CHILDREN AND GENDER INEQUALITY: EVIDENCE FROM DENMARK (Pdf)
ABSTRACT
Despite considerable gender convergence over time, substantial gender inequality persists in all countries. Using Danish administrative data from 1980-2013 and an event study approach, we show that most of the remaining gender inequality in earnings is due to children. The arrival of children creates a gender gap in earnings of around 20% in the long run, driven in roughly equal proportions by labor force participation, hours of work, and wage rates. Underlying these “child penalties”, we find clear dynamic impacts on occupation, promotion to manager, sector, and the family friendliness of the firm for women relative to men. Based on a dynamic decomposition framework, we show that the fraction of gender inequality caused by child penalties has increased dramatically over time, from about 40% in 1980 to about 80%in 2013. As a possible explanation for the persistence of child penalties, we show that they are transmitted through generations, from parents to daughters (but not sons), consistent with an influence of childhood environment in the formation of women’s preferences over family and career.I have a problem right away with the abstract when it says "child penalties". In sports you get a penalty for acting or engaging outside of the rules of the game. Life has no such rules. You are expected to stay inside the law, apart from that you are pretty free. You may take a dump on the desk of your boss any day. Chances are, it won't be many of those days. You may talk rude to other people, there is no penalty doing so. You will perhaps dine in lonely places more often.
Seriously, a woman makes a conscious (hopefully) choice when bearing a child. So there is no penalty. These are life choices made out of free will. You are playing the game.
Under Conclusions it says among others:
Third, we have provided evidence in favor of environmental inuences in the formation of preferences over family vs career. In particular, we have shown that the female child penalty is strongly related to the work history of the maternal grandparents: women who grow up in traditional families with a male breadwinner and a female homemaker incur larger child penalties when they themselves become mothers.Not quit sure, but it sounds a little contrived to me. I still get the most out of Bourdieu and certainly so in terms of an entertaining lingo so typical of the French intelligencia.
It is no doubt in the encounter with the 'objective' expectations' inscribed, mostly in the implicit state, in the positions offered to women by the still very strongly sexually differentiated division of labour that the so-called 'feminine' dispositions inculcated by the family and the whole social order are able to be fulfilled or even blossom, and, in this very process, to be rewarded, thereby helping to reinforce the fundamental sexual dichotomy, both in the jobs, which seem to call for submissiveness and the need for security, and in their occupants, who are identified with positions in which, enchanted or alienated, they both find themselves and lose themselves. The essentially social logic of what is called 'vocation' has the effect of producing these kinds of harmonious encounters between dispositions and positions in which the victims of symbolic domination can felicitously (in both senses) perform the subaltern or subordinate tasks that are assigned to their virtues of submission, gentleness, docility, devotion and self-denial.
(Masculine Domination)via Bradford DeLong
However little known the feelings or views of such a man may be on his first entering a neighbourhood, this truth is so well fixed in the minds of the surrounding families, that he is considered the rightful property of some one or other of their daughters.
Pride and Prejudice
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen
Hinweis: Nur ein Mitglied dieses Blogs kann Kommentare posten.