Federal Labor Minister, please explain your Blocking policy on Social Network Twitter

F A X

Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs (BMAS)
Wilhelmstraße 49
10117 Berlin

Telefax: 03018 527-1830

Jan. 14, 2019

Subject: Blocking policy on Social Network Twitter

Federal Labor Minister Heil,

• In January 2015 I started informing the German Federal Labor Ministry via emails and PDFs about criminal endeavours of public servants from the Labor Agency Munich and the Jobcenter Munich against me and my Tibetan daughter. 
• We are looking at black mailing (€ 10,000!) by the civil servant criminal Manfred Jäger (Labor Ag. Ingolstadt) in tow with hanger-on Martina Musati (Labor Ag. Stuttgart) in August 2012.
• We are looking at a secret phone call by the civil servants C. Bechheim and C. Bockes (Labor Ag. Munich). Covered up for over five years under breach of Art. 6 ECHR by the Munich police, Munich court and Munich “lawyer” and fraudster cum double-crosser Aglaia Muth.
• This government censorship trio was irked by blog posts, like a negative post about the company Zalando, situation at schools and kindergarten, etc.
• And we are looking at the criminal (libel) civil servant & Useful Idiot Jürgen Sonneck who sent a criminal complaint against me via email to the Munich police in May 2015 using the false name “C. Paucher”. Subsequently in Oct. 2015 our complete IT equipment was confiscated! When I managed to blow his cover in July 2017, this creep was quickly shifted to another agency within Munich.
• Some time around 2017 or first half 2018 I (@ErebusSagace) was blocked @BMAS_Bund on Twitter.
• Two enquiring emails to the ‘Social Media Editor of the Public Relations Unit of the Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media’ Dr. Katharina Henschen on Aug. 25 and Sept. 01, 2018 as to why I was blocked were left unanswered!

I demand to know why I was blocked on Twitter. I would appreciate a written answer stating the reason(s) and the official ministry’s policy on blocking on social networks by February 08, 2019. Preferably in Pdf form, s'il vous plaît.

• I trust you are aware that freedom of information comprises of two components: the principle of democracy according to Article 20 (1) Basic Law and the right to privacy according to Article 2 (1) in conjunction with Article 1 (1) Basic Law, because information is a vital element on the path to development of a personality.
• May I also draw your attention to “The Leipziger-Volkszeitung” decision of the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) of October 3, 1969, in which the Federal Constitutional Court deals with the importance of the Freedom of Information (Rezipientenfreiheit) as an independent fundamental right.
• The Court’s decision has some peculiarity in that “this fundamental right was introduced only after 1945 on the basis of the experiences with the state steering of the information and Gleichschaltung in the Nazi state in Germany” (Wikipedia, see above).
• Furthermore, a glance across the pond could serve as an example of free speech and information: “Blocking of Twitter Users from @RealDonaldTrump Violates First Amendment”. I encourage you in particular to read paragraph 1 and 3 and perhaps gain some inspiration.

Thank you,

Civil servants Censorship Trio Bockes/Bechheim/Jäger

Criminal civil servant Jürgen Sonneck alias 'C. Paucher'
Covered by Munich police and Munich court

Fly-by-night lawyer, fraudster cum double-crosser Aglaia Muth, Munich
Fucks you over for money