Obnoxious critical bloggers have to be silenced and Munich judge Bassler sees to it - Part 2

Munich judge Bassler totally blows her cover of being a democrat when she speaks of "permissible forms of communication" in the court's verdict.

This time I brought along my daughter. The reason being that she gets a taste of how screwed and corrupt a court can be in Germany, and especially in racist Bavaria. She was not being disappointed by this creepy court.

When I introduced her to the court after some time into the court hearing, judge Bassler visibly jerked a little. That was not exactly according to her plan.

Himmler quote on education

Parents who want to provide their children a better education from the outset both in elementary school and later at a high school, have to submit an application with the Higher SS and Police Leaders. - Himmler


It is interesting to see how the Kangaroo Court Munich is in cahoots with the criminal German government agency Jobcenter, because it is low-wage workers that Germany craves and anything needs to be done to crush dissent or critique of said seedy agency.

1. Judge Bassler plays stupid: the Himmler quote needs an explanation. As if it is not self-explanatory.

On page 4 judge Bassler laments that by posting the Himmler image cum quote I fail to discuss neither the quote nor Himmler himself. 

Well, dear judge, the purpose of a quote is to "provide important pieces of evidence and lend fresh voices and perspectives to your narrative". It is then important to provide the reader with the context for the quotation. A quote is a concise distillation of a thought or opinion. Should you prefer a German explanation of the purpose of using a quote in writing, you might want to consult this person.

However, what really irks judge Bassler is that someone dares to criticize the German government agency charged with the job to pressure people into low-wage jobs, which are the cornerstone for the unsustainable dependency on ever higher export surplusses. It is a fact and has been reported in several papers of various international and national commissions that lower class youth are considerably less represented in higher education in Germany.

2. Next judge Bassler deplores the missing context between the Himmler quote, his education policy and any parallels to the policy of the Jobcenter. 

Judge Bassler, you are missing the forest for the trees when I mentioned in my post:

• the refusal of the Jobcenter to pay school transportation
• nobody has ever seen or had any contact with my daughter
• the government education package was of no benefit, instead we incurred higher costs
• the demand to see the term sheet has no legal basis
• the insinuation my daughter would need private tutoring without knowing anything about her
• proffering "help" to sign up to the German Labor Agency's jobs website.

That is quite some context, judge Bassler, and in a civilized country this is called discrimination and this conduct was also featured in the German media.

3. Judge Bassler condemns that I do not distance myself from national-socialism in that Himmler image.

Judge Basler, show me any German newspaper that distances itself from national-socialism when they feature their never-ending stories about that time with Nazi images galore and show three times a week latently glorifying TV documentaries that even my 93-year old mother is sick to the stomach of it. Face it, judge Bassler, Germans love that shit and perhaps you can help THE SPIEGEL when it asks "How hitler is THE SPIEGEL?"

4. On page 8 of the court's verdict judge Bassler turns totally ridiculous and and unmasks herself in a mind-boggling way: 

"§ 86a STGB serves the formal exclusion of certain symbols out of the permissible (sic!!!) forms of communication (tabooing), in order to prevent an effect of habituation".

This statement is so utterly deluded, reeks of a total contempt of anything factual and judge Bassler totally blows her cover of being a democrat, when she speaks of "permissible forms of communication".

Judge Bassler would not be true to her style, had she not twisted and sabotaged arguments from me. So my daughter was witness of the following tricks this judge resorted to in order to not give the two jurors (two absolutely dead bodies sitting on a chair) any doubts as to how they were supposed to decide:

5. I wanted to show nine pages of Nazi images from Germany media and was cut short by judge Bassler after the first page. My daughter was witness.

6. I referred to this picture

on the cover of The Spiegel on March 21, 2015 as yet another example of how freely the German media shows pictures with the Nazi swastika.

Judge Bassler had the audacity to claim the article in The Spiegel was explaining historic events of that time. It is a blatant lie as the article is a primitive piece of shoddy journalism that deals about the Nazi occupation of that time with one single sentence that says 'Manolis Glezos tricked Adolf Hitler' and this at a time when the German media ran the most primitive anti-Greece campaign against the Tsipras government. 

The Spiegel piece reads the following: The Greek demands for Nazi-time reparations are an act of despair; high jobless rate being the fault of the Greeks; the powerless Greeks are making noise to get an audience. The rest of the article is neo-liberal nonsense claiming Germany never intended to dominate economically in Europe, it was just a coincidence. The ludicrous article ends by claiming the "Germans are the most respected peoples in the world". 

Of course, judge Bassler has never ever read that article. As a judge in a corrupt system you have to get the jurymen on your side, no matter what lie is necessary. My daughter was witness.

7. The verdict also does not mention the second appearance of policeman Weritz who was again asked if the blog post was still online.

Judge Bassler wants critical blog posts deleted and a blogger to shut up for good. My daughter was witness.

8. A real cunning judge easily plays the jurymen

Judges like Bassler influence jurymen by calling as witness without any necessity a cop, who had confiscated our computer the first time in 2013. She then asks him what I responded to his call for interrogation without informing the jurymen that his written invitation did not firstly, inform me about my right to stay silent (like in civilized countries such as the USA with its Miranda rights) and secondly and most importantly, informing me about §163a STPO which says that a call to a police hearing entails no responsibility to appear. This is how a cunning judge plays jurymen and of course they fall for it as they are siting there like dead ducks.

However, a really cunning Bavarian judge does not stop here. Judge Bassler then continues to ask him in front of the jurymen if that blog post is still online and thus giving them the impression the post contravenes the law and that they are dealing here with a real criminal. This is not lost on the jurymen and this is how Bavarian courts rig and manipulate verdicts.
Jurymen are in the pocket of a judge anyway.

My lawyer Aiko Petersen was sitting the like a comatose bloke.

9. Judge Bassler explicitly left out the blog list of blogs I follow. Those are mainly international blogs dealing about economic issues. My daughter was witness.

This is (?) was the environment in Bavaria of judge Bassler: a Neonazi judge.

Neonazi judge in Bavaria (BILD image)