Tweets mit Sprecher der Bundesregierung über diesen von Polizei/Münchner Justiz gedeckten Behörden-Typen Jürgen Sonneck in den Abwasserkanälen der Anonymität hausierend

Come to think of it, a public employee (Beamter) from the Jobcenter Munich gets the fucking stupid idea to send an online criminal complaint @PolizeiMuenchen using a FALSE NAME. Here is the demented person, former co-CEO Jürgen Sonneck. Now @StadtMuenchen pic.twitter.com/5WCWwGM6cr

— Straussian Obfuscator (@ErebusSagace) November 30, 2018

The Jobcenter Munich's Useful Idiot Jürgen Sonneck was so sure the Munich Court/Police would cover his ass until he ran smack into the law of diminishing marginal utility.

— Straussian Obfuscator (@ErebusSagace) November 30, 2018

The computer of my Tibetan daughter who went to school at that time and needed it was DELIBERATELY DAMAGED by the rotten Munich Court. A bunch of lying judges and cunning, sophomoric prosecutors.

— Straussian Obfuscator (@ErebusSagace) November 30, 2018

It does not stop here. Two emails to Dr. Katharina Henschen, Head of your Public Relations in Berlin, stayed unanswered. Keeping things clandestine, a tried and tested historical brown tradition.

— Straussian Obfuscator (@ErebusSagace) November 30, 2018

This from @Spiegel Bento does not contravene Criminal Code 86a. pic.twitter.com/SolZF5EtGg

— Straussian Obfuscator (@ErebusSagace) November 30, 2018

This Merkel-Nazi pic is legal. You got to love the Joker Boyz in Karlsruhe. Was it Wehner or Ehmke who called them "the assholes in Karlsruhe"? pic.twitter.com/ZJ5aCIlA9u

— Straussian Obfuscator (@ErebusSagace) November 30, 2018

Is there more? You betcha, these criminal freaks from the Labor Agency Munich. Covered and protected as well by ... Well, you guessed it by now. Freaks demanded blog posts to be deleted, or pay € 10,000. (Bockes/Bechheim/Jäger) pic.twitter.com/mv7iETyH7r

— Straussian Obfuscator (@ErebusSagace) November 30, 2018

With your permission I have tagged this 'GermanMinistriesSocialNetworkBlockerNazis' as the @BMAS_Bund blocked me as well in 2017 as did socialist justice minister Kathy Barley recently. After all, ze Germans have a zing wiz monster compound words, I've been told. pic.twitter.com/ArT9Z7sXZA

— Straussian Obfuscator (@ErebusSagace) November 30, 2018

You Germans need a serious lesson in Free Speech. pic.twitter.com/VNbIRZM1Fb

— Straussian Obfuscator (@ErebusSagace) November 30, 2018

Nachhilfeunterricht Nr. 4 für AG, LG und OLG München: Das Semiotische Dreieck für diese Provinz-Juristen

"Es ist bei dem Bild auch nicht erkennbar, dass sich der Angeklagte eindeutig gegen den Nationalsozialismus ausspricht."

LG München Richterin Baßler zu diesem Meme unten

. . . . . . . .

Wir wenden uns aus den intellektuellen Niederungen der Nymphenburger Strasse in der Provinz zur Einstimmung zu ein wenig Anspruchsvollerem, um dann etwas näher auf besagtes Meme einzugehen:

THE AFFECT AND EFFECT OF INTERNET MEMES: ASSESSING PERCEPTIONS AND INFLUENCE OF ONLINE USER-GENERATED POLITICAL DISCOURSE AS MEDIA
Submitted by Heidi E. Huntington - Department of Journalism and Media Communication

"Memes may be understood as representational discourse by considering them through the lens of visual rhetoric, which analyze visual artifacts as persuasive messages. Visual rhetoric expands on traditional rhetorical theory of spoken discourse (Foss, 2004) and understands such rhetorical artifacts to be created by individuals to construct meaning (Foss, 2004). Traditionally, rhetoric is “considered to be public, contextual, and contingent” (Kenney, 2002, p. 54), and these characteristics are present in memes. Memes’ visual nature lends itself to several specific rhetorical practices. These include such techniques as: The use of iconic images and intertextual references to multiple texts to create visual enthymemes, in which viewers are drawn into the construction of the argument by cognitively making a connection to fill in the image’s unstated premise (Blair, 2004); the use of tropes such as metaphor or typed personas (Lewis, 2012) across memes also fill an argumentative need; and dialogism through the rhetoric of irritation caused by the juxtaposition of incongruous images the brain must pause to understand (Stroupe, 2004).

Visual communication, including rhetoric and discourse, has been influential to politics and the study of political communication for some time, especially from rhetorical and persuasive perspectives. Abraham (2009) examined editorial cartoons and argued that their visual qualities offer deep reflection on and can orient viewers to social issues. Abraham noted that editorial cartoons’ humor, far from being simple, derives from their ability to deconstruct complex ideas using symbolic images (p. 121). Neuberger and Krcmar (2008) argued that editorial cartoons are politically and ideologically charged, and experimentally demonstrated attitude change in participants who viewed such cartoons. Kjeldsen (2000) described how visual metaphor in a political advertisement could make a host of arguments about a candidate’s fitness for office.

Meme forbidden in Germany.

Contravenes Criminal Code 86a

Hier noch einmal die Sequenzen von Daniel Ginsberg aus dem vorigen Post.

Object - Sign - Interpretant

Das 'Object' in dem Meme ist Heimarbeit (Work from Home)

Das 'Sign' ist Nein (das ambivalente 'Nine' als Verballhornung als auch als Alludierung auf den nine-to-five job)

Der 'Interpretant' ist Marissa Mayer als Hitler (siehe Tineye), natürlich mit Swastika (das tausendfach bekannte Hitler Meme), denn es gilt eine Message zu unterstreichen.

Wie Daniel Ginsberg es ausführt: "The way it works is that the interpretant-object relation mirrors the sign-object relation."

"Es funktioniert so, dass die Interpretant-Objekt-Beziehung die Zeichen-Objekt-Beziehung widerspiegelt."

Daniel Ginsberg weiter: "The versatility of these memes arises because, combined with object labeling, they can capture an entire semiotic relation in one image."

Und nun kommts: "As long as "It's semiotics" doesn't become the new "Time for some game theory," it's all good." MAW, solange nicht wieder Nonsense kommt.

Alles klar auf den billigen intellektuellen Rängen im Kangaroo Court München? Die lächerliche Münchner Polizei bleibt da ganz draussen. Hoffnungsloser intellektueller Horizont. Mir fiel bei denen immer der Begriff 'Intellektuelle Legasthenie' ein und siehe da, nachdem ich durch Zufall gegoogelt habe, ob es da was gibt ... und da ist es.

. . . . . . . . .

Richard Dawkins on the internet's hijacking of the word 'meme

"As for me, I’d rather spread memes than genes anyway."

Um den Zirkel zu schliessen, bietet sich an, so zu schliessen wie begonnen, mit durchtriebener Dummheit aus dem Kangaroo Court München:

"Die festgestellte Verwendung und Gestaltung der verfahrensgegenständlichen Bilder unter Verwendung von Symbolen der NS-Gewaltherrschaft lässt vielmehr vielgestaltige Interpretationen zu, auch eine Interpretation, die gerade nicht als Distanzierung anzusehen ist."

OStA Weiß - OLG München

In diesem Sinne, Gute Nacht.

Ob diese Geistesbolzen überhaupt so etwas wie ein Verkehrsschild verstanden haben???

German Justice Min. Barley, your Criminal Code 86a (swastikas), the (missing) disclaimer and the Munich Kangaroo Court's double standard application with a blogger

Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz
Mohrenstraße 37
10117 Berlin

June 16, 2018

cc AG, LG, OLG, StA Munich, BMAS & fly-by-night lawyer Aglaia Muth

Subject: Criminal Code 86a (swastikas), the (missing) disclaimer and the Munich Kangaroo Court's double standard application with a blogger

Dear Minister of Justice Barley,

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a democratic state in possession of an educated and refined citizenry of poets and thinkers must be in want of an impartial and liberal judiciary. On the occasion of your Speech at the Conference of 44 Associations of the European Judicial Association "Independence of the Judiciary and Dangers to the Rule of Law in Europe" on 24 May 2018 in Berlin you admonished:

"That is why the rule of law in the European Union is not negotiable. The functioning of the EU as a whole is called into question if the rule of law in one Member State is not guaranteed."  (1)

Unfortunately, some courts in the province of Bavaria, and here in particular the Courts in Munich, took no heed in the past of this matter of course. They rather indulged in the opposite and keep doing so to the extent that basic rights such as the right of access to court files was denied over years. Or the constitutional right to a fair court hearing being blocked by Munich prosecutors cum judges with abandon (Art. 6 ECHR).

To make matters worse, the Court of Munich even shows resemblances of a veritable Kangaroo Court when it tramples Germany's Basic Law when a blogger is persecuted. Viz the confiscation of a smart phone without court order is de rigueur in Munich. When an explanation for this unbecoming act was requested, the incident was brushed aside by senior prosecutor Ms. Tilmann in a simple letter dated June 01, 2017 (File # GA 313E-23/2017) containing her reproachable lie I had already received an explanation. There has never materialized one! Conservatively as I was educated, I deem this to be ill behoved to a public servant.

With these deplorable instances in mind, I would like to turn to your country's Criminal Code 86a and some obvious double standards. Double standards, in particular entertained by the Kangaroo Court Munich, to the extent that I fail to grasp any clear and logical application of said CC 86a. Unless of course, your country's court rulings are caste-conscious, or, in Western terms, based on social status.

Basically, I have not the pleasure of understanding the Munich courts' incessant accusations of my person for failing to expressly distance myself from national socialist ideology when to this day I never ever came across such a disclaimer in any of your country's Fake Newspapers or insufferable TV. After all, since the leading yellow press magazine SPIEGEL rightly proclaimed: "Hitler sells" this seems even more disconcerting.

If anyone in your ministry could direct me to such a disclaimer in a news outlet I would appreciate that. All the more, as Munich courts caution explicitely against the use of swastikas "from the permissible forms of communication (taboo), in order to prevent a habituation effect". Evidence gained from German media attests the opposite, alas.

I have spared no effort in the following (and more on the blog) to point to some blatant incongruities of legal assessments in various courts in Germany about images with swastikas that leave me baffled. Perhaps it ultimately boils down to the fact that a Hartz 4 recipient such as I just lacks the proper intellectual means of grasping subtle judicial nuances in a law's application; perhaps it is just crude arbitrariness. At which point I would be remiss not to remember one salient part of your speech:

"Ladies and gentlemen, judicial independence is central to the functioning of a rule of law. Thus, in Germany too, one of the most important principles of our legal system is the independence of the individual judge. This constitutional requirement binds all government agencies and authorities."

Does not contravene CC 86a
(Prosecutor Tilmann, Munich)

Severely contravenes CC 86a

 (OLG Court Munich) and
necessitated computer confiscation.

Does not contravene CC 86a
(Prosec. Brümmer, HH)

Horrendously  contravenes CC 86a (OLG Munich)
and called for second computer
confiscation to save the nation.

     

Just fine, no contravention

German humor (no contravention acc. to
Mainz prosecutor)

Full load Hitler.
Fully in line with law. Sales good.

Am I missing something in the greater context of things? Perhaps a Straussian reading that has escaped me? Could a dive into mood affiliation assist me? Pray tell, dear Minister.

To further the communication on this particularly important subject of rule-of-law structures and their irritating implementation in enclaves of Germany I have elected to copy the respective Munich courts and the prosecution on this matter. May there be a fruitful exchange.

Please allow to presage my next letter on the interesting fact of the existence of a Censorship Trio of the Labor Agency Munich comprising three intellectual juggernaughts, the Messrs. Bechheim, Bockes and criminal blackmailer Jager (Criminal Code section 240), an individual of disagreeable countenance. Said gentlemen protected and covered by the Munich Court, the Munich police, and my fly-by-night lawyer Aglaia Muth from 2013 until July 2017! Here I could not help but remember a paragraph from your well-honed short speech:

"And we want to link the pact with a campaign for the rule of law: everyone has to understand that a rule of law can only work if its rules are respected. At the same time we have to make clear that legal action is open to anyone if he sees his rights violated by the public power."

I found the essence of that paragraph reassuring and inspiring, yet at the same time conflicting with my experience of whimsical obstruction by the Munich courts and in particular the prosecution to get a retrial. A retrial, as not even the most basic requirements of a fair court hearing had been provided and least of all by my crooked and scheming defense "lawyer" Aglaia Muth.

Dear Minister, never have I desired your good opinion more on this subject matter, a matter historically hinged so deeply with this country, as in these dire times of neonationalist motions afflicting the country. It is particularly incumbent on me who rarely changes his opinion, to be secure of judging properly at first. Pray tell your good opinion.

I would be remiss not to mention more subjects worthy to be explored in further communications where I would treasure your good opinion as well.

• Of particular interest to me would be to learn when some prosecutors in Munich elect to show a comportment of mature adults? Is there a stipulated age in Munich?
• Secondly, can it be expected from a judge to be privileged with a sufficiant command of the German language as to avoid filing a libel complaint based on a deficiency thereof?
• Can a senior prosecutor be considered snot-nosed when he forbids a critique of historic falsifcations in movies about the Nazis or is it legerdemain?
• Is judge Birkhofer-Hoffmann from the AG Munich running in competition with the Comedy Channel or should her performance be filed under 'female exuberance'?
• Is it a hallmark of exquisite professionalism when a judge on Feb. 15, 2017 tables a written decision during a court hearing that is a lie from A to Z, proven by a blog post from Burhof and SZ article a month later?
• Can a court be called completely corrupted when it covers up a fully depraved public employee who filed a complaint using a false name and his true identity is obvious and the name of the creep is Jürgen Sonneck, erstwhile deputy CEO Jobcenter Munich!
• Should I assume a malfunctioning of my hitherto excellently working bullshit detector when prosecutor Tilmann claimed in her letter dated April 12, 2018 Munich police has no transcripts of a secret phonecall made in Aug./Sept. 2012 by Censorship Trio member Bechheim?

Perhaps it can be subsumed thusly:

"There is, I believe, in every disposition a tendency to some particular evil— a natural defect, which not even the best education can overcome.”

Yours very truly and devoted,


(1) Google translate

Chancellor Merkel, allow me to introduce to you Nazi-style informer and former Jobcenter co-CEO Jurgen Sonneck alias C. Paucher

German Chancellery
Willy-Brandt-Strasse 1
10557 Berlin

May 16, 2018

Dear Chancellor Merkel,

Allow me to first congratulate you to your new term as Chancellor. Third time's a charm, they say. Four times must be considered auspicious. I would venture to call it devine.

Having said that, I am at pains to relate an unfortunate event. Unfortunate, because if memory serves me right, German public employees are the epitome of righteousness and integrity. They literally breathe devotion and commitment to their job. I think the German word is 'Pflichterfüllung'.

Sadly, for one of your public employees at a Jobcenter that mantra got lost. He went a little astray and took the career path of being the Useful Idiot of a public authority to an all new level. Some would call it dope-ass, shady-ass dealings with police under cover of the night.

May I take the liberty and introduce to you the spritely Jurgen Sonneck from the capital of the province of Bavaria, Munich. Valiant Jurgen had embarked on a career trajectory few could dream of. He was privileged to fill the esteemed and prestigious position of deputy CEO of the Jobcenter in Munich.

J. Sonneck alias C. Paucher
(vielleicht auch Big Swinging Dick?) Jürgen Sonneck, alias C. Paucher, prefers
den anonymity.
In particular on the Internet.
Hier ist er links zu sehen.

For reasons unbeknownst to me, young and balding Jurgen Sonneck took a turn to the weird side that would raise some eyebrows in circles devoted to integrity. It is certainly completely at odds of what one would expect from a public employee charged with providing social services.

On May 7, 2015 this rotten public employee and Useful Idiot Jurgen Sonneck sent an email to Munich police at 07:57:40 PM (see Police report BY 8644-001083-15/3, Kriminalfachdezernat 4) USING A FALSE NAME! Jurgen Sonneck alias C. Paucher had planned that heinous attack on us six months ahead, which goes to show what a screwed up and primitive character he is. Creepy Jurgen Sonneck did consider this blog post to be hate speech (see attachment)

Was he hungry for devious revenge, perhaps a sexual slave to the unwed then CEO of the Jobcenter Munich, Martina Musati (confer Leopold Ritter von Sacher-Masoch, Otto Weininger in 'Sex and Character' and Pierre Bourdieu in 'Masculine Domination'), who left shortly after? In any case, he could bank on the secrecy of Munich police and Kangaroo courts to cover his tracks, or so he thought.

A Nazi-style secret informer operating under a false name amongst your public employees? Was due diligence skipped on the Useful Idiot Jurgen Sonneck? Are public employees not vetted in Germany? Has his mental sanity been tested, or is your German Labor Ministry BMAS running amok? Despite various calls on the BMAS and its hideously fat labor minister in 2017, it remained steadfastly in tried and tested German tradition quiet (1).

In the course of this seedy character's attack all our IT equipment including router was confiscated. My smartphone was confiscated although there was NO COURT ORDER for that. Bloggers in your country are fair game apparently.

My Tibetan daughter was supposed to be body-searched and her smartphone to be confiscated as well. Fortunately, she had already left for school.

Her MacBook was returned in a deliberately damaged condition by the Kangaroo Court Munich. As it was of no use anymore, I sent it to your Labour Ministry in Berlin in January 2017. No response from the abominably obese then labor minister Nahles.

I had informed your Labor Ministry and the chief of Munich police about the damning evidence that everything pointed to Jurgen Sonneck. No word, everyone stayed mum and quiet. Instead, in a clandestine effort Jurgen  Sonneck was transferred to the Munich Department of Education and Sport. With all due respect, this must be an aberration.

I think we both agree, there can be no place, absolutely no place,  in public service paid by taxpayers money for a nefarious character like Jurgen Sonneck. It would send all the wrong signals.

Decency and integrity would suggest that my daughter and I receive compensation.

Lastly, dear Chancellor, based on our experience with that decrepit "social service outfit" Jobcenter Munich I would deem a thorough clean-up of this Augias Stable of utmost urgency. The criminal practices of some staff reek to high heaven. Neoliberal economic policy produces strange and disconcerting practices and breeds some of the most despicable characters of which Jurgen Sonneck certainly takes the cake.

I would be remiss not to note a decidedly doubtful sincerety of your country's intention to integrate migrants. Perhaps I am just biased.

Allow me to conclude by thanking you for your time and attention. It has been a privilege.

Sincerely,


____________
(1) That seems to be a general policy in ministerial circles as I did not get a single response when asking for email addresses of ministries. Then again, communicating was never a strong suit of these Germans.

Jurgen Sonneck alias C. Paucher considered this to be hate speech.

Oh, for ze Germans ze Disclaimer wiz regard to ze swastika.

Did the German labor agency's Censorship Trio also want to hide the Nazi past of the early German Bundesbank?

Censorship Trio Bockes-Bechheim-Jäger (Munich)

In 2012 these blokes filed a criminal complaint against me for posting this on the occasion of demonstrations in Greece against the austerity dictate of the Troika Germany against the people of Greece.

That was duly followed by the first confiscation of my computer for 25 months. The Munich, police and my court appointed "lawyer" Agalai Muth colluded against me.

Did these guys thereby also want to hide this fact?

Germany’s Central Bank Backs Study of Role in Nazi Crimes

By JACK EWING NOV.  3, 2017 FRANKFURT

In  November  1941,  Karl  Blessing,  the executive  in  charge  of  the  Nazi  petroleum  monopoly wrote  a  letter  to  a  deputy  of  Adolf  Hitler’s  chief  architect. An  apartment  belonging  to  Jews  in  Berlin  was  opening up,  and  the  executive  wanted  it. After  the  war,  Blessing  became  president  of Germany’s  central  bank.  He  was  a  legendary  figure  who helped  shape  its  hard-line  focus  on  inflation.

This is a salient part:

The  researchers  will  draw  on  foreign  central  bank archives  that  have  not  been  thoroughly  examined  before. During  the  occupation  of  Greece  by  Germany  and  Italy, for  example,  the  Reichsbank  helped  engineer  runaway inflation  that  wiped  out  the  value  of  the  local  currency and  created  a  famine.  Revelations  could  fuel  resentment in  modern  Greece,  where  many  people  blame  Germany for  the  austerity  policies  imposed  on  the  country  since 2010.

The article concludes:

The  Bundesbank  study  will  be  exhaustive,  comprising eight  volumes  when  it  is  finished.  One  flaw  with  many previous  corporate  and  government  studies  is  that  they run  to  thousands  of  pages  of  dense  German,  making  them inaccessible  —  perhaps  deliberately  so  —  to  anyone  not fluent  in  the  language. But  Mr.  Ritschl  and  Mr.  Brechtken  said  their  research will  be  translated  in  its  entirety  into  English.  Under  the current  generation  of  Bundesbank  managers  —  the president,  Jens  Weidmann,  is  49  —  “there  is  much  more openness,”  Mr.  Ritschl  said.

Full NYTimes article here

Tweets w. German Government Spokesman: Intended body search and confiscation of smartphone WITHOUT court order of Tibetan daughter of a blogger now New Normal in Germany?

Free speech in Germany? You better kiss that good-bye. Latest proof: Germany bans <linksunten.indymedia.org>. Good post in German about the weird reasons behind the decision.

However, German authorities go as well against smaller fry. Bloggers are not to their liking, unless you suck up.

One link

German Labor Min. Nahles, after I asked Munich police to investigate an IP-address, Jobcenter Munich J. Sonneck's email address not working anymore. Did he get kicked in the coglioni?

Jürgen Sonneck, alias C. Paucher, bevorzugt
den dunklen Siff der Anonymität.
Insbesondere auf dem Internet.
Hier ist er links zu sehen. Jürgen "Sexypants" Sonneck
"Such a fine piece of cookery.

Did he get "cured of drug-taking in California 

and of an Oedipus complex in Vienna." 

Gosh, I think I mixed that one up.

Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (BMAS)

Wilhelmstraße 49 (vormals Sitz des Reichsministeriums für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda unter Führung von Joseph Goebbels)

10117 Berlin

Aug. 21, 2017

Case 3 (of 3 - all brought on by German labor agencies infringing my right to free speech)

Bonjour Labor Min. Nahles,

This is just a follow-up on my last letter to you dated Aug. 20, 2017. I was just wondering, should I be concerned about the sudden non-availability of talented second-in-charge at the Jobcenter Munich Jürgen "Sexypants" Sonneck? He can not be reached at his usual email. Quel malheur, he is such a "fine piece of cookery". Pretty unsettling for me personally, such a charm and so debonair.

Not that I had a crush on him, or that we dated in a raucous manner. Nor did we ever smoke shit under a bridge or that kind of stuff. Quite the contrary.

It may be just that coincidence that I had contacted Munich police on July 11, 2017 with my kindly phrased suggestion if they could possibly investigate the IP-address 217.253.91.237 and perhaps let me know who was behind it on May 7, 2015. Sometimes I feel so inquisitive.

In addition, I asked police to mayhaps confiscate his home computer/s and get it/them forensically examined. Nothing in particular, Minister. Just a precaution from my side, or if you will, that Lenin thing.

Anyhoo, it's just when you get older you get a little prickly when some fucktard contacts police using a false name and the insipid Munich court infringes my right to free speech and gets all IT equipment confiscated. Lo and behold, it is not that "nothing could give me keener pleasure than to be m-m-m-manhandled by meaty boys". I prefer to be gently fondled on the interwebs.

Oh, did you know that according to the Pew Research Center 'Nearly half of those who have been harassed online know their harasser'. Pretty remarkable, wouldn't you agree?

Sure, different scenarios are conceivable as for his absence.

• He could have changed his name after a new marriage. The old bitch just sucked,
• he changed his career path,
• conceivable also that he got "cured of drug-taking in California and of an Oedipus complex in Vienna." Gosh, I think I mixed that one up, but
• he may have gone on a sabbatical in the Himalaya, or
• he could have been sanitized at a new office.

Man, this uncertainty is killing me. Some form of enlightenment could have a soothing effect.

Meanwhile I remain with regards,

German Labor Ministry, please the name of the frigtard public employee that contacted police using a false name! Presto!

Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (BMAS)
Wilhelmstraße 49 (vormals Sitz des Reichsministeriums für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda unter Führung von Joseph Goebbels)
10117 Berlin

Aug. 20, 2017

Case 3 (of 3 - all brought on by German labor agencies infringing my right to free speech)

G'day Labor Minister Nahles,

Your weeks are winding down being the minister of what gets an economy based on neoliberal standards rolling. Cheap labor that is, bedded in a government-guaranteed and accepted level of unemployment.

This might be just the perfect time to make good on a principle so dear to a liberal - and I mean that in the purest and unadulterated of terms, i.e. not politically tainted - state. Or, as John Stuart Mill phrased it in 'On Liberty':

"The object of this Essay  email is to assert one very simple principle, as entitled to govern absolutely the dealings of society with the individual in the way of compulsion and control, whether the means used be physical force in the form of legal penalties, or the moral coercion of public opinion. That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."

I am sure this great thinker did not envision self-protection of a community to entail ratfucking by a public employee in a Cartmanesque style using a false name when infringing free speech. Alas, you and your ministry's domain seem to have a different view and etiquette.

So with this "only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community" in mind, I suggest that you get me the name of that individual public employee of the - with 99,9999% certainty - Jobcenter Munich that contacted Munich police on May 7, 2015 using a false name.

It is very easily done. Call the following persons and press for the answer:

• Martina Musati, presently with the labor agency in Stuttgart and till May/June 2015 head of the Jobcenter Munich,
• Anette Farrenkopf, Jobcenter Munich and
• Sabine Nowack, Jobcenter Munich-Pasing.

Here is again the IP address lookup of that wang ba dan.

I will not stop until I have the name of that frigtard!

It goes without saying that I expect a full replacement of my daughter's confiscated MacBook Pro that was returned by the Munich court in a damaged state and has been sent to your ministry in January 2017.

Thank you,

Advice for German Labor Ministry BMAS on how their goon (goons?) better avoid detection when ratting on a blogger using a false name.

Critical blogger? Confiscate computer!
SimpleSS.

Labor Minister Nahles,

Just how appallingly primitive are you Germans? A public employee of yours emails police using a false name? Are you shittin' me, minister?

Here's some advice when your goon/s go against free speech next time. In other fucking words, ME! Or try to get a blogger down. Or his computer confiscated with the intent on getting his fucking blog purged. Mine, that is.

Better totally forget the latter, minister! No fucking chance. Never. Like in, NOT EVA. Capisce!

However, before I disseminate my awesome mind-boggling wisdom, I would like to caution. Caution, because a politician always has at least one backdoor through which he/she can escape from any responsibility. Like that state gov versus federal gov bullshit. So here goes. I am referring to this Pdf: "Bundesministerium  für  Arbeit  und  Soziales  (BMAS) (Einzelplan  11)". That pretty much explains what the BMAS does and its relations.

Having said that, here now comes the advice, Labor Minister.

• Firstly, you need to reign in the earth-shattering stupidity of some of your underlings. Now that's easier said than done because, you know, Slavoj Žižek.
• A cover based on the trust in others is a bad cover. It will blow up sooner or later. Even more so when that cover is open to legal dispute.
• Watching the timeline is crucial, otherwise a fucking idiot gives​ himself away if the dots on that timeline are obviously connected to a separate and similar instance.

Finally, the advice:

Your fucking public employee shitface should have used an Anonymizer. Yeah dipshit, that thing that you can find on the intertubes, and not only one. Instead, your brain-dead dickhead used a - tremble, shudder, total consternation, cross-eyed stare, pissing in my pants - a false name. Your scumbag forgot that I can get access to the case files, and I did. The magic was an ECHR decision.

Minister, I feel privileged​ to be of service. Better luck next time.

. . . . . . .

German Labor Ministry, please the name of the frigtard public employee that contacted police using a false name! Presto!

Tweets w. German Ministry of Justice: Confiscation of blogger's smartphone without court order OK in Germany?

One link

Free speech in Germany? You have got to be kidding.

Tweet to police Munich re.phone call in 2012

Tweet to Munich Police in reference to the criminal complaint of Christian Bockes from the Labor Agency Munich from 2012 (!) who has a hard time coming to terms with something called free speech in Germany.

Rather prefers the confiscation of a computer to get rid of some critical posts.

Yes, from 2012 as Bavarian Courts, the German Ministry of Labor in Berlin and my colluding "lawyer" did their best to keep it under wraps for all those years.

Free speech in Germany? You have got to be kidding.

For your information, Justice Minister Maas: To suppress free speech Germany's courts are rigged and deliberately break laws. You did not know this?

Case 1 (of 3 - all brought on by German labor agencies infringing my right to free speech)

cc Labor Min. Nahles

Dear Justice Minister Maas,

Free speech is a fickle thing. Better to get rid of it when coming from a blogger. German style. ORDNUNG! Roland-Freisler-like.

Contravenes German law, because posted by blogger.

Does NOT contravene law,
bcs posted by newspaper

As a lawyer you are most certainly familiar with Section 243 of the STPO.
In a telephone conversation immediately after the inspection of the case files, my former court appointed lawyer and crook Aglaia Muth informed me accordingly: 'I have spoken to Judge Grain and I must say I tend towards him.' (That the Merkel Nazi caricature was contrary to § 86 a STGB.) So there was a pretrial conversation between the judge and "my" lawyer!

However, this is not mentioned in the protocol of the court hearing and neither did Judge Grain make any reference during the court hearing if any conversations had taken place. This is a breach of law as Section 243 of the STPO Paragraph 4 reads as follows:

(4) The chairman shall state whether discussions have taken place pursuant to §§ 202a, 212 if the object of the meeting was the possibility of an understanding (§ 257c), and if so, its essential content.

I can not prove this phone conversation but the fact that the Munich court and my court appointed lawyer and crook Aglaia Muth to this day (for more than 4 years) have refused to release the 19-page letter of the blackmailer Manfred Jäger, presently the chief of the Labor Agency Ingolstadt, leaves a very bad taste because said letter is the SMOKING GUN !!!

Enter a very recent decision of the BUNDESGERICHTSHOFS 1 StR 622/16 of 21 March 2017:

12 2. There is a breach of the obligation to provide information under section 243 para. 4 sentence 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(A) According to this provision, the chairman, after reading the sentence of the prosecution and before the defendant 's instruction and interrogation, has to state whether discussions have taken place pursuant to Sections 202a, 212 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if the subject matter was the possibility of an agreement (§ 257c of the Code of Criminal Procedure) If so, their essential content. The obligation to provide information under Section 243 (4) sentence 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure applies to all preliminary hearings aimed at reaching an agreement (see BGH, judgment of 13 February 2014 - 1 StR 423/13, NStZ 2014, 217 mwN).

...

16 a) In the event of breaches of the obligation to provide information under Section 243 (4) Sentence 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is regularly assumed that the judgment is based on this infringement; Except in exceptional cases (see only BGH, judgment of 13 February 2014 - 1 StR 423/13, NStZ 2014, 217 mwN). As the Federal Constitutional Court pointed out in detail in its judgment of 19 March 2013 - 2 BvR 2628/10 (NJW 2013, 1058, 1065), the legislature considers it possible to reach an agreement only if the comprehensive transparency and documentation obligations are observed (BVerfG, judgment of 19 March 2013 - 2 BvR 2628/10, NJW 2013, 1058, 1066) is an inseparable unit of authorization and restriction of understandings while at the same time being subject to notification, instruction and documentation obligations. As a result, any violation of such legal provisions will "mash" the communication as a whole and thus lead to the unlawfulness of the communication.

This conscious omission by the judge is no surprise insofar as he had already insinuated in a prior letter to me that I could be submitted to a Mental Health Assessment and that admitting my guilt could have positive effects. Free speech has to be suppressed. If that involves breaking laws, why would a German judge and a colluding lawyer care?

May I quote one of your former countrymen? The one with the weird hairdo. “I shall not rest until every German sees that it is a shameful thing to be a lawyer.” Not necessary these days as some German lawyers do not feel any shame, or as one lawyer from the US wrote to me in an email "many German lawyers are assholes".

Justice Minister of Germany, you Germans have it all figured out, right? Figured out, based on your proud Nazi past that keeps on living and thriving clandestinely - ecologically sanitized by your section 86 STGB - and subtly garnished with a healthy dose of social class-based court decisions, according to which any sort of critique of your inhuman neoliberal Hartz concept must be vigorously suppressed. Need I add that I am pressing for a retrial with criminal Manfred Jäger as witness for questioning?

Care to hear about yet another case involving the breach of law? You came to the right place in rotten Bavaria with a letter about Case 2 in about a week. This time sprinkled with a pinch of racism. Would not be Germany without it, would it Minister? Who is involved? One of your social-fascist Jobcenters.

I reiterate firmly: No German infringes my right to freedom of expression!

As always best regards,

German Justice Minister Maas, Labor Minister Nahles, where is the difference that makes one Merkel-Nazi caricature a criminal offense?

Case 1 (of 3 - all brought on by German labor agencies infringing my right to free speech)

cc Labor Minister Nahles,


Dear Justice Minister Maas,

Politeness obliges me to first congratulate you on having joined the illustrious circle of literati as a purveyor of very fine prose. The reviews on Amazon so far are promising. The unfortunate departure of Karl-Theodor Maria Nikolaus Johann Jacob Philipp Franz Joseph Sylvester Buhl-Freiherr von und zu Guttenberg had had created a poignant intellectual vacuum. It has been more than replenished now. I feel inclined to say with Victor Hugo: "You invest the heaven of art with we know not what deadly rays; you create a new shudder".

From what I gather, you also seem to be the eminent authority on all things #hatespeech and you see it as your "responsibility to eradicate criminal content" on the internet. (1) (2)

Fair enough. The good news is, you are not alone in this endeavor as one overweight bloke and chief of your country's Labor Agency in Ingolstadt, Mr Manfred Jager,

Manfred Jager
& the "German Aryan Internet"

saw himself as the guardian of decent, clean and uncontroversial internet content - may I call it "German Aryan Internet"? - and filed a criminal complaint against me, a blogger, for reposting this then well-known Merkel-Nazi caricature. (Pic below)

Again​, it is obviously a caricature. This may have been lost on the German psyche as humor is not exactly the strong suit of your countrymen. Oops, forgot the women, politically incorrect that I am.

The occasion in 2012 was your country's attack on the free people of Greece with Weapons of Financial Mass Destruction (lasting to this very day and on) courtesy three "institutions". Other German news sites reported with a similar caricature. (see examples below)

However, it is to be assumed, Mr Jager either lacked the balls to file a complaint against them or wanted to silence a despicable blogger who dares to put in pixeltime against the inhuman Hartz 4 concept. Stupid and lacking any sort of refinement, Mr Jager backed it up with a ridiculous financial threat - some may call it blackmailing - by asking for € 10,000, thereby giving proof that he does not even know the basics of game theory.

Subsequently, my computer was confiscated for 25 months and I was convicted in a court case that was rigged from the very start by the judge and my colluding court appointed lawyer and crook Aglaia Muth from Munich. One of your lieutenants, Dr. Franz, preferred to display his cold shoulder towards me. Fritzling things away and keeping quiet worked quite well in Nazi times and the Germans stick to it, or so it seems. (3)

Anyhoo, Justice Minister & Labor Minister of Germany, could you kindly explain to me (and perhaps some readers of this post) why does my posted Merkel-Nazi caricature contravene § 86 a STGB and the others do not?

Perhaps critical bloggers are considered by your Bavarian kangaroo courts as

• Pariahs and second-rate people in Germany, or
• potentially mentally retarded as Munich Judge Grain phrased it in a letter, or
• forfeit automatically their right to free speech once they feel the generous comforts of Hartz 4, or
• just prove the Turkish president Erdogan and his Foreign Minister's assessment correct, that Germany is "a totally repressive system" and "all practices resemble those of the Nazi era." After all, he is a contract partner of your government and should know.

I am looking forward hearing from you and would like to add that in light of so far three separate  instances of infringement of my right to free speech, all perpetrated by staff of German labor agencies, I will have to call on you again shortly. This time with regard to a decision by the 'Bundesgerichtshof 1StR622/16 of March 21, 2017' pertaining to a law that seemed to interest judge Grain and my court appointed lawyer Aglaia Muth absolute fuck. You do have strange courts.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

________
(1) a domain btw where Germany is an absolute ZERO.
(2) your legal framework is not exactly well received in knowledgeable circles like media law expert Prof. Dr. Marc Liesching who calls it fittingly the "Free-speech-fighting law" that will be overturned by the Constitutional Court.
(3) I should be in a position to judge as I have a German birth certificate. However, that is all there is to my "German-ness" and I feel no need for a pretentious German 'Leitkultur'. It's other peoples and their way of life and culture that interest me. Besides, I have no problem with a fucking burka. I do have a problem though with your unrelenting and constant Nazi "documentaries" on your boring German TV, financed by a mandatory Goebbels-Propaganda-Fee. All under the guise of education. Oh, and I have a problem with fucking Christian missionaries in South Asia. Saw those assholes under various guises almost daily. No Hindu, Buddhist or Muslim ever tried to convert or coax me. They have style and personality.

German Labor Minister Nahles, reign in your criminals. Stop the Nazi methods! Have you heard of free speech and Article 6 ECHR?

German Labor Minister Nahles condones
criminal conduct.

Case 1 (of 3 - all brought on by German labor agencies infringing my right to free speech)







Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (BMAS)

Wilhelmstraße 49 (vormals Sitz des Reichsministeriums für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda unter Führung von Joseph Goebbels)
10117 Berlin

May 31, 2017

German Labor Minister Nahles,

Sitting on the sidelines and remaining mum despite various calls on you concerning criminal activities by staff from public authorities under your domain won't do. No matter who you are, or believe to be, your comportment is completely unacceptable.

Having said that, I want to make some points absolutely clear to you:

• Nofuckingbody from any public authority under your Ministry's domain ever blackmails me! Is that fucking understood?
• Absofuckinglutely nobody infringes my right to free speech! Do you fucking dig that?

This overweight dude, chief of the Labor Agency Ingolstadt Manfred Jager pictured here (on the right)

Manfred Jager demands take-down of blog post,
or payment of € 10,000.

had the audacity to demand euro ten thousand unless I delete a blog post.

Told the idiotic bloke to take a fucking hike in a nearby forest, or strangle a couple ducks in the city park, perhaps bang his secretary on the photocopier, whatevs. Oh wait, I guess I phrased it slightly more philosophical.



Then he sent a criminal complaint about this Merkel-Nazi caricature to the police in Munich.

German Labor Ministry et al. irked by this Merkel-Nazi caricature.

Surprisingly not regarding these here, and they are just two examples.

As I told you in a letter dated Jan. 31, 2017 and subsequently in a second letter dated Feb. 28, 2017 which you did not consider necessary to respond to, there is a 19-page letter from Manfred Jager mailed​ to the police in Munich.

This letter is deliberately held back by the court in Munich, the crooked lawyer Aglaia Muth from Munich, the sender himself, and YOU! There must be a reason for the refusal to disclose it and indeed there is:

The letter is the smoking gun !!!

Once this letter sees the light of day, the whole trial and verdict against me will be blown apart.

Andrea Nahles, make sure I get that fucking letter! You are covering a criminal! Secondly, you are in breach of EU law, Article 6 ECHR to be precise! You seem to care shit.

The whole court case against me was a plot from A to Z and led to the confiscation of my computer for 25 months. With regard to the plot, Justice Minister Maas will receive a letter detailing the law-breaking conduct of judge Grain from Munich and crooked lawyer Aglaia Muth.

Crooked lawyer Aglaia Muth, Munich

You seem to believe Hartz 4 recipients forfeit the right to free speech. You could not be more wrong. You Ugly Germans might want to acquaint yourselves with the concept of free speech. Have you personally heard of it, Minister?

Seriously, don't fuck with my right to free speech and do not send me a bullshit letter like the last one from one of your little whippersnappers, that Mr Thomas Grünthal.

OK, this is Case 1. A letter concerning Case 2 and the Jobcenter Munich's useful idiot Jurgen 'Sexypants' Sonneck will come within a week and I can tell you upfront, Case 3 will be so fucking awesome that I have labelled it with the German file name DFBD 'Deutsche Faschistische Behörden-Drecksau', or in plain French 'German Fascist Public Authority Shitface'. Trust me, it's gonna blow the readers' pants off. Oh, the Interior Min. de Maizière will be asked for help in a request with Deutsche Telecom to get that person's true identity disclosed.

I am well aware though, that the Ugly German has a primitive trait, Minister. So no surprise on my side as to what measures German government agency staff are able to resort to. And do not forget the letter!

Best regards,

Procrustian Lady judge Birkhofer-Hoffmann views ECHR decisions as foreign interventions without any relevance for the Province of Bavaria and its judiciary

In her judgment and reasoning on February 15, 2017, Munich Judge Birkhofer-Hoffmann from the juridical epicenter of the Province of Bavaria declared literally and brazenly "Here German law applies". This was clearly in reference to my citing of ECHR decisions to which she took exception.

Fair enough, able Judge. However, ECHR decisions do not denigrate or invalidate the justice system of the sovereign state of Germany, of which the Province of Bavaria - and one should be glad about the existence of this Bavarian enclave, as she has been providing and continues to provide an insight into the way of thinking and genesis of the human species of some 150 years ago; if you will, it resembles an open zoo with at times pleasant and quaint entertainment - is a part. The former has granted itself the luxury of a Federal Constitutional Court which from time to time has the peculiarity, some might call it audacity, of publishing a decision on a case in writing. Such an event occurred for example in October 2004 under the heading

To take account of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights by national authorities, in particular German courts.

Against this background and the fact that the FRG is embedded in the EU as a member state which has signed the European Convention on Human Rights in 1952, a statement such as this judge's as in the minutes of the court hearing of February 15, 2017 on page 8 makes for disconcerting reading:

 "The purpose of the final word is not to refer to case decisions of other countries and of the MRGH (sic!) ."

With all due respect, the Lady Judge from the Alpine province might want to reconsider her phrasing. Refinement is not a forte of bucolic Bavaria and its peasants.

In other words, following the French ethical code of the judges: "Judgment in an independent manner is also a state of mind"; or, to quote Lord Hope of Craighead from the other side of the English Channel - independence is in the hearts and minds of the judges. "Eric J. Maitrepierre, Director of the International and European Department of the Ministry of Justice, Paris, In 'ETHICS, DEONTOLOGY, DISCIPLINE OF JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN FRANCE'.

Good Lordy, again someone from abroad.

German Ministry of Justice, I can not help but agree with Turkish President Erdogan and his Foreign Minister Cavusoglu in their assessment of German methods that they "resemble those of the Nazi era."

Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz
c/o Dr. K. Franz
11015 Berlin

cc "Lawyer" Aglaia Muth, Munich (by Email)
cc via Twitter to Mr Uniyal (Gatestone Institute)

AZ: RB1 - AR (2016) - RB 113/2016

March 9, 2017

Dear Undersecretary Dr. Franz,

With your permission I choose to answer in English as the Gatestone Institute fortuitously published a pertinent article titled "Germany's Jihad on Freedom of Speech" and penned by the Indian gentleman Mr Uniyal on the subject of free speech in Germany, or rather the increasing lack of it (1). Saliently, the article touches the heavy-handed actions of German authorities when Chancellor Merkel is mocked. An experience I can confirm firsthand.

Thank you for your short reply to my letter dated Feb. 18, 2017 with regard to infringement of free speech, the subject having been a picture of chancellor Merkel clad in a Nazi uniform with swastika on the 2012 occasion of the vicious and atrocious attack of EU Financial Forces of Mass Destruction under the Führership of Germany reported and displayed in major news outlets all over the world. A letter, in which I particularly took issue about how my complaints about my court appointed crooked "defense lawyer" Ms Aglaia Muth from Munich were brushed off by two arbitration boards in Munich and Berlin.

In your letter you reaffirmed the decisions of those arbitration boards and I quote your letter here:

Dear Mr ...,

Thank you for your letter to Mr Heiko Maas, Federal Minister of Justice and Consumer Protection, in which you informed him that the Office of the Federal Prosecutor had referred you to the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection, because this had legal oversight on the arbitration body of the lawyer's office. You describe a legal issue in which you were represented by a Munich attorney. Mr. Federal Minister of Justice and Consumer Protection has asked me to answer you.

The Supervision of the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection extends as a pure legal oversight to the fact that the conciliation agency complies in its -  independent of the content and not subjected to a review - activity with the legal requirements of § 191f of the Federal Law on Public Prosecution. I can not infer from your letter any indications for an unlawful activity of the arbitration body which does not comply with legal requirements. I therefore ask for your understanding that I will not continue to work on the matter you have described. (edited Google translate)

Your assessment is puzzling in that I had described in detail my crooked "lawyer's" total and complete disinterest to defend me in any form whatsoever. Furthermore, I clearly indicated how this cunning lawyer colluded with the court and even refused to disclose the complaint letter sent to Munich police by Mr Manfred Jäger, a rather primitive bully and blackmailer, and presently head of the federal labor agency Ingolstadt. In plain terms, "lawyer" Muth is a criminal, covered by the 'Arbitration Board of Lawyers' in Berlin. Taking money without providing a service is fraud! In that sense, the 'Arbitration Board of Lawyers' in Berlin is condoning fraud!

Firstly, this constitutes a clear breach of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights of which Germany is a signatory and secondly, interesting to see how a head of a local government agency feels compelled to question the legality of a picture of Merkel posted by a blogger when he obviously had no such reservations about like pictures in German news outlets as shown below.














Strong objections though from bully Jäger (his 19-page letter to police still held back by the rotten Munich Court and crooked and conniving "lawyer" Muth and, of course, the blackmailer himself!) against this picture to the right below.

Merkel - persona non grata

I am even more surprised that you did not comment on my "Report to EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS on relentless infringements of free speech by German Jobcenter in collusion with Munich Court" sent to the ECHR in Strasbourg in Oct. 2016. A report, in which I describe the concerted efforts of law enforcement agencies, government agencies and conniving lawyer(s) to quell free speech and confiscate all our IT equipment!

In addition, you gave the impression of being unconcerned about concerted actions against me by way of financial destruction of a blogger with intended subsequent imprisonment due to forced default!

As I mentioned above, the Gatestone Institute published an article on March 6, 2017 under the headline "Germany's Jihad on Freedom of Speech" by Vijeta Uniyal.

It starts off with the following statement:

In Merkel's Germany, you are allowed to walk free after setting fire to a synagogue, but not for mocking the Chancellor's "sacred" refugee policy.

The article paints a picture that is all too familiar to me in that the Munich Kangaroo Court - steadfastly refusing a retrial of the sham court hearing -, government agencies and Munich police are in bed together to shut me down as a blogger and get me finally imprisoned by financial attrition. Even by breaking EU law!

Picture: Merkel behind bars.

The Carnival parade float from Bad Bergzabern, Germany, that triggered an investigation by the police and State Attorney, showing Chancellor Angela Merkel behind prison bars, with the caption: "This is how traitors end up." (Image source: SWF video screenshot)

. . . . . . . .

Criticizing Germany's notorious Jobcenters as criminal agencies for the provision of cheap labor and poverty and Germany's heinous actions against Greece has to be cracked down upon with all force.

If memory serves me right, your Ministry has harnessed the services of a questionable foundation, whose head has had Stasi connections and which is funded among others by the German Ministry for Family Affairs, to quell free speech, or "hate speech" as the trope goes. As a father I feel a tad irritated.

I can not help but agree with Turkish President Erdogan and his Foreign Minister Cavusoglu when the latter recently assessed Germany as "a totally repressive system" and "All practices resemble those of the Nazi era." Theodor Adorno was so right in his warning back then.

I might add that these commenters here do not see the 'Arbitration Board of Lawyers' in Berlin, which is under the supervision of your Ministry, in a good and trustworthy light. I can only second their statements based on my own experience in two instances. It is a front organization and a sham.

As I already indicated, I shall send another letter as soon as I get the scandalous verdict in writing of the mendacious judge Bassler from the LG Munich Kangaroo Court in the latest case against me - filed by a person of the Jobcenter Munich under a FALSE name - infringing yet again my right to free speech and subsequently followed up by confiscation of my smartphone WITHOUT court approval and all IT equipment! Since Feb. 15, 2017 I refer to the Bavarian judiciary only under the moniker 'Bavarian Roland Freisler Courts'. I am afraid, there is no free speech in Germany!

Sincerely,
______________
(1) The second reason for writing in the English language is your country's propensity to request deletion of content that is not liked from the internet. I strongly believe in the First Amendment.