Esteemed purveyor of the finest Bavarian justice chief prosecutor Hummer, has it perhaps touched the tympanic membrane of your ear when ...

Der einzige Patriotismus, 

der uns dem Westen nicht entfremdet, 

ist ein Verfassungspatriotismus.

J. Habermas

judge Bassler refused my right to a court-appointed lawyer, that the province of Bavaria is as a state of Greater Teutonia part of the EU and that said conglomerate of disparate nation states features a European Court?


Thus enlightened and before I cut to the chase, I deem it of some importance to keep in mind these points with my attached impressions based on my experience with a Bavarian court on various occasions:

• Validity of Human rights in Bavaria? Never heard of those.
• Adhering to decisions of the German constitutional court? You have to be kidding.
• Allegiance to the ECHR and Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU? Are you out of your mind, this is Bavaria.

And referring back to the European Court, it is proclaimed here the right to legal aid which is enshrined by:

• the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) - Article 6 (3)(c) of the ECHR guarantees the right to legal assistance where the defendant has insufficient means to pay for legal assistance, and to get free legal aid when the interest of justice so requires.
• the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 47 of the Charter stipulates that legal aid shall be made available to those who lack sufficient resources in so far as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice.

How did the Munich court decide when asked for legal assistance? It was a politely phrased 'GTFO'.

Thank you for granting me the opportunity to shed a light on some valid legal peculiarities.

Does/could the social environment of Mr. Hummer provide perhaps a sliver of a hint?