C R I M I N A L C O M P L A I N T against Martina Musati, Regionaldirektion Baden- Württemberg

English  version  (for chronological  documentation  and  presentation at  the  USCIS.gov)

State Prosecutor Stuttgart
Neckarstraße 145
70190 Stuttgart

Feb. 10, 2016

C R I M I N A L   C O M P L A I N T

Accused:  Mrs Martina Musati, Regionaldirektion  Baden Württemberg  der  Bundesagentur  für  Arbeit, Hölderlinstr. 36, 70025 Stuttgart

Offense:  

• Infringement of Art. 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
• Infringement of Article 5 of the Basic Law of Germany
• § 226 BGB (chicanery)

When and where: May 15, 2014 in Munich

The undersigned is informed and believes that

Count 1

Mrs Musati was Managing Director of the Jobcenter Munich from 2011 to mid 2015.

On May 15, 2014 Jürgen Sonneck, second in charge of the Jobcenter Munich, submitted a criminal complaint at the Munich police against my father because he had published and commented on statements against my person made by Jobcenter staff Jean-Marc Vincent on his blog in several posts.

In this context it is important to note that in August 2012, Mrs. Musati had unsuccessfully tried to force my father to delete a blog post or face a penalty payment of € 10,000 (ten thousand). The prosecutor of Munich has refused to follow up on this case which I view as a blatant cover up.

I have reason to believe that the criminal complaint of Mr. Sonneck was initiated by Mrs Musati in her repeated attempts to end the existence of the Jobcenter-critical blog and harm us financially. As managing director she runs the agency and is responsible for day-to-day operations.

In particular,  the Jobcenter Munich engaged and still engages in every conceivable way to put road blocks in my path of further education such as the refusal to pay for school transportation and, most viciously, suspend rent payments exactly at the time of renewal of the grant. This happened three times in a row with the implicit intent to render us homeless.

I have further reason to believe that Mrs Musati's intent was to see the publications about the continued discriminatory and racist machinations of the Jobcenter Munich against me purged from pubic view.

Count 2

The Jobcenter Munich took offense to the publication of certain statements made in connection with my person. These ware as follows:

The demand to see the school mid-term results, although no legal basis exists for this request. In addition, the statement alleged that I might need private lessons. This is an affront against me because nobody at the Jobcenter Munich has ever seen me, has ever talked with me, knows anything about me, except that I exist. Nobody ever cared about me. I have reasons to believe that my being a so-called migrant led to this assumption. I view such allegations as discriminating and potentially racist.

In addition, the suggestion to offer me private lessons looked like a decoy to furnish my mid-term results upon which the Jobcenter Munich would try to lure me out of school and into a low-wage job. This assumption is based on incidences reported in a SPIEGEL article titled 'By all means available' and another report in the same magazine.

Count 3

Further evidence for this assumption was the offer to help me in signing up for the German Labor Agency's job portal. The offer is firstly ludicrous as job offers can be seen without signing up and secondly, I am not looking for a job when my school term is for another one and a half years.

Count 4

It may be assumed that by offering help in signing up to the jobs portal the Jobcenter intended to get hold of my email address and cell phone number. It is a well-known fact and it has been widely reported in the press that the German Labor Agency scours the social networks and spies on people. As a matter of fact, the German Labor Agency BA has contacted software firms to this end.

Count 5

My father wrote about this incident in four blog posts. In one of them he used the image of Heinrich Himmler in Nazi uniform together with a pertinent quote made by Himmler. This quote stated that school education is granted with the express permission of the police only. The quote resembles in an uncanny way the ways and means in which the Jobcenter operates. The blog post is linked to the website of the German state media company RBB in Berlin. On this website are several Nazi images displayed. An assumption of any form of Nazi glorification is out of the question and absurd.

The Jobcenter subsequently took exception to this and by filing a complaint with the Munich police, the Jobcenter München intended to have this post purged and my father fined.

It is a blatant display of double standards by the Jobcenter Munich and its then man. director Musati. The Jobcenter would never dare to confront the German media for their rampant display of Nazi images and movies.

The blog posts of my father covered real life incidents perpetrated by a German government agency. By filing a complaint the Jobcenter Munich intended to infringe the constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of expression and the freedom of press because the Jobcenter does not want any critical reports about its conduct.
By repeated criminal complaints against my father the Jobcenter's intention is not based on seeing justice administered. It is based on crushing any dissent, on getting any negative reports about the Jobcenter deleted and, most importantly, on seeing us financially ruined, unable to pay the fines and subsequently getting my father imprisoned and me out of school.

§ 226 BGB declares the exercise of a right to be inadmissible if it can only have the purpose to inflict another's loss.

Lastly, Mr Sonneck's assertion that the term "sliming staff Jean-Marc Vincent" would qualify as libel is utterly ridiculous and raises doubts that he has the full grasp of the German language. The German Federal Constitutional Court has made several decisions on this subject.

Furthermore, when the Jobcenter Munich with its man. director Musati deems "silly question" to be libel, then I, a mere migrant that apart from German and English speaks the Hindi and Nepali language as well, have serious doubts about the intellectual capacity of staff in German government agencies.