Required reading for Munich prosecutors Steinkraus-Koch, Schütz and Judge Birkhofer-Hoffmann, among various others!

Steinkraus-Koch

Schütz

I appreciate the noble efforts of the Munich court in collaboration with German government agencies - and Ministers, staying all in true German fashion quiet - to bring down this blog, get it purged. After all, free speech had never a tradition in Good Ol'. Oh and this here could possibly be yet another way to get uncomfortable blogs off the intertubes in Germany.

Anyway, I feel an urge to elevate the knowledge base of Munich prosecutors and judges somewhat, because during those days in which I had the privilege to lounge in their court rooms on admittedly uncomfortable chairs, deprived of my Montecristo and Hennessy, and listen to these supposedly educated gents and ladies, I rarely had the feeling of being overwhelmed by too much intelligence.

I endeavour to change this ever so slightly and therefore would like to usher their interested minds for example to the following excerpt being certain, said juristic individuals know exactly what I am referring to. Here goes:

Information  Note  on  the  Court’s  case-law  No.  116

February 2009

Sergey Zolotukhin v.  Russia [GC] - 14939/03

Judgment 10.2.2009 [GC]

Article 4 of Protocol No. 7

Right not to  be  tried  or punished  twice 

As to whether the offences were the same, the Court had adopted a variety of approaches in the past, placing the emphasis on identity of the facts irrespective of their legal characterisation, on the legal classification as the same set of facts could give rise to different offences, or on the existence of essential elements common to both offences. Taking the view that the existence of these different approaches was a source of legal uncertainty which was incompatible with the fundamental right guaranteed by Article 4 of Protocol No. 7, the Court decided to define in detail what was to be understood by the term “same offence” for the purposes of the Convention. After examining the scope of the right not to be tried and punished twice as set forth in other international instruments, in particular the United Nations Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights and the American Convention on Human Rights, it stated that Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 should be construed as prohibiting the prosecution or trial of an individual for a second offence in so far as it arose from identical facts or facts that were “substantially” the same as those underlying the first offence. This guarantee came into play where a new set of proceedings was instituted after a previous acquittal or conviction had acquired the force of res judicata.

In some places it is called Double Jeopardy.

It's a pleasure being of service.

Minister Andrea Nahles, you are aiding and abetting Nazi methods in stifling free speech in Germany! Come clean!

Justice is the bread of the nation;

it is always hungry for it.

François-René de Chateaubriand

German Minister of Labor Nahles,

In October 2015 our entire IT system was seized including the Mac Book Pro of my daughter.

This was perpetrated under breach of the constitutionally guaranteed right to freedom of expression. Furthermore, it was planned to have my daughter frisked and her smartphone confiscated by three police. Our rooms were photographed and the house from the outside. This fits no rule of law. These are blatant Nazi methods!

With 99% certainty an individual of either the Jobcenter, the Agency of Labor BA, or a goon submitted a criminal complaint by email from the IP address 217.253.91.237 under a false name!

Since weeks you adamantly refuse any communication with me on this as would be expected from a person with professional and integer standards. Your conduct is appalling!

As the Minister of Labor you are ultimately responsible for the conduct of staff of agencies under your Ministry's legal supervision. You fail miserably on all counts and lack any sort of integrity.

My daughter's Mac Book was returned in April damaged.

• The Mac Book now has two scratches on the left side of the display.
• The track pad is damaged and can not be operated properly.
• The Mac can not be sold in this condition.

As was expected, the Munich court did not feel obliged to respond to a letter of April 28, 2016 from my daughter asking for damages. Talk about a Banana Republic.

I expect full reimbursement for the computer or an equivalent Apple notebook from the German government! And I expect that ASAP!

Sincerely,

______________
Mac Book Pro

Model
MBP 13.3/2.3/2x2GB/320/SD/GLSY

Munich public prosecutor
Linprunstraße 25
80097 München

April 28, 2016

AZ: 112 Js 168454/15 - OL no. 2595/2016 - Lfd.Nr. 8

I'm a Man

RocknRolla

That gender equality and diversity thing

"Rigorous pursuit of equality of opportunity exclusively within the terms of given patterns of capitalist class relations—which is after all the ideal of racial liberalism—has been fully legitimized within the rubric of “diversity.” That  ideal  is  realized  through  gaining  rough parity  in  distribution  of social  goods and  bads among designated population categories.  As Walter Benn Michaels has argued powerfully, according to that ideal, the society would be just if 1 percent of the population controlled 90 percent of the resources, provided that blacks and other nonwhites, women, and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people were represented  among  the  1  percent  in  roughly similar proportion as their incidence in the general population.

 Given the triumph of racial liberalism, it is entirely possible that new discourses of ascriptive difference might take shape that fit the folk common sense of our time and its cultural norms and sensibilities. Indeed, the explosive resurgence in recent years of academically legitimated determinist discourses—all of which simply rehearse the standard idealist tropes and circular garbage in/garbage out faux scientific narratives—reinforce that concern.

The undergirding premises of intellectual programs like evolutionary psychology, behavioral economics, genes and politics, and neurocriminology are strikingly like straight-line extrapolations from  Victorian race science— although for the most part, though not entirely, scholars operating in those areas are scrupulous, or at least fastidious, in not implicating the familiar racial taxonomies in their deterministic sophistries. Some scholars imagine that “epigenetics”—a  view that focuses on the interplay of genes and environment in producing organisms and genotypes—avoids determinism by providing causal explanations that are not purely biological. Recent research purporting to find epigenetic explanations for socioeconomic inequality already foreshadows a possible framework for determinist “underclass” narratives  that avoid  the  taints  associated  with  biological  justifications of  inequality and  references to currently recognized racial categories."

Marx, Race, and Neoliberalism

Adolph Reed, Jr.

German Minister of Justice Heiko Maas explains hate speech and 'Suck my dick'.

Heiko Mass losing his sartorial bearings

This is Heiko Maas with his new retreaded muse Natalia Wörner. She excelled early on by switching schools frequently and dispensing of any vocational education.

Instead, she threw her voluptuous body head over heels into the genre of, err, Art. This qualified her to 'Suck my dick' and to continue dazzling demented German cinema aficionados with her third rate performance as an actress.

The picture of the two lovebirds is a typical example of how a woman can sartorially torment a decent male being with the towering presence of 172 cm from head to toe and turn him into a ridiculous looking dick. Is is a shame and shows yet again how we male human beings suffer under the bad influence of women.

As is well known, the able Minister of Justice who never practiced law in his entire life (so much about the vaunted "Fachkräfte" in Germany) goes full metal jacket and bonkers when it comes to sexism in adverts. The mere thought of such acts of degrading precious human beings of the weak sex will trigger his guanine crystals and make him scream for a law against such perversity. Yet being a politician, double standards are a routine assuetude and vacuity a given, even more so when the intellect is at times dick-driven.

It then comes as no surprise that this display in the German Playboy magazine is not

Natalia Wörner, releasing pressure from
Heiko's Cervélo tube.

in any way to be construed as sexist but a visual ode to the Rebirth of Christ as a Woman. Amen.

Enough of the Minister's dilly dallying populist "Schrullen", let's turn to the real subject that irks him: HATE SPEECH.

Hate speech on this American Facebook and this American Twitter, this American Google, and it is here that The Heiko is running a vendetta.

To napalm Free Speech Hate Speech into German oblivion, The Heiko has surrounded himself with the Knights Templar, aka the Order of Teutonia's Temple. To add some punch a Stasi Connection completes the picture. Let the able Minister explain what constitutes Hate Speech in good ol' Germany.

Here is an example of vicious Hate Speech in Germany. An example of the inherent dangers of Hate Speech to the state, so dangerous that armed police had to be deployed, a blogger to be frisked, photos of the premises to be taken and all IT equipment plus smartphone confiscated.

Considered to be Hate speech in Germany

The lesson to be learnt?

Just don't fuck around with the German Minister of Justice Fatzke Heiko Maas, the Terminator of Free Speech Hate Speech. He will crush you with a vengeance.

Heiko Maas, the German Hugues de Payons

Richard Feynman playing the bongo

and a professional on some kind of Bongo

Nigerian 419 hat mehr Stil als Jobcenter München

Nigerian 419 gentleman

Die Bundesbeauftragte für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit
Husarenstr. 30
53117 Bonn

05.10.2016

Beschwerde über Jobcenter München

Sehr geehrte Frau Voßhoff,

Ich bin der Vater meiner mittlerweile fast 21-jährigen Tochter, die nach ihrem Abitur nun seit 1. Sept. 2016 eine Vollzeitstelle hat und erhielt vom Jobcenter München (im Folgenden JCM) ein Schreiben vom 15.09.2016 mit Poststempel 23.09.2016 und der Aufforderung, den Arbeitsvertrag, den Nettoverdienst als auch den "Nachweis über den Zufluss des Einkommens (Kontoauszüge bzw. Barquittung)" meiner Tochter bis zum 02. 10.2016 enzureichen. Das Schreiben trug keinen persönlichen Namen, sondern stammte vom 'Team Selbständige'! Die Existenz dieses Teams ist uns neu.

Dazu scheinen mir mehrere Dinge kommentierungswürdig. Zum einen scheint das JCM nicht zu wissen, wann Volljährigkeit besteht, es sei denn, man ist ganz von der neoliberalen Paralleljustiz des SGB II eingenommen. Ich denke, jedoch meine Tochter sollte der korrekte Adressat sein für dieses Boudoir der Niederträchtigkeit, zumal ich nicht in die Kontobewegungen meiner Tochter blicke und auch nicht in den Arbeitsvertrag, der ohnehin das naseweisige JCM eine mit Feuchtigkeit durchsetzte Erde angeht. Gut, dass ich dies gleich final klären durfte in meiner bekannt attraktiv offenen Art.

Zum anderen, und hier wende ich mich nun an Sie als Datenschutzbrauftragte, verlangt ein 'Team Selbständige', also eine anonyme Gruppe, persönliche Unterlagen meiner Tochter. Es wäre nicht das JCM, wenn es nicht auch um Betrug (§ 263 StGB) ginge, wie z. B. meine Strafanzeige gegen JCM Mitarbeiter vom 17.09.2016 zeigt wegen des versuchten Abzockens des Ferienverdienstes meiner Tochter.

In diesem Schreiben erfand das 'Team Selbständige' einfach Geldbeträge, um die Sozialleistungen zu drücken. Siehe den angeblichen Verdienst meiner Tochter von € 2.000,- Netto (!!!) oder die angeblichen € 190 Kindergeld (!). Eine Berufstätige bezieht also für ihre eigene Person Kindergeld?!

Ist Ihnen, verehrte Frau Voßhoff, etwas bekannt geworden über Alkoholismus im Jobcenter München, Koks gesnifft? € 2.000 Netto setzen einen Bruttoverdienst von ca. € 3.200 voraus. Dieses Land, regiert von der Plunse aus der DDR, ist doch ein Billiglohn-Land bittascheen.

Nun will ich mich diesem 'Team Selbständige' zuwenden, denn dieser Begriff ist wie gesagt absolut neu. Wochen vorher wurden wir von einer Frau Ehrhard angeschrieben, dann trat jemand mit Namen Preukschat in Erscheinung. Seltsam, finden Sie nicht auch? Beide Personen, wie typisch für die Sozialverbrecherbehörde Jobcenter, antworten nicht auf Emails.

Zwei Emailanfragen nach dem vollständigen Namen des Sachbearbeiters blieben, wie bei dieser verrotteten Behörde üblich, unbeantwortet. Selbst Nigerian 419 Scammer haben den Anstand, einen Namen zu nennen. Das hebt sich angenehm ab von der Kundenorientiertheit der reichsdeutschen Billig-Lohn-Mafia Behörde Jobcenter.

Persönliche Dokumente an ein anonymes 'Team' zu senden; also wie primitiv muss eine solche Behörde sein? Was hat diese Behörde zur Vermittlung von Billiglohn Jobs zu verbergen? Hinzu kommt, an wen kann man sich später wenden, wen kann man später bei Bedarf verklagen?

Es ist bedauerlich, dass die blonde Gfin des JCM Anette Farrenkopf nicht den Beschluss des Landesarbeitsgericht  Schleswig Aktenzeichen: 3  Sa  305/07 öD 6  Ca  955  b/07 ArbG  Lübeck kennt. Ja selbst die Provinz Bayern scheint ihr unbekannt zu sein (http://www.datenschutz-bayern.de/tbs/tb22/k19.html#19.1).

Doch, werte Frau Voßhoff, es gibt auch gute Nachricht! Der Europäische Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte EGMR in Strasbourg scheint sich für unsere Beschwerde zu interessieren. Wir reichten diese Beschwerde ein, nachdem wir von dem Jobcenter MA Jürgen Sonneck angezeigt wurden und vom Kangaroo Court München ich in allen Instanzen für schuldig befunden wurde. Alles Nähere finden Sie startend von hier:

http://meinjobcenter.blogspot.com/2016/10/good-and-encouraging-news-from-echr-in.html

Ich darf mich nun entschuldigen, um die zweite Betrugsanzeige gegen diese neoliberale Kaschemme aufzusetzen, die natürlich wie üblich von der verrotteten Münchner Justiz abgelehnt wird. Einen netten korrupten Staat haben die Deutschen hier.

Mit besten Grüssen

"John" - seriöser als jeder Jobcenter MA