Federal Minister of Family Affairs, please explain your Blocking policy on Social Network Twitter

F A X

Federal Ministry of Family Affairs
Glinkastraße 24
10117 Berlin

Telefax: 03018/ 555 - 1145

Jan. 13, 2019

Subject: Blocking policy on Social Network Twitter

Federal Minister of Family Affairs Giffey,

• On Jun 25, 2018, I had emailed you a Pdf in German language with the subject line “New Employee & Immigrant Integration Icon C. Paucher, who does not exist, fulfills an educational mandate at the Department of Education and Sport Munich brilliantly”.
• Days or few weeks later I (@ErebusSagace) was blocked @BMFSFJ on Twitter.
• In the Pdf I informed you about the criminal (libel) civil servant Jürgen Sonneck who had dispatched a criminal complaint against me, a blogger, via email to the Munich police in May 2015 using the false name “C. Paucher”. Subsequently in Oct. 2015 our complete IT equipment was confiscated! Everything was covered up by Munich police and the rotten Munich court. When I managed to blow his cover in July 2017 this devious character was quickly shifted to another agency within Munich.
• Two emails to the ‘Social Media Editor of the Public Relations Unit of the Federal Government Commissioner for Culture and the Media’ Dr. Katharina Henschen on Aug. 25 and Sept. 01, 2018 were left unanswered!
• An Email from the government spokesman Mr Seibert from Sept. 06, 2018 to your ministry on my behalf elicited no response.

I demand to know why I was blocked on Twitter. I would appreciate a written answer stating the reason(s) and the official ministry’s policy on blocking on social networks by February 06, 2019. Preferably in Pdf form, s'il vous plaît.

• I trust you are aware that freedom of information comprises of two components: the principle of democracy according to Article 20 (1) Basic Law and the right to privacy according to Article 2 (1) in conjunction with Article 1 (1) Basic Law, because information is a vital element on the path to development of a personality.
• May I also draw your attention to “The Leipziger-Volkszeitung” decision of the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) of October 3, 1969, in which the Federal Constitutional Court deals with the importance of the Freedom of Information (Rezipientenfreiheit) as an independent fundamental right.
• It may be of particular interest to you that “this fundamental right was introduced only after 1945 on the basis of the experiences with the state steering of the information and Gleichschaltung in the Nazi state in Germany” (Wikipedia, see above).
• Furthermore, a glance across the pond could serve as an example of free speech and information: “Blocking of Twitter Users from @RealDonaldTrump Violates First Amendment”. I encourage you in particular to read paragraph 1 and 3.

Thank you,

(signed)