German Home Minister de Maizière, by staying silent you are condoning Nazi methods against a blogger.

cc
AG Munich (Court)
Police Munich
____________________

Shah Jahan

If there is a place anywhere on the earth

without free speech,

 it is here, it is here, and it is here.

with apologies to Shah Jahan

Thomas de Maizière, Home Minister and chief anti-Muslim hate monger of racist Germany,

It is with tremendous personal discomfort that I had to paraphrase one of the greatest and learned persons of a religion and peoples upon which our present-day living and science is based and that so much enriched and keeps enriching our lives, regardless of one being a religious human being or agnostic. A religion, that is so disparaged by people and the media of your country and which is not mine.


Having said that, you are aware of the following incident yet you chose to stay mum. That in itself is quite telling!

Here the lowdown again in concise form:

On May 7, 2015 a criminal complaint was sent by email to the Bavarian Police from the IP address 217.253.91.237 under a false name according to the police report!

This was followed in October 2015 with three police ARMED with FIREGUNS (two men, one woman) coming to our apartment around 7:40 AM and confiscating ALL our IT equipment including router, USB sticks, ext. HD, cables and including my smartphone. One police man dashed into the room of my daughter without knocking. My daughter had already left for school. They took photos of our apartment and of the house. These are Nazi methods!

I was frisked and it was obvious that the female officer had been tasked to bodysearch my daughter and that they would have confiscated her smartphone as well.

We are 99% sure based on convincing circumstancial evidence, that the sender is either from the Jobcenter, the Federal Employment Agency Munich or a goon.

An IP address lookup established as location "80999 Munich". Due South of this location in about 2 km distance as the crow flies the Jobcenter Pasing is located and about 3 km NE is the home of a staff member of the Jobcenter head office. (Geo location is not 100% precise)

The police, which to an extent falls in your portfolio, did nothing to establish the true person behind the false name! They were rather occupied to do everything to shut down a blogger, who incidentally happens to be me.

May I direct your valued attention, should it not be preoccupied by yet another populist rant against refugees and/or Muslim, to the following passages of a fairly recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the CASE OF SCHATSCHASCHWILI v. GERMANY (Application no. 9154/10). BTW, yet another case of a violation of fair trial in Germany! You are aware of that certain Oscar Wilde quote, aren't you?

120.   In  cases  concerning  a  witness’s  absence  owing  to  unreachability, the  Court  requires  the  trial  court  to  have  made  all  reasonable  efforts  to secure  the  witness’s  attendance  (see  Gabrielyan  v.  Armenia,  no.  8088/05, §  78,  10  April  2012;  Tseber  v.  the  Czech  Republic,  no.  46203/08,  §  48, 22  November  2012;  and  Kostecki  v.  Poland,  no.  14932/09,  §§  65  and  66, 4  June  2013).  The  fact  that  the  domestic  courts  were  unable  to  locate  the witness  concerned  or  the  fact  that  a  witness  was  absent  from  the  country  in which  the  proceedings  were  conducted  was  found  not  to  be  sufficient  in itself  to  satisfy  the  requirements  of  Article  6  §  3  (d),  which  require  the Contracting  States  to  take  positive  steps  to  enable  the  accused  to  examine  or have  examined  witnesses  against  him  (see  Gabrielyan,  cited  above,  §  81; Tseber,  cited  above,  §  48;  and  Lučić  v.  Croatia,  no.  5699/11,  §  79, 27  February  2014).  Such  measures  form  part  of  the  diligence  which  the Contracting  States  have  to  exercise  in  order  to  ensure  that  the  rights guaranteed  by  Article  6  are  enjoyed  in  an  effective  manner  (see  Gabrielyan, cited  above,  §  81,  with  further  references).  Otherwise,  the  witness’s  absence is  imputable  to  the  domestic  authorities  (see  Tseber,  cited  above,  §  48,  and Lučić,  cited  above, § 79). 

I would deem the following paragraph of particular interest:

121.   It  is  not  for  the  Court  to  compile  a  list  of  specific  measures  which the  domestic  courts  must  have  taken  in  order  to  have  made  all  reasonable efforts  to secure  the  attendance  of  a  witness  whom  they  finally  considered to be  unreachable  (see  Tseber,  cited  above,  §  49).  However,  it  is  clear that  they must  have  actively  searched  for  the  witness  with  the  help  of  the  domestic authorities  including  the  police  (see  Salikhov,  cited  above,  §§  116-17; Prăjină  v.  Romania,  no.  5592/05,  §  47,  7  January  2014;  and  Lučić,  cited above,  §  79)  and  must,  as  a  rule,  have  resorted  to  international  legal assistance  where  a  witness  resided  abroad  and  such  mechanisms  were available  (see  Gabrielyan,  cited  above,  §  83;  Fąfrowicz,  cited  above,  §  56; Lučić,  cited  above, § 80;  and  Nikolitsas,  cited  above, § 35). 

I demand to know the name and address of the person hiding behind the false name! You have the means to get the name. Get it done!

I would expect an answer of substance within one week. Should this not materialize, I will file a complaint for failure to commit to his responsibility of due diligence against police officer Carstens from Munich. The complaint will be in English and also submitted to the European Court of Human Rights as part of my submitted Complaint No. 35285/16.

Days ago I could not help but hearing chancellor Merkel talk about values to be met by President-elect Trump as a requirement for talks. You guys seem to be starting the Silly Season early.

Nobody infringes my right to free speech !

Thank you,