complaints racist content from our Web sites, de Maiziere said on August 29, 2016, following talks in Berlin Facebook office. This also applied to calls for violence or overt support of terrorist acts.

That call comes from a strange source. Home Minister de Mazière is one of the chief hate mongers in the German government. Let's leave aside for a moment that he is actually not concerned about racism as such, but that it can get a forum on FB, Twitter and such. So his agenda is a little different. It is a red herring.

Let us rather listen to Adolph L. Reed:

Adolph L. Reed

Let me be blunter than I’ve ever been in print about what I am saying: As a political strategy, exposing racism is wrongheaded and at best an utter waste of time. It is the political equivalent of an appendix: a useless vestige of an earlier evolutionary moment that’s usually innocuous but can flare up and become harmful.

There are two reasons for this judgment.

One is that the language of race and racism is too imprecise to describe effectively even how patterns of injustice and inequality are racialized in a post-Jim Crow world. “Racism” can cover everything from individual prejudice and bigotry, unself-conscious perception of racial stereotypes, concerted group action to exclude or subordinate, or the results of ostensibly neutral market forces.

It can be a one-word description and explanation of patterns of unequal distribution of income and wealth, services and opportunities, police brutality, a stockbroker’s inability to get a cab, neighborhood dislocation and gentrification, poverty, unfair criticism of black or Latino athletes, or being denied admission to a boutique.

Because the category is so porous, it doesn’t really explain anything. Indeed, it is an alternative to explanation.
Exposing racism apparently makes those who do it feel good about themselves. Doing so is cathartic, though safely so, in the same way that proclaiming one’s patriotism is in other circles.

It is a summary, concluding judgment rather than a preliminary to a concrete argument. It doesn’t allow for politically significant distinctions; in fact, as a strategy, exposing racism requires subordinating the discrete features of a political situation to the overarching goal of asserting the persistence and power of racism as an abstraction.

This leads to the second reason for my harsh judgment. Many liberals gravitate to the language of racism not simply because it makes them feel righteous but also because it doesn’t carry any political warrant beyond exhorting people not to be racist. In fact, it often is exactly the opposite of a call to action. Such formulations as “racism is our national disease” or similar pieties imply that racism is a natural condition. Further, it implies that most whites inevitably and immutably oppose blacks and therefore can’t be expected to align with them around common political goals.

'The Intellectual Yet Idiot’ by Nassim Nicholas Taleb

There is hardly anybody who has not witnessed some such person, either in person, or has seen him/her on TV, or read something from such a person. Newspapers are a very good source. The one belonging to the "elite", to the circle where you can screw up, yet find yourself in a different position with even better perks.

Taleb explains the IYI, the intellctual yet idiot, or as the Germans say, the "Dampfplauderer".

. . . . . . . . 

The Intellectual Yet Idiot

What we have been seeing worldwide, from India to the UK to the US, is the rebellion against the inner circle of no-skin-in-the-game policymaking “clerks” and journalists-insiders, that class of paternalistic semi-intellectual experts with some Ivy league, Oxford-Cambridge, or similar label-driven education who are telling the rest of us 1) what to do, 2) what to eat, 3) how to speak, 4) how to think… and 5) who to vote for.

But the problem is the one-eyed following the blind: these self-described members of the “intelligenzia” can’t find a coconut in Coconut Island, meaning they aren’t intelligent enough to define intelligence hence fall into circularities — but their main skill is capacity to pass exams written by people like them. With psychology papers replicating less than 40%, dietary advice reversing after 30 years of fatphobia, macroeconomic analysis working worse than astrology, the appointment of Bernanke who was less than clueless of the risks, and pharmaceutical trials replicating at best only 1/3 of the time, people are perfectly entitled to rely on their own ancestral instinct and listen to their grandmothers (or Montaigne and such filtered classical knowledge) with a better track record than these policymaking goons.

Indeed one can see that these academico-bureaucrats who feel entitled to run our lives aren’t even rigorous, whether in medical statistics or policymaking. They cant tell science from scientism — in fact in their eyes scientism looks more scientific than real science. (For instance it is trivial to show the following: much of what the Cass-Sunstein-Richard Thaler types — those who want to “nudge” us into some behavior — much of what they would classify as “rational” or “irrational” (or some such categories indicating deviation from a desired or prescribed protocol) comes from their misunderstanding of probability theory and cosmetic use of first-order models.) They are also prone to mistake the ensemble for the linear aggregation of its components as we saw in the chapter extending the minority rule.

The Intellectual Yet Idiot is a production of modernity hence has been accelerating since the mid twentieth century, to reach its local supremum today, along with the broad category of people without skin-in-the-game who have been invading many walks of life. Why? Simply, in most countries, the government’s role is between five and ten times what it was a century ago (expressed in percentage of GDP). The IYI seems ubiquitous in our lives but is still a small minority and is rarely seen outside specialized outlets, think tanks, the media, and universities — most people have proper jobs and there are not many openings for the IYI.

Beware the semi-erudite who thinks he is an erudite. He fails to naturally detect sophistry.

The IYI pathologizes others for doing things he doesn’t understand without ever realizing it is his understanding that may be limited. He thinks people should act according to their best interests and he knows their interests, particularly if they are “red necks” or English non-crisp-vowel class who voted for Brexit. When plebeians do something that makes sense to them, but not to him, the IYI uses the term “uneducated”. What we generally call participation in the political process, he calls by two distinct designations: “democracy” when it fits the IYI, and “populism” when the plebeians dare voting in a way that contradicts his preferences. While rich people believe in one tax dollar one vote, more humanistic ones in one man one vote, Monsanto in one lobbyist one vote, the IYI believes in one Ivy League degree one-vote, with some equivalence for foreign elite schools and PhDs as these are needed in the club.

More socially, the IYI subscribes to The New Yorker. He never curses on twitter. He speaks of “equality of races” and “economic equality” but never went out drinking with a minority cab driver (again, no real skin in the game as the concept is foreign to the IYI). Those in the U.K. have been taken for a ride by Tony Blair. The modern IYI has attended more than one TEDx talks in person or watched more than two TED talks on Youtube. Not only will he vote for Hillary Monsanto-Malmaison because she seems electable and some such circular reasoning, but holds that anyone who doesn’t do so is mentally ill.

The IYI has a copy of the first hardback edition of The Black Swan on his shelves, but mistakes absence of evidence for evidence of absence. He believes that GMOs are “science”, that the “technology” is not different from conventional breeding as a result of his readiness to confuse science with scientism.

Typically, the IYI get the first order logic right, but not second-order (or higher) effects making him totally incompetent in complex domains. In the comfort of his suburban home with 2-car garage, he advocated the “removal” of Gadhafi because he was “a dictator”, not realizing that removals have consequences (recall that he has no skin in the game and doesn’t pay for results).

The IYI has been wrong, historically, on Stalinism, Maoism, GMOs, Iraq, Libya, Syria, lobotomies, urban planning, low carbohydrate diets, gym machines, behaviorism, transfats, freudianism, portfolio theory, linear regression, Gaussianism, Salafism, dynamic stochastic equilibrium modeling, housing projects, selfish gene, Bernie Madoff (pre-blowup) and p-values. But he is convinced that his current position is right.

The IYI is member of a club to get traveling privileges; if social scientist he uses statistics without knowing how they are derived (like Steven Pinker and psycholophasters in general); when in the UK, he goes to literary festivals; he drinks red wine with steak (never white); he used to believe that fat was harmful and has now completely reversed; he takes statins because his doctor told him to do so; he fails to understand ergodicity and when explained to him, he forgets about it soon later; he doesn’t use Yiddish words even when talking business; he studies grammar before speaking a language; he has a cousin who worked with someone who knows the Queen; he has never read Frederic Dard, Libanius Antiochus, Michael Oakeshot, John Gray, Amianus Marcellinus, Ibn Battuta, Saadiah Gaon, or Joseph De Maistre; he has never gotten drunk with Russians; he never drank to the point when one starts breaking glasses (or, preferably, chairs); he doesn’t know the difference between Hecate and Hecuba; he doesn’t know that there is no difference between “pseudointellectual” and “intellectual” in the absence of skin in the game; has mentioned quantum mechanics at least twice in the past five years in conversations that had nothing to do with physics.

He knows at any point in time what his words or actions are doing to his reputation.

But a much easier marker: he doesn’t deadlift.

Not a IYI

Postscript

From the reactions to this piece, I discovered that the IYI has difficulty, when reading, in differentiating between the satirical and the literal.

PostPostcript

The IYI thinks this criticism of IYIs means “everybody is an idiot”, not realizing that their group represents, as we said, a tiny minority — but they don’t like their sense of entitlement to be challenged and although they treat the rest of humans as inferiors, they don’t like it when the waterhose is turned to the opposite direction (what the French call arroseur arrosé). (For instance, Richard Thaler, partner of the dangerous GMO advocate Übernudger Cass Sunstein, interpreted this piece as saying that “there are not many non-idiots not called Taleb”, not realizing that people like him are < 1% or even .1% of the population.)

Note: this piece can be reproduced, translated, and published by anyone under the condition that it is in its entirety and mentions that it is extracted from Skin in the Game.

Whole lotta love

Page used a Sonic Wave Theremin in his Zeppelin days in a very guitar-like way—running it through a Maestro Echoplex and Orange amps and cabinets. .. For several months in 1971, writes fansite Achilles Last Stand, Page “used a double-stacked Theremin” for twice the sonic assault.
...
Those in the know will know that Page put the theremin to use on one of the band’s most technically experimental recordings (though it also happens to be an appropriated blues stomper), “Whole Lotta Love” from 1969’s Led Zeppelin II. “I always envisioned the middle to be quite avant-garde,” Page recently told Guitar World, “The Theremin generates most of the higher pitches and my Les Paul makes the lower sounds.” Watch him rip out a theremin-and-guitar solo above in the live performance above from 1973, beginning at 1:45. Taken with the psychedelic video effects, the performance reaches mystical planes of rhythmic abstraction. 

Those in the know will know that Page put the theremin to use on one of the band’s most technically experimental recordings (though it also happens to be an appropriated blues stomper), “Whole Lotta Love” from 1969’s Led Zeppelin II. “I always envisioned the middle to be quite avant-garde,” Page recently told Guitar World, “The Theremin generates most of the higher pitches and my Les Paul makes the lower sounds.” Watch him rip out a theremin-and-guitar solo above in the live performance above from 1973, beginning at 1:45. Taken with the psychedelic video effects, the performance reaches mystical planes of rhythmic abstraction. 

via Open Culture

And now some art

Had never heard of José García Y Más before, so big H/T to Acting Man, one of the finest financial blogs you can get. Why not add some refinement to this eclectic blog and show some of his aquarells.

The Failed Artist

Der Rettende Engel

US Army Spokeswoman

Es Lebe Der Krieg

Good Bye

Bundesadler

Ach und dann war da noch das Bayerische Staatsministerium der Justiz und das Verbot, Geschichtsfälschungen in Nazi Dokumentarfilmen zu kritisieren.

Adorno

Bayerisches Staatsministerium der Justiz
80097 München

Ihr Zeichen: E7 - 1402 E - II - 3006/2016

München, 19. Sept. 2016

Guten Tag Herr Oberstaatsanwalt Hauck,

Am 08.März 2016 sendeten meine Tochter und ich eine Beschwerde über Oberstaatsanwalt Hummer an das Bayerische Staatsministerium der Justiz.

Der Anlass war sein krudes Verbot, geschichtsverfälschende Szenen z. B. in dem Film "Aufstieg des Bösen", der Anfang April 2015 auf dem TV Sender RTL zur besten Sendezeit lief, als auch die latente Glorifizierung der NS Zeit in mehreren deutschen TV Sendern an mehreren Tagen pro Woche und dies seit Jahren überhaupt mit einer Kritik zu begegnen.

Ich bin als Hartz 4ler sprachlich nicht so versiert, dem Sujet das ihm gebührende Timbre zu vermitteln und überlasse daher Herrn Oberstaatsanwalt Hummer dies in seinen ureigenen Worten zu vermitteln.

"Im Übrigen verbieten sich Vergleiche zwischen der Tat des Angeklagten einerseits und Presse-bzw. Fernsehinhalten andererseits, da letztere regelmässig der staats- bürgerlichen Aufklärung, der Berichterstattung über Vorgänge des Zeitgeschehens oder der Geschichte dienen und daher gem. § 86 Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 86 a Abs. 3 STGB vom Straftatbestand ausgenommen sind. Dass das Handeln des Angeklagten hingegen nicht unter diese Ausnahmebestimmung fällt, hat das Berufungsgericht ausführlich und ohne Rechtsfehler dargelegt (UA S. 7)."

Mit Schreiben vom 14. März 2016 teilten Sie uns freundlicherweise zu unserem Entzücken mit, unser Obliegen an den "Herrn Generalstaatsanwalt in München weitergeleitet" zu haben, "da er die Dienstaufsicht über die Angehörigen seiner Behörde führt" und "von dort (würden wir) weitere Nachricht erhalten".

Wohl wissend ob der Schrullen von Angehörigen, vulgo auch oftmals im Volksmunde die buckelige Verwandschaft genannt, hat der Herr Generalstaatsanwalt mein volles und üppiges Verständnis für gelegentlich nicht optimale Kommunikationsströme in Behörden. Dies liess vermutlich eine Antwort ausbleiben.

Ich erlaube mir daher gütigst, um die Zuwendung unseres ursprünglichen Anliegens zu ersuchen. Es gebricht mir das Herz, Ihre werte Aufmerksamkeit über Gebühr beansprucht zu haben und verbleibe staatsbürgerlich

 mit vorzüglichen Grüssen

. . . . . . . . . . .

English  version  (for chronological  documentation  and  presentation at  the  USCIS.gov and ECHR in Strasbourg)


Bayerisches Staatsministerium der Justiz
80097 München

File #:: E7 - 1402 E - II - 3006/2016

Munich, Sept. 19, 2016

Dear Prosecutor Hauck,

On March 8, 2016 my daughter and I had sent a complaint about Attorney Hummer to the Bavarian State Ministry of Justice.

The reason for our complaint was prosecutor Hummer's rather bizarre imposition on me to refrain from criticizing historical falsifications in a movie about Hitler, aired on TV prime time. In the same context I had as well lamented the latent glorification of the Nazi time on several German TV channels, aired several days a week for years.

As a Hartz 4 recipient I lack the linguistic refinement to give the subject its proper timbre and therefore leave it to Chief Prosecutor Hummer to convey this in his very own words:

"Furthermore, comparisons between the act of the accused on the one hand and press or television content on the other hand is prohibited, because the latter regularly serve as civic and political education, reporting on events of current affairs or history and are therefore excluded from the offense according to § 86 Abs. 3 i.V.m. § 86 a Abs. 3 STGB. The actions of the accused do not fall under this exception, however, as the court of appeal has set out in detail and without any error of law (Decision p 7)."

In your letter of March 14, 2016 you kindly informed us to our delight that you had "forwarded (our request) to the Attorney General in Munich ... as he performs the administrative supervision of the members of his department" and we would receive a reply from there.

Knowing fully well the quirks of departments, the Attorney General has my complete understanding of sometimes not optimal communication flows in authorities or offices. This then probably is the reason for the communication void.

I would appreciate if you could kindly remind the Attorney General. Allow me to apologize profusely for having taken your precious time in this rather mundane matter.

 Sincerely,

The German liberal elite ambling in their walled garden of free speech

Soren Kierkegaard

Once you label me you negate me.

Soren Kierkegaard

"Facebook needs to do more than before, so that its platform is not a playground for right-wing extremists", German Minister of Justice Heiko Maas said to the Bild newspaper.

Freedom of expression is a "valuable asset", the Minister said. He added: "However, the Internet is not a lawless area where racist agitation and criminal utterances may be spread uncontrolled."

Interesting how the able minister, who has not spent a single day in his life as a lawyer, equates right-wingers and people with other opinions with extremists, racist agitation and criminal utterances. As if his own coalition party and ordinary bourgeois people would not hold and publicly express such views. Why else are the comments functions disabled on websites of German news websites?

Here is the Minister for Family Affairs, blonde Manuela Schwesig, aka 'Küsten-

Heiko & Manuela, ready to pounce on free hate speech

Barbie':

"Hatred is not an opinion. Neither on the Internet. With the 'No hate speech' campaign we in Germany want to set another example against hatred and violence. We want to support the people to engage themselves for democracy and to fight against hatred and discrimination - online and offline," said Manuela Schwesig.

If hatred is not an opinion, why bother? Of course, the sentence is plain nonsense. When somebody is called an asshole, that is without doubt an opinion. Whether it is true or false, is a different matter.

Let's listen in to an interview between Yasmin Nair and Walter Benn Michaels:

YN: Hate crimes...

WBM: Complete  bullshit.

Both ministers are united in one desire, to have such opinions deleted from Twitter and Facebook in order to create a clean environment. An environment with attuned people that "engage ... for democracy and to fight against hatred and discrimination". An environment in which the IDENTITY of a refugee is created, attended to and celebrated. Untainted, pristine and resting in itself. This self is the self of inequality and nobody is nor wants to be bothered by this. The proponents of free speech are indifferent to it. They strive for an antiseptic communication.

While they correctly see the impetus of the German government's 'No hate speech' campaign as an assault on free speech and celebrate their intellectual prowess as proof of their noble intentions, they are nonchalant about the plight of the refugees. It is free speech they pay obeisance to. This is their holy right, their altar, while at the same time humanitarian thoughts and compassion fall by the wayside. The neoliberalism of the ego.

Here again Walter Benn Michaels.

YN: You  write  in  your  book,  “The  preferred  crimes  of  neoliberalism are  always  hate  crimes;  when  our  favorite  victims  are  the  victims  of prejudice,  we  are  all  neoliberals.”  What  do  you  mean?

WBM: You  and  others  have  analyzed  the  various  practical  ways  in which   hate   crimes   laws  perpetrate   or  extend   inequalities   that already  exist.  I  think  that  analysis  is  totally  convincing.  But  my  own opposition   is   somewhat   more   primitive:   that   hate   crimes   are precisely  defined  as  crimes  of  identity. The  biggest  of  all  hate  crimes  in  our  culture  is  the  Holocaust.  The point  of  course  is  not  to  defend  the  Holocaust  but  to  suggest  that the  murder  of  six  million  people  is  sufficient  unto  itself  as  a  crime. The first point is that it’s not as if we want to legitimate these crimes. 

The second point is that insofar as we make hate crimes foundational for us, we end up imagining the just society as a society without hatred, without prejudice. My argument is not for prejudice; only that the elimination of prejudice has nothing to do with the elimination of exploitation. And that insofar as we focus on the idea of social justice as the elimination of prejudice, with hate crimes being a kind of ne plus ultra of that form, what we are doing is focusing on something which, even if we should succeed, would make no difference whatsoever in the principal inequalities that currently confront us.

That should give the nobly-intentioned liberals enough food for thought. Fighting the ban of hate speech is all about having a good conscience while disregarding inequalities in society. Guaranteeing those disadvantaged their identity means safeguarding them from so-called ill speech/hate speech and keeping them on their predetermined rung on the ladder of society and the economy. A cynical indifference in a walled garden of good conduct.

What both ministers unite is their complete disregard of the inequality of these people the hatred is directed at, while being naive about the origin of the perpetrators of hate crimes.

YN: It’s  also  true  that  poor  white  people  are  often  held  as  the  most phobic  and  hate-prone.

WBM: Let’s  say  for  the  sake  of  argument  that  poor  white  people  are more  characteristically  racist  and  homophobic  than  middle-class white  people.  Let’s  say  for  the  sake  of  argument  it’s  true.  The argument  here  is  not  to  defend  their  homophobia,  or  their  racism; it’s  not  defensible.  But  my  deeper  argument  is  that  they  are  not  the enemy.  That  is  to  say,  if  you  turned  the  world  into  a  world  where  the elimination  of  prejudice  is  the  sole  desideratum  then  you’ve  got  a face-off.  Between  the  upper-middle  class,  committed  to  its  own sense  of  virtue,  which  is  completely  tolerant  of  the  inequalities  which make  poor  white  people  poor  and  completely  intolerant  of  the racism  and  sexism  that  poor  whites  exemplify. 

Denouncing and banning free speech, err, hate speech to bask in a virtuous circle of life, while shoving the fact of inequality under the carpet. Indifference to economic inequality and to guarantee the disadvantaged their identity lays the groundwork for their future status in society as a dependable and frugal source of cheap labor, with state-guaranteed dignity. Unless they get deported.

The  liberal  elite  that conservatives  criticize  really  does  exist.  It’s  an  elite  whose  liberalism consists   in  its  opposition  to  discrimination,  in  its  cultivation  of identity,  and  in  complete  indifference  to  economic  inequality.  So,  for the   liberal   elites,   the   poor  whites  are  the  people  they  love  to hate.  And  the  liberal  elites  are  the  people  the  poor  whites  love  to hate.  If  the  liberal  elite  began  to  think  of  its  liberalism  as  a  challenge to  its  elitism,  we  would  have  a  different  world.  A  world  where  the goal  was  not  to  diversify  the  elite  but  to  eliminate  elites.  Whereas now  we’re  just  diversifying  the  elite. 

It is exactly for this purpose that the German government has turned to the Bertelsmann company Arvato and the notorious Amadeu Antonio Foundation, whose chairwomen is an ex Stasi member like her late father, to go against, what they consider to be, hate speech.

How identity is celebrated and cynically utilized and conveniently discarded is shown by the Amadeu Antonio Foundation, which seems to be a financially pretty successful investment fund. Here is an excerpt from the German Wikipedia page (there is no English version!). Please note that his last name is Kiowa. That probably had too much of an African ring to qualify for inclusion in the name of the foundation.

Kiowa left behind his pregnant girlfriend Gabriele Schimanski. Their son was born on January 9, 1991, the same day, Kiowa's corpse was transferred to Angola. There Antonio was buried in the cemetery of Sant'Ana in Luanda. Since September 3, 2011 decorated with a wooden cross be previously covered only by earth grave. Antonios wife and son hostilities were suspended in Eberswalde other, so among other things, the pram was daubed with swastikas and later destroyed. Gabriele Schimanski died in 2015. The cause of death is unclear.

The mother of Kiowa, who belongs to the people of the Bakongo, lives with her family in the slums Rocha Pinto in the Angolan capital Luanda. For the funeral, and repair of the tomb of her son there was in 2011 an appeal, in which the mother could be handed over 1,500 euros. Whether a promised financial support for the family that had decided in 1990 the Eberswalde council, has been received by the members, is currently being investigated. To demonstrate the relationship between Antonio and his family undoubtedly, his mother was a hair sample for genetic matching from. In addition, the Eberswalde council decided on 30 September 2011, the Antonios family occasion of the 20th anniversary of the death to send 5,000 euros support performance.

(Google translate)

Read also: Adolph Reed: Identity Politics Is Neoliberalism

Baila Morena

Strafanzeige wg. Betrugs gegen Jobcenter München Mitarbeiter

Jobcenter MA beim jährlichen
Senso-motorik Test

Staatsanwaltschaft München I
Linprunstraße 25
80097 München

17. September 2016

Hiermit  erstatte  ich  Strafanzeige  gegen

Anette Farrenkopf (Geschäftsführerin) - Jobcenter München, Orleansplatz 11, 81667 München
Frau/Herr Preukschat - Jobcenter München, Orleansplatz 11, 81667 München
Frau Erhardt - Jobcenter München Pasing, Landsberger Str. 486, 81241 München
Frau Strama - Jobcenter München Pasing, Landsberger Str. 486, 81241 München

wegen Verstoss gegen § 263 STGB Abs. 1, 2, 3 1., 3 3., 3 4.

Meine Tochter besuchte eine Fachoberschule in München. Ein Schuljahr umfasst nach allgemein geteilten und auch empirisch belegten Einschätzungen sowohl gewisse Lehrzeiten (als auch Leerzeiten aufgrund der für ein Billiglohn-Land als auch exportabhängigen Wirtschaft logischen Investitionsallokationen im Ausland resultierend u.a. in Lehrereinsparungen) und intermittierend Ferien.

Im Dezember 2015 (Anlage 1) erhielten meine Tochter und ich ein Schreiben wegen angeblicher Überzahlung. Nachfolgend drangsalierte uns o.g. Personal der Billiglohn-Kaschemme, offiziell firmierend unter dem evokativen Pseudonym 'Jobcenter', mit Nachforderungen von insgesamt € 439,39.

Als Beleg angeführt wurde der Nebenjob-Verdienst meiner Tochter im Monat August 2015 (€ 766,-) und juristisch, ja wie soll ich dies nun anders ausdrücken als gekonnt unterspült, durch Bezug auf die §§ 9 und 11 SGB II. Nun gilt gemeinhin der Monat August als ein Monat, in den die Sommerferien fallen. Ein Job in dieses Zeitfenster fallend, könnte ohne erstaunte Blicke zu riskieren, als ein Ferienjob interpretiert werden. Natürlich sind dies alles nette und ansehnliche Paragraphen, die eine Iris entzücken können, doch denke ich, der adäquaten Bildgestaltung förderlicher sei doch eher geeignet der

§ 1 ALG II-V

(4) Nicht als Einkommen zu berücksichtigen sind Einnahmen von Schülerinnen und Schülern allgemein- oder berufsbildender Schulen, die das 25. Lebensjahr noch nicht vollendet haben, aus Erwerbstätigkeiten, die in den Schulferien für höchstens vier Wochen je Kalenderjahr ausgeübt werden, soweit diese einen Betrag in Höhe von 1.200 Euro kalenderjährlich nicht überschreiten. Für die Bemessung des Zeitraums nach Satz 1 bleiben in den Schulferien ausgeübte Erwerbstätigkeiten mit einem Einkommen, das monatlich den in § 11 Absatz 2 Satz 2 des Zweiten Buches Sozialgesetzbuch oder in Absatz 1 Nummer 9 genannten monatlichen Betrag nicht übersteigt, außer Betracht. Satz 1 gilt nicht für Schülerinnen und Schüler, die einen Anspruch auf Ausbildungsvergütung haben. Die Bestimmungen des Jugendarbeitsschutzgesetzes bleiben unberührt.

Meiner Recherche zufolge liegt der Betrag von € 766,- deutlich im Rahmen. Nach freundlicher Überlassung eines Cray XK7 Titan Supercomputers konnte ich Gewissheit erlangen, dass der Betrag von € 766,- marginal aber doch dezidiert unter dem Betrag von € 1.200,- liegt, wie er in § 1 ALG II-V Abs. 4 angegeben ist. Gewissenhaft wie ich bin, bemühte ich auch IBM Watson und fand wiederum Bestätigung. Ich versuche immer konsequent Poppers empirisches Falzifikationsprinzip anzuwenden, penibler Primel der ich bin.

Es kann kein Zweifel an der Kenntnis dieses Paragraphen bei den o.g. Personen bestehen. Vielmehr baute das perfide Gelüst nach Betrug zum eigenen Nutzen (siehe u.a. Der Spiegel Artikel 'Mit allen Mitteln') auf die unterstellte Unkenntnis der Angeschriebenen und unterstreicht einmal mehr die niederen Beweggründe, die Geschäftsgrundlage dieser reichsweit operierenden Firma ist.

In Parenthese sei bemerkt, wie interessant es wäre in diesen und ähnlichen Fällen zu wissen, wie viele Hartz 4 Rezipienten mit unzureichenden Sprachkenntnissen und/oder juristischen Kenntnissen (hier insbesondere Ausländer) mittels solch kruder Methoden betrogen werden.

Ich bin schon jetzt gespannt zu lesen, wie auch diese Strafanzeige von der Münchner Justiz abgebügelt wird.

Telekom, wer steckt bitte hinter der IP Adresse 217.253.91.237?

Guten Tag bei der Telekom,

Ich wende mich heute mit einer Bitte an sie.

Am 7. Mai 2015 hat jemand eine Online Strafanzeige gegen mich an die bayerische Polizei in München gesandt, die so aussah und mit nahezu absoluter Sicherheit von einem Crack Head vom Jobcenter, der Bundesagentur für Arbeit oder einem gedungenen Strohmann stammt.

Anzeige unter falschem Namen

Ist der Bengel doch beim Texten ein bischen ins Schleudern geraten und hat glatt einen Namen angegeben, der nicht sein eigener ist. Das ist okidoki, wir sind hier in der Bauerntrampel-Provinz (1), aber die Übermittlung der IP Adresse hatte er ausser Acht gelassen. Oder besser, er war sich sicher, die heruntergekommene Münchner Justiz würde wie schon zuvor die Akteneinsicht verweigern. Schliesslich muss doch ein Blogger kalt gestellt werden. Dabei übersah der Dickhead die Hudoc Datei mit einigen Entscheidungen, dümmlicher Schelm der er ist. Sowas wie Rachdad versus France.

Die IP Adresse sieht näher betrachtet so aus:

Name der Person mit IP Adresse 217.253.91.237 gesucht.

Da der Inhalt der Anzeige einiges her gibt - siehe hier -, datums- und tenormässig etc., dachte ich mir, es wäre doch ne tolle Sache, wenn jemand von Ihnen mal so ganz en passant in die Logs sieht, wer das wohl sein könnte.

Wie gesagt, 7. Mai 2015 und IP Adresse 217.253.91.237.

Ich will auch nicht mit ner Schäuble Schwarzen Null hier langweilen oder zu der Pissbrühe vom Oktoberfest laden, sondern pekuniär voll in die Sharing Economy reintreten, wie sich das gehört. Privates QE, Helicopter money oder lapidar gesagt, für den Service bin ich bereit, tief in meinen Doppelripp Schlüpfer Modell 'Let him Swing' zu greifen:

€ 500,- (in Worten fünf hundert) EZB Draghi Sesterzen, Pimp Juice, ass-dough, bugsy, Schienen!

Ist dies ein Witz? Absolut nein, denn u.a. ist durch die verrottete bayerische Justiz das Mac Book Pro meiner Tochter so beschädigt worden, dass es unverkäuflich ist. Unsere Wohnung ist fotografiert worden und meine Tochter sollte durchsucht werden. Dies war die zweite Computerbeschlagnahme durch die bayerische Justiz.


Beste Grüsse in Pink
_______
(1) mein Neologismus für Bayern. Copyright geschützt.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe

Democracy has nothing to do with freedom. Democracy is a soft variant of communism, and rarely in the history of ideas has it been taken for anything else.

. . . . . .

What is true, just, and beautiful is not determined by popular vote. The masses everywhere are ignorant, short-sighted, motivated by envy, and easy to fool. Democratic politicians must appeal to these masses in order to be elected. Whoever is the best demagogue will win. Almost by necessity, then, democracy will lead to the perversion of truth, justice and beauty.

. . . . . .

No, the state is anything but the result of a contract! No one with even just an ounce of common sense would agree to such a contract. I have a lot of contracts in my files, but nowhere is there one like this. The state is the result of aggressive force and subjugation. It has evolved without contractual foundation, just like a gang of protection racketeers. And concerning the struggle of all against all: that is a myth.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe

Frumpy

Them good old days.

Das Jobcenter München und der Schüler Ferienverdienst

Frage an Jobcenter Mitarbeiter

Sozialgericht München
Richelstr. 11
80634 München

15.09.2016

Geschäftszeichen: JC SGG - ...

Sehr geehrtes Gericht,

Frau/Herr Preukschat führt in ihrem/seinem Brief vom 01. Sept. 2016 ein Urteil des LSG Hessen an, nach dem die Schriftform Unterschriftsform zu haben hat und damit mein Widerspruch "bereits unzulässig" ist. Das nimmt sich seltsam aus, endet doch selbiges Schreiben wie folgt:

"Dieses Schreiben ist maschinell erstellt und ohne Unterschrift gültig."

Wollen geschätzter Herr/will geschätzte Frau Preukschat dem Doppelstandard das Wort reden???

Bedauerlicherweise scheint Herr/Frau Preukschat eine Jobcenter-typische interessierte (Aus)Lesepräferenz zu haben. Dies spornt mich an, ihn/sie auf ein Urteil aus Trier hinzuweisen:

VG Trier vom 22.09.2009, Az 1 K 365/09.TR

Dort heisst es u.a.:

 1. Auch eine nicht mit einer vollständigen Unterschrift unterzeichnete Klageschrift kann dem Schriftformerfordernis des § 81 Abs. 1 VwGO genügen, wenn aufgrund anderer Anhaltspunkte die Urheberschaft und der Rechtsverkehrswille des Verfassers hinreichend sicher feststehen.

Die "Urheberschaft und der Rechtsverkehrswille des Verfassers" dürfte "hinreichend sicher feststehen", da Frau/Herr Preukschat vom JC München mich UND meine Tochter in dieser Sache am 01.September 2016 anschrieb. Allein die Logik gebietet schon diese Annahme, aber ich gestatte mir hier noch weitere Vorschläge zur genüsslichen Lektüre Herrn/Frau Preukschat zu empfehlen.

Da böte sich das Oberlandesgericht Celle, Az.: 14 U 94/06, Urteil vom 18. Juli 2006 an.

Wärmstens nahelegen kann ich Frau/Herrn Preukschat auch die Entscheidung des Bundesverfassungsgericht NJW 2002, 3534 und nicht zuletzt sei ein Hinweis auf den EGMR (Europ. Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte) gestattet, wonach übertriebener Formalismus zu vermeiden sei.

Bewusstseinserweiternd für Frau/Herr Preukschat von der Bundesbehörde zur Vermittlung wohlfeiler Arbeitskörper könnte auch der Umstand sein, dass der § 92 SGG eine Unterschrift für die Klageschrift nicht zwingend vorsieht und an den Widerspruch keine höheren Anforderungen zu stellen sind (Meyer-Ladewig/Keller/Leitherer, § 84 Rn. 3; Zeihe, § 84 Rn. 4a).

Nebenbei bemerkt, ein Blick auf die Unterschrift von Frau/Herr Preukschat auf besagtem Schreiben vom 01. Sept. 2016 würde in der Notaufnahme eines Krankenhauses Alarmstimmung aufkommen lassen.

Es werden von mir grundsätzlich keine Briefe auf postalischem Weg an das Jobcenter gesandt, da es sich um eine verlogene und kriminelle Firma handelt. So behauptete das JC München vor ein paar Jahren, ich hätte keinen Businessplan eingereicht und wäre nicht bei einer Veranstaltung der dubiosen Fa. KIZ Prowina (eine Fa. die es ermöglicht, unter Abgreifen von Steuerfördergeldern Hartz 4 Empfängern das Karriereziel finanzielle Verschuldung mit potenziellem Ruin zu erlangen) gewesen. Gott seis gepfiffen, konnte ich dies mittels der gespeicherten Emails belegen.

Meine Tochter jobte neben der Schule an zwei Tagen in der Woche für insgesamt 6 Stunden.

Allein die Konstellation des Schulbesuchs meiner Tochter liesse für halbwegs wache Zeitgenossen des Billiglohnlandes Deutschland die Vermutung aufkommen, es könnte sich beim Monat August um einen Ferienmonat handeln. Sodann den Fakt einer Arbeitstätigkeit in justament diesen Zeitraum fallend, könnte einigermassen sprachlich begabte Menschen zu dem kühnen Wort 'Ferienjob' steuern.

Der durchschnittliche Verdienst pro Monat betrug ca. € 215,- und der Sommerferienverdienst betrug € 766,-. Um diesen Betrag geht es bei der Nachforderung dem Betrug (§ 263 STGB, Abs. 1, 2, 3 1., 3 3., 3 4., sowie Abs. 7) des JC München.

Meiner Recherche zufolge liegt das deutlich im Rahmen. Nach freundlicher Überlassung eines Cray XK7 Titan Supercomputers konnte ich Gewissheit erlangen, dass der Betrag von € 766,- marginal aber doch dezidiert unter dem Betrag von € 1.200,- liegt, wie er in § 1 ALG II-V Abs. 4 angegeben ist (siehe unten). Gewissenhaft wie ich bin, bemühte ich auch IBM Watson und fand wiederum Bestätigung. Ich versuche immer konsequent Poppers empirisches Falzifikationsprinzip anzuwenden.

Siehe:
https://www.ihre-vorsorge.de/magazin/aktuell-beleuchtet/hartz-iv-und-ferienjobs

Generell gilt für alle ALG-II-Bezieher, also auch für Schüler: Einkünfte in Höhe von 100 Euro pro Monat sind - ganz unabhängig von der Ferien-Regelung - anrechnungsfrei. Schüler, die beispielsweise monatlich 100 Euro durch das Verteilen von Prospekten verdienen, dürfen diesen Betrag behalten - soweit sie keine weiteren Einkünfte aus Erwerbstätigkeit haben. 100 Euro pro Monat dürfen sie auch (weiterhin) während der Schulferien verdienen, ohne dass der Job damit gleich als Ferienjob gilt und damit den 1.200-Euro-Freibetrag verbraucht.

Praktisch bedeutet das: Ein Schüler aus einer Hartz-IV-Familie darf elf Monate lang je 100 Euro anrechnungsfrei hinzuverdienen und zusätzlich noch einmal 1.200 Euro in einem vierwöchigen Job in den Sommerferien. Geregelt ist dies in Paragraf 1 Absatz 4 der ALG-II-Verordnung. Schüler, die ihre Neben- und Ferienjobs so organisieren, dürfen also insgesamt 2.300 Euro behalten.

und

http://www.sozialleistungen.info/news/15.05.2010-ferienjob-einkommen-ab-juni-1-200-euro-pro-jahr-anrechnungsfrei/

§ 1 ALG II-V
(4) Nicht als Einkommen zu berücksichtigen sind Einnahmen von Schülerinnen und Schülern allgemein- oder berufsbildender Schulen, die das 25. Lebensjahr noch nicht vollendet haben, aus Erwerbstätigkeiten, die in den Schulferien für höchstens vier Wochen je Kalenderjahr ausgeübt werden, soweit diese einen Betrag in Höhe von 1.200 Euro kalenderjährlich nicht überschreiten. Für die Bemessung des Zeitraums nach Satz 1 bleiben in den Schulferien ausgeübte Erwerbstätigkeiten mit einem Einkommen, das monatlich den in § 11 Absatz 2 Satz 2 des Zweiten Buches Sozialgesetzbuch oder in Absatz 1 Nummer 9 genannten monatlichen Betrag nicht übersteigt, außer Betracht. Satz 1 gilt nicht für Schülerinnen und Schüler, die einen Anspruch auf Ausbildungsvergütung haben. Die Bestimmungen des Jugendarbeitsschutzgesetzes bleiben unberührt.

Retrospektiv meine didaktisch als auch methodologisch elegant und argumentativ überzeugend dargebrachte Argumentationskette betrachtet, handelt es sich hier um einen schlecht kaschierten Versuch der Jobcenter, durch das BMAS mit der Ministerin Nahles - Literatin manqué als auch ihre Orientierungslosigkeit dokumentierend durch den süffisant ambivalenten Berufswunsch entweder „Hausfrau oder Bundeskanzlerin“ - dekretierte Produktionszahlen (vulgo Ersparnisse) zu erreichen mit dem Zweck der eigenen Vorteilnahme mittels des bekannten Punktesystems (siehe u.a. Der Spiegel Artikel 'Mit allen Mitteln').

In Parenthese sei bemerkt, wie interessant es wäre in diesen und ähnlichen Fällen zu wissen, wie viele Hartz 4 Rezipienten mit unzureichenden Sprachkenntnissen und/oder juristischen Kenntnissen (hier insbesondere Ausländer) mittels solch kruder Methoden betrogen werden.

München, 15. Sept. 2016

Rabble-rousing against Erdogan in German schools

From the department 'Integration in Germany'. That has to be a sick joke.

Excerpt from a Migazin article

In worksheets for classrooms Turkish President Erdoğan is presented to the pupils as a budding dictator, compared his policies with Germany in 1933. Turkish parents associations, students and politicians criticize, the Ministry of Education is disinterested.

Westermann publishing company

Cartoon

"Erdoğan towards autocracy?" This question is highly controversial in Germany since the attempted coup in Turkey. In German classrooms, the answer is given. On worksheets of educational publisher "Westermann" for the policy lessons from grades 9 to 13 Erdoğan will be presented to students as a despot and dictator.

Elsewhere it is said with regard to the coup attempt: "What Erdoğan could previously not achieve through legal channels, the concentration of power in his person should be brought to the next level by means of comprehensive repression against journalists, opposition lawmakers and protesters citizens on the way" , Even before the military coup there had been "arbitrary arrests". With the failed military coup Erdoğan seems now "to have gained permission to settle permanently with his opponents".

Several critical excerpts from books, newspapers, magazines and an excerpts from the Nazi "Decree to protect the people and the state" from 1933 round off the Erdoğan-image. In two double lessons, students should link the predetermined content, analyze and develop "policy options Erdoğan".

The German Education Ministry does not comment

Whether the teaching materials for Erdoğan's policy adhere with those principles, the North Rhine-Westphalian Ministry of Education would not comment on. On request MiGAZIN was informed that the teacher see to it "that the political situation in Turkey and the assessment is viewed from different perspectives." Lose worksheets would "not be tested by the Ministry with regard to their curriculum conformity, nor in terms of their political thrust." This is exclusively the responsibility of the publishing company.

Uncommented is also the question of whether the comparison of Erdoğan's policies with the Nazi regime could have a relativistic or trivializing effect with regard to the German history with students.

The Ministry of Education does not give a shit,

as it "is not responsible for the content of such a review of teaching materials," said a spokeswoman to MiGAZIN.

Yeneroğlu: In unscrupulousness hard to beat

For the chairman of the Human Rights Committee of the Turkish Parliament, Mustafa Yeneroğlu (ACP), this explanation is unacceptable. The Turkish MP, who grew up in Germany and went to school, called on the Ministry of Education to fulfill its mission that "such propaganda materials not go unchecked for schools". A clarification from the publishing company is required. The Turkish President will "demonized and students indoctrinated" with the worksheets, so Yeneroğlu. The text is "swarming with untrue factual allegations and defamatory".

Yeneroğlu is particularly surprised about the comparisons with the Nazi regime. "In my school days that would have been unthinkable." These teaching materials "play Hitler and the Nazi regime down, puts the murder of six million Jews, the uniqueness of the Holocaust into question". The comparison of the suppression of the coup attempt in Turkey with the situation after the Reichstag fire can "hardly be topped in its ruthlessness."

What happens if a student does not agree with the German line?

"Small Erdoğan" - students teased

Recep Demir, student at a Cologne Gymnasium has experienced the worksheets in the policy lessons of class 9 himself. Already after the second question he refused to cooperate. "In this text we had to come to a definite conclusion, namely that Erdoğan is bad. I do not go along with that,"said the 15-year-old. The teacher did not show any interest in his arguments. Result: "I got a negative entry in the class book and some classmates teased me then, Small Erdoğan'".

Receps father "can not understand how such agitating papers can be presented to students". He will question the school principal and the teacher, he announced to MiGAZIN. The statement of the Ministry of Education is inexplicable to the father of two. "I can not imagine that the Ministry of Education has no influence on the teaching materials. They would intervene immediately if it were not for Erdoğan."

This translate is not particularly good, but you can catch the drift.

Migazin article in German.

. . . . . . .

The Westermann publishing company did not have one of its brightest days when it concocted these worksheets. If Erdogan is a Nazi, then that would imply that 

a) Germany has made a refugees deal with a Nazi.

b) reneged on the Armenia resolution after threats from  a Nazi.

c) is in negotiations for an EU visa deal with a Nazi.

d) invests 58 million Euro in a military base on the terrain of a Nazi.

Furthermore, it proves that German school teachers are idiots for missing these logical conclusions.