5/31/2017

German Justice Minister Maas, Labor Minister Nahles, where is the difference that makes one Merkel-Nazi caricature a criminal offense?

Case 1 (of 3 - all brought on by German labor agencies infringing my right to free speech)

cc Labor Minister Nahles,


Dear Justice Minister Maas,

Politeness obliges me to first congratulate you on having joined the illustrious circle of literati as a purveyor of very fine prose. The reviews on Amazon so far are promising. The unfortunate departure of Karl-Theodor Maria Nikolaus Johann Jacob Philipp Franz Joseph Sylvester Buhl-Freiherr von und zu Guttenberg had had created a poignant intellectual vacuum. It has been more than replenished now. I feel inclined to say with Victor Hugo: "You invest the heaven of art with we know not what deadly rays; you create a new shudder".

From what I gather, you also seem to be the eminent authority on all things #hatespeech and you see it as your "responsibility to eradicate criminal content" on the internet. (1) (2)

Fair enough. The good news is, you are not alone in this endeavor as one overweight bloke and chief of your country's Labor Agency in Ingolstadt, Mr Manfred Jager,
Manfred Jager
& the "German Aryan Internet"
saw himself as the guardian of decent, clean and uncontroversial internet content - may I call it "German Aryan Internet"? - and filed a criminal complaint against me, a blogger, for reposting this then well-known Merkel-Nazi caricature. (Pic below)





Again​, it is obviously a caricature. This may have been lost on the German psyche as humor is not exactly the strong suit of your countrymen. Oops, forgot the women, politically incorrect that I am.

The occasion in 2012 was your country's attack on the free people of Greece with Weapons of Financial Mass Destruction (lasting to this very day and on) courtesy three "institutions". Other German news sites reported with a similar caricature. (see examples below)






However, it is to be assumed, Mr Jager either lacked the balls to file a complaint against them or wanted to silence a despicable blogger who dares to put in pixeltime against the inhuman Hartz 4 concept. Stupid and lacking any sort of refinement, Mr Jager backed it up with a ridiculous financial threat - some may call it blackmailing - by asking for € 10,000, thereby giving proof that he does not even know the basics of game theory.

Subsequently, my computer was confiscated for 25 months and I was convicted in a court case that was rigged from the very start by the judge and my colluding court appointed lawyer and crook Aglaia Muth from Munich. One of your lieutenants, Dr. Franz, preferred to display his cold shoulder towards me. Fritzling things away and keeping quiet worked quite well in Nazi times and the Germans stick to it, or so it seems. (3)

Anyhoo, Justice Minister & Labor Minister of Germany, could you kindly explain to me (and perhaps some readers of this post) why does my posted Merkel-Nazi caricature contravene § 86 a STGB and the others do not?

Perhaps critical bloggers are considered by your Bavarian kangaroo courts as
  • Pariahs and second-rate people in Germany, or
  • potentially mentally retarded as Munich Judge Grain phrased it in a letter, or
  • forfeit automatically their right to free speech once they feel the generous comforts of Hartz 4, or
  • just prove the Turkish president Erdogan and his Foreign Minister's assessment correct, that Germany is "a totally repressive system" and "all practices resemble those of the Nazi era." After all, he is a contract partner of your government and should know.
I am looking forward hearing from you and would like to add that in light of so far three separate  instances of infringement of my right to free speech, all perpetrated by staff of German labor agencies, I will have to call on you again shortly. This time with regard to a decision by the 'Bundesgerichtshof 1StR622/16 of March 21, 2017' pertaining to a law that seemed to interest judge Grain and my court appointed lawyer Aglaia Muth absolute fuck. You do have strange courts.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

________
(1) a domain btw where Germany is an absolute ZERO.
(2) your legal framework is not exactly well received in knowledgeable circles like media law expert Prof. Dr. Marc Liesching who calls it fittingly the "Free-speech-fighting law" that will be overturned by the Constitutional Court.
(3) I should be in a position to judge as I have a German birth certificate. However, that is all there is to my "German-ness" and I feel no need for a pretentious German 'Leitkultur'. It's other peoples and their way of life and culture that interest me. Besides, I have no problem with a fucking burka. I do have a problem though with your unrelenting and constant Nazi "documentaries" on your boring German TV, financed by a mandatory Goebbels-Propaganda-Fee. All under the guise of education. Oh, and I have a problem with fucking Christian missionaries in South Asia. Saw those assholes under various guises almost daily. No Hindu, Buddhist or Muslim ever tried to convert or coax me. They have style and personality.

Keine Kommentare:

Kommentar veröffentlichen

Hinweis: Nur ein Mitglied dieses Blogs kann Kommentare posten.