Religion, Division of Labor and Conflict: Anti-Semitism in German Regions over 600 Years

German Prez Steinmeier is displeased: "It shames me and it hurts me that anti-Semitism in Germany - especially here! - Again, more often and openly shows his grotesque grimace".

Chancellor Merkel feels the young generation must be told over and over again, "what has made the story of terrible what emanated from German soil".

The anti-Semitism commissioner of the Federal Government, Felix Klein, should be an authority on the subject but seems a little clueless and wishes to counteract:

"The anti-Semitism commissioner of the Federal Government, Felix Klein, expressed concern the increasing anti-Semitism. He told the Evangelical Press Service (epd) that the rise of such crimes was so high that he considered it "extremely alarming". According to the statistics of politically motivated crime, anti-Semitic offenses in 2018 saw an increase of almost 20 percent to 1,799 offenses (2017: 1,504), of which nearly 70 were violent. According to statistics, this is the highest level since 2006. Klein demanded: "We must now mobilize all our political and civic forces to counteract this development.""

According to German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas, who claimed it was the Holocaust that got him into politics, Anti-Semitism is

"A shame for the society that allows that" and "Many migrants have been vaccinated anti-Semitic clichés".

Had this political lightweight taken the liberty to consult history he would know better. In particular about his own people. Here are some historic quotes:

Martin Luther (1483-1546): “The Jews deserve to hang on gallows, seven times higher than ordinary thieves.” And: “We ought to take revenge on the Jews and kill them.”

Immanuel Kant (1724-1804): The Jews are by nature “sharp dealers” who are “bound together by superstition.” Their “immoral and vile” behavior in commerce shows that they “do not aspire to civic virtue,” for “the spirit of usury holds sway amongst them.” They are “a nation of swindlers” who benefit only “from deceiving their host’s culture.”

And one of the greatest German philosophers:

G. W. F. Hegel (1770-1831): Germany cannot assimilate the Jews because the Jews live an “animal existence that can only be secured at someone else’s expense.” Also: “Spirit alone recognizes spirit. They [the Jews] saw in Jesus only the man ... for He was only one like themselves, and they felt themselves to be nothing. The Jewish multitude was bound to wreck His attempt to give them the consciousness of something divine, for faith in something divine, something great, cannot make its home in a dunghill.”

Pretty strong stuff. Besides, this is not the realm in which young coathanger Heiko operates. You will find him in the ready-to-wear suit department. Brioni is out of the question.

These days, Anti-Semitism and in particular AS in recent years in Germany is typically being blamed on the far right, so-called Neonazis which is an interested misnomer as it conveniently distracts from historic facts (see Adorno, Aspekte des neuen Rechtsradikalismus). It is further held against the AfD as a political means. IOW, Jews are instrumentalized in Germany.

The following paper debunks this overly simplistic view. As so often in life, phobia, fear, hate, and discrimination have economic roots.

Religion, Division of Labor and Conflict: Anti-Semitism in German Regions over 600 Years

Anti-Semitism continues to be a widespread societal problem rooted deeply in history. Using novel city-level data from Germany for more than 1,000 cities as well as county-level data, we study the role of economic incentives in shaping the co-existence of Jews, Catholics and Protestants. 

The Catholic ban on usury.

The Catholic ban on usury gave Jews living in Catholic regions a specific advantage in the moneylending sector. Following the Protestant Reformation (1517), the Jews lost this advantage in regions that became Protestant but not in those regions that remained Catholic. 

We show that 

1) the Protestant Reformation induced a change in the geography of anti-Semitism with persecutions of Jews and anti-Jewish publications becoming more common in Protestant areas relative to Catholic areas;
2) this change was more pronounced in cities where Jews had already established themselves as moneylenders;
3) the Reformation reduced the specialization of Jews in the financial sector in Protestant regions but not in Catholic regions. 

The Protestant Reformation and its economic effect on the Jews.

We interpret these findings as evidence that, following the Protestant Reformation, the Jews living in Protestant regions lost their comparative advantage in lending. This change exposed them to competition with the Christian majority leading, eventually, to an increase in anti-Semitism.

In summary, using a combination of city-level and county-level data, we show that the Protestant Reformation induced the following changes: 

1) Jewish pogroms, the expulsion of Jews and anti-Semitic attitudes (captured by anti-Jewish publications and votes for anti-Semitic parties) worsened in regions that became Protestant compared to those that remained Catholic.
2) This increase in anti-Semitism in Protestant regions was more accentuated in regions in which Jewish moneylending had been established before the Reformation.
3) Jewish involvement in finance and banking decreased in the Protestant regions relative to the regions that remained Catholic.

We interpret these findings as evidence that with the Reformation, the Jews lost their comparative advantage in lending. This change exposed them to competition with the Christian majority and led to an increase in ethnic and religious hostility toward the Jews.

VI. Conclusion

In the debate on the determinants of anti-Semitism, economic factors have received little attention. Although there is no doubt that cultural and political factors are at play, we show that economic factors also play a role. Using data on German cities and regions over six centuries, we show that the geography of anti-Semitism is related to the geography of economic interactions between the Jewish minority and the Christian majority. The Catholic ethics of usury and higher levels of human capital with respect to the majority population gave to the Jewish minority a comparative advantage in moneylending in Catholic regions. This produced a complementarity between Jews and Christians that was broken up in Protestant areas after the Reformation. Jews were by no means sheltered from pogroms even in Catholic areas, as evidenced by the well- known pogroms after the Black Death in 1349, well before the Reformation. However, our results document that anti-Semitic acts and attitudes became relatively more frequent in Protestant areas relative to Catholic areas after the Reformation. We show that this differential effect of the Reformation is largely driven by the set of cities with documented Jewish lending activity before the Reformation and that, after the Reformation, Jews lost their prerogatives in banking and finance in Protestant Germany but not in Catholic Germany.

The effects of the division of labor on anti-Semitism.

Our findings are important for both researchers and policymakers. For researchers, they provide empirical evidence that systematically identifies the effects of the division of labor on anti-Semitism. ... For policymakers who are willing to learn from history, our results suggest that anti-Semitism, and inter-ethnic conflict more generally, does respond to economic incentives. This is an important finding in light of ongoing contemporary ethnic conflicts worldwide.

Unfortunately, you can not win voters for your political party when you blame your own society's knitting.

Institutional racism in the German police got NSU things done

Sometimes the raw efficiency of the German police is frightening. Frightening in the sense of is it just plain stupidity, intent, or the combination of both?

During the "investigations" of the National Socialist Underground murders between 2000 and 2007 throughout Germany a profiler of the LKA Baden-Wurttemberg made a blatant analyses when he stated:

"Against the background that the killing of people in our cultural area is covered with a high taboo, it can be deduced that the perpetrator is located with regard to his behavior system far outside the local normative and value system. [...] Also, the rigid code of conduct that characterizes the group is more in favor of grouping in Eastern and Southern Europe (not European Western background)."

"Vor dem Hintergrund, dass die Tötung von Menschen in unserem Kulturraum mit einem hohen Tabu belegt ist, ist abzuleiten, dass der Täter hinsichtlich seines Verhaltenssystems weit außerhalb des hiesigen Normen- und Wertesystems verortet ist. […] Auch spricht der die Gruppe prägende rigide Ehrenkodex eher für eine Gruppierung im ost- bzw. südeuropäischen Raum (nicht europäisch westlicher Hintergrund)".

From the German language 'die Schneeflocke' lawyer blog.

The blog title runs "Missed oppertunity", implying that German authorities missed and failed to properly investigate the Neonazi killings. Unfortunately, the author(s) of the blog missed the opportunity to debunk the whole myth of any serious intent to get to the bottom of those heinous crimes and the fact that obfuscation was the official order from day one. And that order came from the very top.

The National Socialist Underground murders cover-up in Munich's court

Munich, where else! Reliable. Efficient when it comes to cover Neonazis.

The whole stinking shit is winding down. Disgusting. Here is one more of the victims speaking. There are more posts on those revolting killings. Never trust a German, and on that flippant remark the 100th anniversary of the publication of 'Der Untergang des Abendlandes' might be just a coincidence.

"But one thing we can do: Do ​​not stop asking."

Closing speech by Yvonne Boulgaridis

On 7.2. In 2018, the pleadings of the co-plaintiffs and their lawyers were terminated. In the end, the pleadings of Yvonne Boulgaridis and RA Yavuz Narin were a worthy summary of many previous pleadings. We are pleased that both allow us to publish these pleas here. You can find the press reaction to the pleadings here for ZEIT-Online , SPIEGEL-Online and Süddeutsche.

I am Yvonne Boulgarides.

Theo Boulgarides, my husband and father of my daughters, Mandy and
Michalina was brutally executed on 15.06.2005.

1.
Some years ago I made a speech in Munich, which I with a
Quotation from Albert Einstein ended:
"One should never stop asking"

All the victims have not stopped asking, but it is us
allegedly "complete enlightenment" so many answers remained guilty.

To this day I want to know why the reputation of my family in the
Public was dismantled in this way.

Has we been pushed into the role of offender to our unpleasant questions
to silence? Or were the authorities actually
on a, for me incomprehensible, wrong path?

How come so many witnesses involved in the investigation
their interrogations are affected by an epidemic-like memory loss
were?

Why did not get V-men and employees of the security authorities
proactively get a full approval certificate?

Why were and will these people who are quite obviously at the
Exercising your duty miserably failed, protected?

Second
Why was this protection not given to the victims and their families?

How many victims would have been spared us if the commissioned
State organs have done their work honorably and dutifully?

Why, despite ongoing investigations, thousands of
Shredded file pages?

Why were numerous V-persons and suspected NSU supporters up
not heard properly today?

Where are all those who through their negligent or intentional action
have made these crimes possible?
Why do not you have any consequences to worry about? Why are they even going?
[as Lothar Lingen purposely destroyed files]
Protected law enforcement?

It would have been the task of the corresponding state organs, the
To serve the truth. Unfortunately at this point I have to go from one
speak complete organ failure.

All the sometimes absurd explanations and explanations have us still
left more questions, mistrust and uncertainty.

Full post here and in German.

When you absolutlely, positively want to cover up state-sponsored Neonazi killings of immigrants, nothing beats a Munich court

After all, they have some credentials going for them. Like how about a Neonazi judge? Or the conspicuous reluctance of bringing to light the true story behind the Oktoberfestattentat in 1980. Yep, that's right, 37 years gone by.

In all seriousness, how on earth could they choose Munich/Bavaria as the place of this trial back then?

Yet it makes perfect sense. From the beginning it was crystal clear: this was going to be a cover-up from A to Z. Witnesses disappeared/died/killed. Files disappeared. After all, they had their three red herrings. Just by looking at those blokes it was clear, they could never have accomplished all those killings alone. The plot was way too intricate.

And what a cover-up is has become. A true simulacrum.

SIMULACRUM (simulacra): Something that replaces reality with its representation. Jean Baudrillard in "The Precession of Simulacra" defines this term as follows: "Simulation is no longer that of a territory, a referential being, or a substance. It is the generation by models of a real without origin or reality: a hyperreal.... It is no longer a question of imitation, nor duplication, nor even parody. It is a question of substituting the signs of the real for the real" (1-2). His primary examples are psychosomatic illness, Disneyland, and Watergate. Fredric Jameson provides a similar definition: the simulacrum's "peculiar function lies in what Sartre would have called the derealization of the whole surrounding world of everyday reality" 

 From the point of view of the victums it is a resounding slap in the face and this in a country that claims its intention of integrating foreigners. A disgusting performance of a kangaroo court. A white wash of the state, the police, the "justice" system, politicians, you name it. The Ugly German reared his/her face again. Yet they have their hypocritic Collective Guilt enshrined here, a kick in the face of Free Speech. At a total cost of some 15 million euro or so for this judicial shindig, it is a steal. Though, for entertainment's sake they could have performed some "Shava, Shava" in the court room.

. . . . . . .

From SPIEGEL magazine (unedited Google translate)

Attorney-at-law attorney in the NSU trial"Not a single critical question"

NSU really only consists of three members? Attorney-at-law attorney Stephan Kuhn raises serious allegations against the federal prosecutor's office. It protects state organs - even before too much elucidation.

An interview by Julia Jüttner

The NSU process now takes four and a half years. On this Tuesday, Federal Chancellor Herbert Diemer will demand the sentence for the defendants Beate Zschäpe, Ralf Wohlleben, Holger G., Carsten S. and André E. in his plea. Subsequently, the adjudicators will begin their final speeches.

Usually, the interests of prosecution and subclaim are close to one another in main negotiations, and they generally have the same goal: to bring the defendants accountable for their deeds. But in the NSU process , the relationship between the Federal Prosecutor's Office and the other prosecutors is remarkably tense.

How can this be explained? And what gaps do lawyers see in the investigations? Adjunct representative Stephan Kuhn gives answers.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Mr. Kuhn, is there a conflict between federal prosecutor's office and secondary court in the NSU proceedings?

Stephan Kuhn: Yes, because many of the adjuncts wanted a ruthless elucidation of the NSU complex right from the beginning. But at the latest with the prosecution, it was clear that the Federal Prosecutor's Office had unnecessarily pointed out that the NSU was an isolated three-party cell - without any helpers and helpers in the crime scene. In addition, the prosecution showed that the Federal Prosecutor's Office wants to keep the constitutional protection largely out of the procedure - and so does state protection.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: How is state protection operated? You must explain that.

Kuhn: Of the circa 40 now well-known V-people, informers and guarantors of the security authorities from the vicinity of Mundlos, Böhnhardt and Zschäpe, only three were listed in the impeachment. The importance of further V-people was shown, however, when V-men charged at the request of the secondary accusation were interrogated in court for several days. From my point of view, more V-people would have to be invited as witnesses.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: The investigation had shown no evidence of a criminal involvement of state agencies, says the federal prosecutor. How do you assess the role of the authority?

Kuhn: Unfortunately, the federal prosecutor is not a politically independent law enforcement body. The prosecutor of the prosecutor is rather a political official and is under the supervision of the Federal Minister of Justice. As such, he already has to take into account the statutory requirements of the government according to the legal requirements. The Federal Prosecutor's Office has operated state protection in a comprehensive sense in the NSU procedure - in other words, protection against too much elucidation and a consequent damage to the protection of the constitution. How the position of the Federal Prosecutor is to be assessed is, ultimately, a question of a legal policy. I think it is very problematic, as much in the area of ​​criminal law.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Are you accusing the federal prosecutor of deliberately protecting state institutions?

Kuhn: Yes, I do not remember a single critical question or statement from the Federal Prosecutor's office against the witnesses of constitutional protection in the four and a half years of the trial, even though they obviously did not take it so closely with the truth.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: What role did constitutional protection and the investigating authorities in your opinion in the NSU case?

Kuhn: The V-man Tino Brandt has fundamentally built up the Thuringian Homeland Security with funds of the constitutional protection - he should have received a total of approximately 200,000 DM. In this right-wing group the radicalization of Böhnhardt, Mundlos and Zschap took place, with this money Brandt supported her submerge. If the intelligence services and the investigating authorities had done everything in their power, the three could have already been arrested in Chemnitz and thus before the murders - the necessary insights were available.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: They also accuse the Federal Prosecutor's Office of depriving the sub-plaintiffs of essential parts of the case. As the?

Kuhn: We have not got a complete view of the files in the nine other investigations against separately pursued potential supporters; as well as in the structural procedure in which there are still unknown sponsors, in particular against arms suppliers. We could not even look into individual interrogatory protocols from these procedures by potential supporters and neo-Nazis from the vicinity of Mundlos, Böhnhardt and Zschäpe.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: But they were not part of this process.

Kuhn: Yes, just. The Federal Prosecutor's Office has structured the investigations in such a way as to be able to decide which results of the investigation must be presented to the court - and which are not. If, for example, the prosecutor's office did not wish the parties to the proceedings to be aware of an interrogation, he had interrogated the witness during the structural procedure. Thus, he had the legal leeway to not submit the interrogation to the court.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: The subcompetition was able to defend itself with its own arguments - and has done so in immense scope.

Kuhn: Partially, however, the Federal Prosecutor's Office had heard witnesses, but this was not communicated to the other parties to the proceedings but instead requested the Senate to reject the request and not invite these witnesses. In this way, the Federal Prosecutor's Office has used its position in a way which makes it appear that it fears that certain investigations could reach the public.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Do you have an example?

Kuhn: The sub-court accused in court that a former employee of the Federal Constitutional Protection, with the camouflage name Lothar Lingen, had intentionally destroyed files and applied for his cargo. The Federal Prosecutor's Office rejected this assertion: this is speculative. Lingen had already admitted against the federal prosecutor's office that these files had been intentionally destroyed, so that their content would not be known. He said that with the multitude of V people in Thuringia, no one else would have believed the Federal Constitutional Protection that he had known nothing about the NSU.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: In relation to possible other perpetrators, Federal Prosecutor Herbert Diemer spoke in his plea of ​​"lunatic lights" and "flying humming". Are you taking these attacks seriously or is that part of the procedural ban?

Kuhn: As far as the attacks on us are lawyers, I am more amused. What annoys me is disrespect to the victims and their relatives. Representatives of a state still deeply interwoven with the right scene are doing badly to counter the hope of the victims of enlightenment with such arrogance.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Attorney General Anette Greger even claimed that some of the adjuncts had "promised" their clients that "right hind men" would have been given to the crime scene. For this, neither the BKA's investigations nor the investigation committees, nor the court proceedings, had given any indications. What do you think?

Kuhn: The enlightenment of the rear-men, Mrs. Merkel, has promised in her speech at the Staatsstrauerakt in 2012. We do not speak of ambassadors, but are convinced after the evidence that the NSU core trio had supporters who at least partly knew of concrete acts. After so many years - the last murder in 2007 - it is also extremely difficult to determine such holdings.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: The Federal Prosecutor's Office has justified its thesis, which only Böhnhardt, Mundlos and Zschäpe, as well as the four co-defendants as perpetrators see, in the pleadings. What do you think of this assumption?

Kuhn: I'm sure there were more winners. The fact is that especially "Blood & Honor" members in Chemnitz knew that the NSU was an armed underground cell. They supported them at least in the period before the first acts. In the last apartment of Mundlos, Böhnhardt and Zschäpe were found explosives and 20 firearms - 17 of them the origin is not clarified. This is a clear indication of further supporters, which the Federal Prosecutor has not yet determined. Just as there are further references to people in the environment that could not be identified.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Which would be?

Kuhn: At the last caravan rental a girl was present, which also resided in the caravan. Although there is DNA, it could not be identified - that is, it does not belong to the already known accused or separately persecuted persons. But the parents must have been so close to the three that they put the girl in their care. From mobile phones, contacts of the three submerged persons result to persons, which could not be identified afterwards. In addition, according to the investigations of the BKA, a confederation of the "Nürnberger Nachrichten" was thrown into the mailbox. Zschap was, after all we know, not there. So it must have someone else thrown in.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: But the evidence in court is not enough to cover a larger group of helpers.

Kuhn: Because the investigations by the Federal Prosecutor's Office - apart from the first two years of the descent - very little on the whole thirteen years of the core triad in the ground. This was, in my opinion, also due to the early conclusion that NSU was an isolated three-cell system. However, the court and all other parties to the proceedings must work on the basis of those investigations. Therefore , the main negotiation could not provide any comprehensive evidence of a larger NSU network. Unfortunately, the court rejected applications for the subcompetition which, from our point of view, could have brought further clarification on the question of helpers at the crime scene.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: In the NSU process, there are 70 attorney-lawyers. How did you feel the collaboration?

Kuhn: Personally, I have never experienced such a good teamwork. I also feel as part of this interview, at least for the group of my colleagues with whom I worked closely. My findings and views expressed here are also based on their work.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: It is said that in the pleadians, relatives or injured would also speak. Why is that important?

Kuhn: There are survivors who have not spoken as witnesses. You will finally have the opportunity to present what the murders, their reverberations in the media, and the partial structural racist investigations have caused them.Despite the high-political content of the entire complex, one must not forget that the Nazis were not the German state, but concrete people and their relatives.

Heiko Maas, about that unrelenting Nazi propaganda shit on your German TV channels. Based on compulsory fee, that is!

Censorship in Germany

Dear Minister of Justice Mass,

We are writing to you about the unrelenting so-called documentaries on several German TV channels about the Nazi era. TV, that is funded by a compulsory fee! Not even Goebbels came up with that idea.

To our knowledge these documentaries are being aired since at least 15 years. We, that is my daughter and I, had the questionable pleasure to be introduced to these documentaries since 2006. At first we thought this to be a temporary episode, but you Germans just can't let go. This is a 'Dauerbrenner' of epic proportions.

As much as we try, we can not see let alone understand, in what way these so-called documentaries could possibly explain the real reasons for the rise of National-Socialism in Germany. As a matter of fact, we view them as a latent glorification of that time.  I consider FA Hayek's 'The Socialist Roots  of Naziism' much more to the point and convincing. Of course, it makes for very inconvenient TV coverage. The truth is sometimes so obvious and in your party face. This excerpt of Hayek's treatise covers important historical facts that explain the rise of National-Socialism:

What, then, caused  these views held by  a reactionary  minority finally  to  gain  the support of' the  great majority  of Germans  and  practically  the  whole of Germany's youth?  It was not  merely  the  defeat,  the  suffering,  and the wave  of nationalism  which  led to their  success.  Still  less was  the  cause, as so  many people  wish  to  believe, a  capitalist reaction  against the advance of socialism. On  the  contrary,  the  support  which  brought these  ideas  to power came precisely  from  the socialist camp.  It was certainly not through  the  bourgeoisie,  but rather through  the  absence  of a strong  bourgeoisie,  that  they  were  helped to power.  The doctrines  which had guided  the  ruling  elements in  Germany for  the  past  generation  were  opposed  not to the socialism  in  Marxism  but to the liberal  elements  contained  in it, its internationalism  and its  democracy.  And as it became  increasingly  clear that it  was  just  these elements  which formed obstacles to the realization  of socialism, the socialists of  the  Left approached more and  more  to  those  of  the Right. It was  the  union  of  the  anticapitalist forces  of  the  Right and  of the Left, the fusion of  radical and  conservative socialism,  which drove out from  Germany  everything  that  was  liberal.

We do understand that makes for uncomfortable reading. Granted, watching fat Goering waddle along in a splendid white uniform beats Liberace hands down and gazing along Speerian monumental granite buildings leaves Zara Hadid in the lurch. But hey, don't you think enough is enough and some truth would be in order?

Just a couple months back on a Saturday or Sunday at around 4 PM I learned in one episode that "the French army was still adhering to LINEAR war tactics while the German army was much more ... whatever". I could not care less, Minister. On May 1, 2016, exactly at 3:15 PM on Ntv, I could listen to some splendid logical bullshit: "You could view the war as a stepping stone towards what we call today 'Emancipation of women'". The context being that all male where in the army and the women had to work in munitions factories. Pardon my French, but are you Germans fkn nuts? We both know, this is a classic post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy.

Well, we do know a couple of guys at the Bavarian courts who really, really love this Nazi shit. One Munich prosecutor even had the audacity to explicitly forbid me criticizing those NS documentaries, because they all contribute to educating and explaining those dreadful times, he claimed. Apparently, when you are a prosecutor in a court system with a certain documented Neonazi affinity, a rational argument can easily be replaced by a mere statement.

These commenters on Spiegel do not seem to agree with the Bavarian view. The general tenor of the comments being, it's enough, real clarification of facts would be something else, jumping the shark, mere space filler, making money.

It does not quite make sense when rigged Bavarian courts, in order to shut down a critical blog, invoke the article 86a STGB while at the same time airwaves and newspapers just can't get enough of cool Hitler, Himmler, Goering.

We are expecting your answer on these issues ASAP! Because your fucking courts' computer confiscations get on our fucking nerves. That thing we treasure is called Free Speech! Have you heard of it? The next email is in the works.

Thanks,

Pssst, wir sind die Elfen vom Bundesverfassungsgericht und, äh, die Meinungsfreiheit endet "bei nicht mehr kontrollierbaren Personenkreisen".

Prätenziöse Elfe (Zerohedge) F. Kirchhof v. BVerfG
(Bild: Die Welt)

Psst, wir sind vom Bundesverfassungsgericht. Sssssccchhhht, nicht so laut. Also diese Chose da mit dem, ehem, Holocaust, also den Dingen die man da so assoziiert, - wobei man ja hört und das ist von diesem britischen Internet, also politisch völlig inkorrekt und auch nicht unsere Meinung widerspiegelnd, soll Hitler ja, übrigens wie Pol Pot, eine Menge medizinische Forschung betrieben haben, ohne Tiere zu Schaden kommen zu lassen (4:08) - also man sollte das alles nicht so heiss essen, wie's gekocht wird.

Leugnen des Holocausts ist cool mit uns vom BVerfG
und kann unter die grundgesetzlich geschützte freie Meinungsäusserung fallen. Jawoll.

Es muss nur, denn wir sind ja so muffelnde Deutsche und Fritzln auch gerne, es muss nur im Rahmen bleiben. Überschaubar und nur im engsten Personenkreis. Under cover of the night. Wenn das garantiert ist, hey, dann sind wir vom BVerfG absolut cool mit dem Leugnen des Holocausts. Kein Scheiss und da wir vom BVerfG sind, haben wir das auch geschickt phrasiert, und das geht dann pixelförmig so ab:

Johannes Masing in full Spanish hope-crushing garb

"Entscheidendes Kriterium, ob ein Verbreiten vorliegt, ist nach hergebrachtem Verständnis stets, dass eine Schrift einem größeren, nicht mehr kontrollierbaren Personenkreis zugänglich gemacht wird" (1)

Sind wir nicht gut!! Prosaisch für den verschwitzten Normalverbraucher, so meinen wir in unseren roten spanischen Kutten vom verfassungsschützenden Gewerbe, heisst dass ganz simpel: raunzt euch im engen Familien- und Freundeskreis einen runter über diesen ganzen, pfffft, Holocaust ...., zieht am besten die Gardinen zu und alles ist A-OK. Hat sich vor 80 Jahren auch bewährt.

BVerfG: Holocaust Verleugnung im engen Personenkreis
ist freie Meinungsäusserung. Total A-OK!

Wird allerdings "eine Schrift einem größeren, nicht mehr kontrollierbaren Personenkreis zugänglich gemacht", dann ist aber beim BVerfG die sprichwörtliche Kacke am dampfen. Schluss mit lustig, denn, und nu horsch a mal her, Deutschland hat eine Bringschuld, Reputation, ein Standing und das wollen die natürlich nach Aussen zynisch etabliert sehen. Window dressing. Props for the show. Spin Doctors. Was ist unsere Show? Na, wir sind Exportweltmeister.

Unter diesem Szenario verbietet sich jegliche Kritik am Schmierstoff der neoliberalen Ökonomie, Hartz IV !

Also da werden wir in unseren Kutten gallig. Grundgesetzbrechenden Zwangsmassnahmen, gar rassistische Unterstellungen, Bestrebungen übermässig lange und überflüsige Schulausbildung zu kürzen,  mit Kritik zu begegnen, strapaziert unsere verfassungsschützende Geduld unerträglich.

Den Holocaust zu leugnen, ist grundgesetzlich durch Meinungsfreiheit für Neonazis geschützt mit uns, aber

ein Himmler Bild mit einem Zitat zur Schulbildung in Zusammenhang mit der Bundesrepublik Deutschland zu bringen und frei in das Internet zu stellen, kann nicht unter Meinungsfreiheit fallen, da es von einem nicht mehr kontrollierbaren Personenkreis wahrgenommen werden kann.

Dann ist die Reputation von DE inne Dütten. Gegen DIESE Veröffentlichung muss mit der vollen Härte der staatlichen Gewalt vorgegangen werden:

Sonntag, 23. März 2014

Jean-Marc Vincent offeriert "passgenaue" Eingliederung in das Billiglohnland

Eltern, die ihren Kindern von vorneherein eine bessere Schulbildung sowohl in der Volksschule als auch später an einer höheren Schule vermitteln wollen, müssen dazu einen Antrag bei den Höheren SS- und Polizeiführern stellen.

Heinrich Himmler

"Einige Gedanken über die Behandlung der Fremdvölkischen im Osten" von Heinrich Himmler, 15. Mai 1940

Quelle: Kühnl, Reinhard 

"Der deutsche Faschismus in Quellen und Dokumenten."

Köln, 1978

Bildquelle: Daily Mail

Coucou Jean-Marc,

Je suis désolé de ne pas t'avoir écrit depuis si longtemps. Mein heutiger Post behandelt das folgende Satzfragment aus Ihrer Email:

Für passgenaue Beratung benötige ich Informationen über den aktuellen  Sachstand (Schulzwischenzeugnis),

Ihr Ersuchen ist interessant in gar mancher Hinsicht und ich will hier Ihren Verweis, gemacht im ersten Satz Ihrer Email, hinzufügen nach der Sie vorgeben, im Rahmen des "Beratungsauftrags nach SGB II" zu handeln.

Sie, und damit meine ich das JC allgemein, scheinen den "Beratungsauftrags nach SGB II" sehr lax, non-existent, nicht erwähnenswert oder schlicht nicht einer Antwort würdig zu erachten.

So sandte ich im November 2013 (!) eine Email an die Sachbearbeiterin Silke Strama mit Hinweisen auf Sozialgerichtsurteile zur Zahlung von anfallenden Fahrtkosten zur Schule. In üblicher verrotteter Jobcenter-Manier blieb diese Email unbeantwortet.

Am 17. Februar 2014 sandte ich eine zweite Email an besagte Silke Strama mit Fahrkartenbelegen für die Monate September - Dezember 2013 und wiederum mit Rechtshinweisen. In üblicher abgefuckter Jobcenter-Manier blieb die Email bis dato unbeantwortet.

Aber zurück zu Ihrem geheuchelten Angebot einer "passgenauen Beratung". Hmm, mon garçon du centre d'emploi, das mutet un peu seltsam an. Seltsam, insofern als niemand, aber auch gar niemand vom Jobcenter, jemals zu irgendeinem Zeitpunkt überhaupt sich in irgendeiner Form um meine Tochter gekümmert hat.

Ganz im Gegenteil. Bevor die Wunderdroge der Siebenfachen Wurfmöse Uschi von der Leyen, also das ominöse Bildungpaket in Kraft (Kraft ???) trat, konnte meine Tochter in der Schule KOSTENFREI zu Mittag essen!!!

Mit Einführung des Bildungspaketes ging das nicht mehr, denn es gab nicht genügend Räumlichkeiten, um Schüler zu verköstigen. Deutschland ist ein hochverschuldetes Land, genauer gesagt 83% des GDP; also 23% über der EU Vorgabe!!!

Egal Jean-Marc Vincent, denn Sie scheinen jene telepathischen Fähigkeiten zu besitzen, mit denen Sie, meine gutster Schlaumeier, ohne jemals auch nur einen Ton mit meiner Tochter gewechselt zu haben, ohne auch nur irgend eine Ahnung von ihren Interessen zu haben, über ihre Schwächen und Stärken zu haben, Sie möchten etwas "passgenaues" für sie finden mittels des Herumschnüffelns in einem Schulzwischenzeugnis.

Recht haben Sie, Jean-Marc, als Sie doch nun haben feststellen dürfen, dass in der freien Wirtschaft für Sie kein Platz ist und Ihr Schaffensfeld sich auf ein Jobcenter beschränken muss. Ja, so läuft der freie Arbeitsmarkt. Das ist passgenau.

Ich darf Sie meiner Hochachtung versichern, wie das Jobcenter München unter der Ägide der 30%igen Quotenmamsell Martina Musatti das Beste tut und keine Mühen scheut, Jugendliche an der Weiterbildung in hilfreicher und unterstützender Weise tatenkräftig und vorsätzlich zu behindern. Kudos, wie wir in Uganda zu sagen pflegen.

Als dies nun von mir in überzeugender und finaler Weise abgehandelt und geklärt wurde, werde ich mich im nächsten Post mit Ihrem Nachsatz

insbesondere auch darüber, ob der angestrebte Schulabschluss im Sommer erreicht wird, oder ob gegebenenfalls ein vom Jobcenter finanzierter Förderunterricht angeboten werden sollte.

beschäftigen. Ein hochinteressantes Sujet bietet sich hier wie mich dünkt, und ich will nicht umhin kommen, dies in meiner bekannt prolixen Art zu behandeln.

N'hésitez pas à nous faire savoir si nous pouvons vous fournir une aide supplémentaire.


Cordialement vôtre

____________
(1) OK, OK, das klingt nach Willkür. Wissen wir doch, aber, BANG, wir sind das BVerfG.

Neonazi-Unterstützer-Organisation Bundesverfarcungsgericht verbietet Kritik an Hartz IV

NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise!... Surprise and fear... fear and surprise... Our two weapons are fear and surprise... and ruthless efficiency! Our three weapons are fear, and surprise, and ruthless efficiency... and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope... Our four... no... Amongst our weapons... Hmf... Amongst our weaponry... are such elements as fear, surpr... I'll come in again.

. . . . . . . .

Nach intensiver Lektüre in Sachen kuriose Entscheidungen des BVG sind meine Tochter und ich zur übereinstimmenden Einschätzung gekommen, dass es sich bei dem BVG zum einen um eine Staatspropaganda-Institution handelt, um eine Neonazi-Unterstützer-Organisation als auch um ein populistisches Bananen-Republik Gericht. Viz die zwei lächerlichen Hü und Hott Kopftuch Urteile - man lese z.B. die 'Abweichende Meinung der Richter Jentsch, Di Fabio und Mellinghoff' zum Urteil des Zweiten Senats vom 24. September 2003 -- 2 BvR 1436/02 mit etlichen Klöpsen.

Ein Blick in die zivilisierte Welt

Why Is There No Headscarf Affair in the United States?
Daniel Gordon

"An employee must be permitted to wear religious garb, such as a crucifi x, a yarmulke, or a head scarf or hijab, if wearing such attire during the work day is part of the employee’s religious practice or expression, so long as the wearing of such garb does not unduly interfere with the functioning of the workplace.” — “Guidelines on Religious Exercise and Religious Expression in the Federal Workplace,”

issued by President Bill Clinton, 14 August 1997

I tell the Nashala Hearn story because it illustrates the failure of the headscarf to become an affair — a major legal controversy that divides the general public — as it has in France. The case never reached trial, and I know of no other case concerning students wearing head scarves that has gone even as far as the Hearn incident. In other rare instances where schools tried to repress the scarf, the backlash was even more immediate. For example, in January 2005, when Emily Smith, at Chattanooga East Ridge High School, was reprimanded for her scarf, a local civil rights attorney reminded the school that religious expression is protected by the Constitution. The superintendent conceded the point right away: “This particular item was a little different because it is a religious garment.”

Zurück in die Bananen Republik

Dass das BVG eine politikhörige Kammer mit Erfüllungsauftrag und ein Chor prätenziöser deutscher Elfen ist, belegte die lächerliche OMT Entscheidung Weiterleitung an den EuGH.

Besonders widerlich empfinden meine Tochter und ich das Abwimmeln durch das Bundesverfassungsgericht in seinen netten roten Soutanen.

 Die Abwimmelei war um so niederträchtiger, als dieselben Richter – von der Amazone abgesehen – das Holocaust-Leugnen eines Nazis unter den Schutz der Meinungsfreiheit stellten, aber Kritik an Hartz IV nicht zuliessen. Wir halten seitdem das Bundesverfassungsgericht für einen Erfüllungsgehilfen zur Durchsetzung und Garantierung neoliberaler Wirtschaftspolitik, als einen Kangaroo Court ungewählter von der Politik eingesetzter Richter zur Verhinderung jeglicher - noch dazu geschichtlich fundierter - Kritik an einer inhumanen auf Paralleljustiz basierenden Agenda zur staatlich garantierten  Armut, der Unterbindung von Bildung und der freien Entwicklung einer Persönlichkeit. Einer Agenda, die massgeblich für die eklatanten wirtschaftlichen Misstände und die exorbitant hohe Arbeitslosenquote in den Club Med Ländern Verantwortung trägt.


Was ging diesem Spanischen Inqisition Gericht gegen den Strich?

Dies nicht! Holocaust-Leugner Williamson
Das Grundgesetz schützt auch Neonazis

Richterin Pabst, Meine Tochter und ich verlangen die unverzügliche Rückgabe unserer beschlagnahmten IT-Ausrüstung.

Amtsgericht  München
Nymphenburgerstr.  16
80335  München

AZ:  ER  II  GS - 6711/15

Richterin  Pabst,

Meine  Tochter  und  ich  verlangen  die  unverzügliche  Rückgabe  unserer  am  28.  Okt.  2015 beschlagnahmten  IT-Ausrüstung.  Ihr  Beschluss v.  08.  Okt.  2015  verstösst  gegen Menschenrechtsprinzipien  und  ist  ein  klarer  Verstoss gegen  die  grundgesetzlich  garantierte  freie Meinungsäusserung  Artikel  5  GG.

Ihrem  Beschluss  zufolge  müssen  wir  annehmen,  Sie  sind  auch  nicht  hinlänglich  der  deutschen Sprache  mächtig.  Etwas 'veröffentlichen'  setzt  voraus,  dass es nicht  schon  veröffentlicht  ist.  Alle  Bilder sind  auf  den  Websites deutscher  Medien  zu  finden  und  bislang  unbeanstandet.

Durch  die  Beschlagnahme  des Computers meiner  Tochter  hat  die  Münchner  Justiz  zum  dritten  Mal deren  schulischen  Erfolg  willentlich  und  unter  Brechung  demokratischer  Grundrechte  auf  das Äusserste  gefährdet.  Im  Sept.  2015  mussten  wir  eine  Verfassungsbeschwerde  wegen  des  skandalösen rassistischen  Urteils der  Münchner  Justiz  einreichen.  Dies  ist  abermals ein  Beleg  für  den  bekannten institutionellen  Rassismus  in  deutschen  Behörden  und  insbesondere  der  Justiz  und  Polizei  in  Bayern.

In  Kollaboration  mit  der  rassistischen  Behörde  Jobcenter  München  hat  die  Münchner  Justiz  schon mehrfach  mich  und  meine  Tochter  bewusst  in  unseren  Rechten  massivst  eingeschränkt  und  bestraft mit  dem  Ziel,  uns mundtot  zu  machen,  uns finanziell  zu  vernichten  und  meine  Tochter  ihrer  Zukunft zu  berauben. Die  kriminelle  Rassistenbehörde  Jobcenter  unternimmt  alles erdenkliche,  um  meine Tochter  von  der  Schule  zu  bekommen  und  in  einen  Billiglohn-Job.

Weiters versucht  die  Münchner  Justiz  in  Kollaboration  mit  dem  Jobcenter  München  alles,  um  den Blog  'meinjobcenter.blogspot.com'  zum  verschwinden  zu  bringen.  Sie  will  die  Kritik  an  einer sozialverbrecherischen  Einrichtung,  die  gegen  demokratische  Grundrechte  verstösst  und  durch  ihre Praktiken,  basierend  auf  neoliberaler  Wirtschaftspolitik,  die  Hegemonie  Deutschlands übereuropäische  Staaten  durchsetzen  will  und  dies sehr  erfolgreich  tut,  gelöscht  sehen.  Die  bayerische Justiz  operiert  so als  Handlanger  zur  weiteren  Unterdrückung  und  Knechtung  südeuropäischer  EUStaaten  und  der  skandalösen  hohen  Arbeitslosigkeit  insbesondere  unter  den  jungen  Menschen  des europäischen  Club-Med.

Die  Münchner  Justiz  hat  auch  nicht  davor  zurückgeschreckt,  meine  Tochter  einer Körperdurchsuchung  unterziehen  zu  wollen.  Es kamen  zum  Termin  der  Beschlagnahme  zwei männliche  Polizisten  und  eine  weibliche!  Es kam  nicht  zur  Körperdurchsuchung,  weil  sie  schon  auf dem Weg  zur  Schule  war.  Sie  wollten  sie  auch  völlig  jeglicher  sozialer  Kommunikationsmöglichkeiten berauben  durch  Beschlagnahme  ihres  Handys,  denn  mein  Handy  wurde  beschlagnahmt.

Bei  Betreten  unserer  Wohnung  am  28.  Oktober  2015  stürzte  einer  der  männlichen  Polizisten, BEWAFFNET  mit  Pistole  und  Pfefferspray  (!)  sofort  in  das Zimmer  meiner  Tochter,  ohne  auch  nur anzuklopfen.  Wir  sind  ob  solcher  aus der  Nazi-Zeit  bekannten  Szenarien  zutiefst  entsetzt. Meine Tochter  ist  äusserst  verängstigt  und  nur  noch  von  einem  Gedanken  beseelt:  dieses Rassistenland Deutschland  mit  einer  korrupten  Justiz  so schnell  wie  möglich  zu  verlassen.

Sie  sind  in  Ihrem  Beschluss noch  nicht  einmal  in  der  Lage  einen  konkreten  Zeitpunkt  der  Abbildungen mit  NS-Symbolen  auf  dem  Blog  zu  nennen:  "Zu  einem  noch  nicht  genau  bestimmbaren  Zeitpunkt  am 08.05.2015  oder  kurz  zuvor  veröffentlichte  der  Beschuldigte  ...". Abbildungen  im  übrigen,  die  von öffentlich-rechtlichen  Anstalten  sowie  der  deutschen  Presse  stammen!

Das Bild  auf  Twitter  stammt  von  der  deutschen  Website  'allmystery.de'  mit  folgendem  Administrator:

Administrative  contact

The  administrative  contact  (admin-c)  is  the  natural person appointed  by  the  domain holder  to  act as  his/her  authorized representative  and who  also  has  the  duty towards  DENIC  of  taking  binding decisions  in all matters  concerning  the  domain  allmystery.de.

Name: Daniel  Dingeldey

Address: Gautinger Str.  10

Postal Code: 82319

City: Starnberg

Country: DE

Die  Abbildungen  rechtfertigen  auch  niemals eine  Beschlagnahme,  da  sie  öffentlich  auf  deutschen Medien  und  unbeanstandet  sind.

Ich  habe  mittlerweile  Kontakt  mit  US  Anwälten  aufgenommen  bezüglich  eines Antrags auf  Asyl  für meine  Tochter  in  den  USA.  Meine  Tochter  fühlt  sich  in  Deutschland  nicht  mehr  sicher.  Sie  will  dieses Land  unbedingt  verlassen,  insbesondere  hinsichtlich  der  berüchtigten  bayerischen  Justiz  mit  Neonazi Affinität.  Ich  bin  nicht  in  der  Lage  bei  einer  solchen  Justiz,  die  die  kriminelle  und  rassistische  deutsche Behörde  Jobcenter  München  offenkundig  in  ihren  unablässigen  Akten  zur  willentlichen  Schädigung von  uns unterstützt,  meiner  asiatisch-deutschen  Tochter  Schutz  zu  bieten.

Meine  Tochter  und  ich  haben  lange  Zeit  in  Asien  gelebt.  Wir  haben  eine  solche  Korruptheit,  solche Hinterhältigkeit,  eine  solche  perfide  Verlogenheit  von  bayerischen  Richtern  (Richterin  Bassler  fällt  uns ein  und  auf  meinem  Blog  in  zwei  Posts beschrieben)  und  eine  derart  herunter  gekommene  bayerische Justiz,  die  einen  Neonazi  als Richter  beschäftigt,  noch  nicht  erlebt.  Wir  hätten  so etwas nicht  für möglich  gehalten  in  einem  demokratischen  Staat  und  sind  zutiefst  angewidert.

Ich & meine Tochter

Englische Version für Justizbehörden in den USA