ECHR covers Munich criminal civil servant Jürgen Sonneck operating under false name "C. Paucher" (Case 51482/18)

Criminal, Useful Idiot cum civil servant Jürgen Sonneck

Here is the Useful Idiot cum civil servant Jürgen Sonneck pictured.

Part of the blame has to be levelled at the rotten Munich Court. With their unrelenting refusal to grant any access to court files over years, Jürgen Sonneck felt absolutely cock sure he would stay under the radar undetected. That's why he did not deem it necessary to move his fucking ass. Like driving to a café at the south shore of Lake Starnberg or take a train to Lengries or Tegernsee. No, Jürgen chose his home. In the evening. After work. Everything was planned six months before. What could possibly go wrong?

Once I managed to blow his cover (via IP address, damning conspicuous circumstantial evidence) I went on full attack mode against J.S. with a barrage of PDFs to the President of Munich police and various Federal Government Ministries in Berlin in June/July 2017 (here, here, here, here, here and here - all in German). Oh, in typical German fashion no one responded.

Mid July 2017 the Useful Idiot Jürgen Sonneck was hastily shifted under cover of the night from his former post as deputy CEO at the Jobcenter Munich to the Department for Education and Sport Munich.

. . . . . . . . .

Excerpt from complaint: "At around 8:45 am on October 28, 2015, two plainclothes policemen and a policewoman appeared and demanded admission on presentation of a Judgmental Decree (Annex 3) dated Oct. 8, 2015, which was not signed by the judge. A male police officer immediately rushed to the door to the complainant's daughter's room and threw it open without knocking. The daughter of the complainant, however, was already in school. During the trial, the complainant was physically searched and it was obvious that the female police officer was supposed to body-search his daughter. The apartment was photographed and also the house from the outside. All IT equipment including router was confiscated, because a blogger had to be rendered incapable of any access to the Internet. This was the second computer confiscation after 2013 (then for 25 months without financial compensation!). This as well after a criminal complaint by the Munich labor office. Although the confiscation of the smartphone was not mentioned in the Judgmental Decree, this too was confiscated (Annex 5). The same was undoubtedly planned with his daughter's smartphone."

. . . . . . . . .

None of this interests the ECHR which had already turned heads with its ridiculous blasphemy decision just months earlier. As one commenter on REASON wrote:

"But seriously, the ECtHR is not a national supreme/constitutional court, and so on some issues they play the "margin of appreciation" card rather than getting stuck in thorny political issues."

Computer of migrant daughter deliberately damaged by the rotten Munich Court. That is of no concern to the ECHR. Just stop blogging critical stuff about German Jobcenters and you are fine (Case 51482/18)

ECHR declares, Marissa Mayer meme contravenes German Criminal Code Section 86a "Use of Symbols of Nazi Organizations" (Case 51482/18)

The law perverted! The law—and, in its wake, 
all the collective forces of the nation—the law, 
I say, not only diverted from its proper direction, 
but made to pursue one entirely contrary!

Frédéric Bastiat 

Hear ye, hear ye, hear ye. The European Court of Human Rights sees this Marissa Mayer meme NOT covered by Article 10 ECHR.

ECHR does not like the Marissa Mayer meme

And since we at the ECHR do not want to deal with such crap from low-life bloggers we will shred your shit in a year's time. Capisce! Because that's how Single-Judge-Decisions work.

"The Court shall not keep the file in its archives for more than one year from the date of this decision."

Meanwhile German prosecutors have their very own views.

So coincidentally and related the Hamburg prosecutor declared this Hitler image in BENTO (an online youth magazine of DER SPIEGEL) as NOT contravening Criminal Code Section 86a (File #: 7101 Js 742/17).

This Hitler image is fine because it is from DER SPIEGEL
which is the journalistic gold standard.

Likewise in rotten Munich Court. Munich prosecutor Tilmann finds this Merkel-Nazi image in the Munich fake news gazette 'MERKUR' A-OK.

Merkel-Nazi image works well with Munich Court. Double standards anyone?

Bonus trivia: The European Court of Justice has for the umpteenth time to decide about that piece of cloth worn on a head, aka head scarf. It's been called on from, where else, Germany. Good-golly.

ECHR covers Munich criminal civil servant Jürgen Sonneck operating under false name "C. Paucher" (Case 51482/18)

Lektion Nr. 6 für AG, LG und OLG München: Richterin Basslers verquere Auslassung ist typischer ignoratio elenchi

Gemeint ist dies: "Es ist bei dem Bild auch nicht erkennbar, dass sich der Angeklagte eindeutig gegen den Nationalsozialismus ausspricht".

Beispiel Godwin's law im unteren Bild.


Peirce's Theory of Signs

The sign

In one of his many definitions of a sign, Peirce writes:

I define a sign as anything which is so determined by something else, called its Object, and so determines an effect upon a person, which effect I call its interpretant, that the later is thereby mediately determined by the former. (EP2, 478)

What we see here is Peirce's basic claim that signs consist of three inter-related parts: a sign, an object, and an interpretant. For the sake of simplicity, we can think of the sign as the signifier, for example, a written word, an utterance, smoke as a sign for fire etc. The object, on the other hand, is best thought of as whatever is signified, for example, the object to which the written or uttered word attaches, or the fire signified by the smoke. The interpretant, the most innovative and distinctive feature of Peirce's account, is best thought of as the understanding that we have of the sign/object relation. The importance of the interpretant for Peirce is that signification is not a simple dyadic relationship between sign and object: a sign signifies only in being interpreted. This makes the interpretant central to the content of the sign, in that, the meaning of a sign is manifest in the interpretation that it generates in sign users. Things are, however, slightly more complex than this and we shall look at these three elements in more detail.

The Object

Just as with the sign, not every characteristic of the object is relevant to signification: only certain features of an object enable a sign to signify it. For Peirce, the relationship between the object of a sign and the sign that represents it is one of determination: the object determines the sign. Peirce's notion of determination is by no means clear and it is open to interpretation, but for our purposes, it is perhaps best understood as the placing of constraints or conditions on successful signification by the object, rather than the object causing or generating the sign. The idea is that the object imposes certain parameters that a sign must fall within if it is to represent that object. However, only certain characteristics of an object are relevant to this process of determination. To see this in terms of an example, consider again the case of the molehill.

The sign is the molehill, and the object of this sign is the mole. The mole determines the sign, in as much as, if the molehill is to succeed as a sign for the mole it must show the physical presence of the mole. If it fails to do this, it fails to be a sign of that object. Other signs for this object, apart from the molehill, might include the presence of mole droppings, or a particular pattern of ground subsidence on my lawns, but all such signs are constrained by the need to show the physical presence of the mole. Clearly, not everything about the mole is relevant to this constraining process: the mole might be a conventional black color or an albino, it might be male or female, it might be young or old. None of these features, however, are essential to the constraints placed upon the sign. Rather, the causal connection between it and the mole is the characteristic that it imposes upon its sign, and it is this connection that the sign must represent if it is to succeed in signifying the mole.

The Interpretant

Although there are many features of the interpretant that bear further comment, here we shall mention just two. First, although we have characterized the interpretant as the understanding we reach of some sign/object relation, it is perhaps more properly thought of as the translation or development of the original sign. The idea is that the interpretant provides a translation of the sign, allowing us a more complex understanding of the sign's object. Indeed, Liszka (1996) and Savan (1988) both emphasize the need to treat interpretants as translations, with Savan even suggesting Peirce should have called it the translatant (Savan 1988, 41). Second, just as with the sign/object relation, Peirce believes the sign/interpretant relation to be one of determination: the sign determines an interpretant. Further, this determination is not determination in any causal sense, rather, the sign determines an interpretant by using certain features of the way the sign signifies its object to generate and shape our understanding. So, the way that smoke generates or determines an interpretant sign of its object, fire, is by focusing our attention upon the physical connection between smoke and fire.

For Peirce, then, any instance of signification contains a sign-vehicle, an object and interpretant. Moreover, the object determines the sign by placing constraints which any sign must meet if it is to signify the object. Consequently, the sign signifies its object only in virtue of some of its features. Additionally, the sign determines an interpretant by focusing our understanding on certain features of the signifying relation between sign and object. This enables us to understand the object of the sign more fully.

Although this is a general picture of Peirce's ideas about sign structure, and certain features are more or less present, or given greater or lesser emphasis at various points in Peirce's development of his theory of signs, this triadic structure and the relation between the elements is present in all of Peirce's accounts. In what follows, we shall see three of Peirce's attempts at giving a full account of signs and signification, the corresponding sign typologies, look at the transitions between these accounts, and examine some of the issues that arise from them.

Sign-Vehicles

Recall that Peirce thought signs signify their objects not through all their features, but in virtue of some particular feature. By 1903, for reasons related to his work on phenomenology, Peirce thought the central features of sign-vehicles could be divided into three broad areas, and consequently, that signs could be classified accordingly. This division depends upon whether sign-vehicles signify in virtue of qualities, existential facts, or conventions and laws. Further, signs with these sign-vehicles are classified as qualisigns, sinsigns, and legisigns respectively.

Examples of signs whose sign-vehicle relies upon a quality are difficult to imagine, but a particularly clear example, used by David Savan, is this:

[…] I use a color chip to identify the color of some paint I want to buy. The color chip is perhaps made of cardboard, rectangular, resting on a wooden table etc., etc. But it is only the color of the chip that is essential to it as a sign of the color of the paint. (Savan 1988, 20)

There are many elements to the colored chip as a sign, but it is only its color that matters to its ability to signify. Any sign whose sign-vehicle relies, as with this example, on simple abstracted qualities is called a qualisign.

An example of a sign whose sign-vehicle uses existential facts is smoke as a sign for fire; the causal relation between the fire and smoke allows the smoke to act as a signifier. Other cases are the molehill example used earlier, and temperature as a sign for a fever. Any sign whose signvehicle relies upon existential connections with its object is named, by Peirce, a sinsign.

And finally, the third kind of sign is one whose crucial signifying element is primarily due to convention, habit or law. Typical examples would be traffic lights as sign of priority, and the signifying capability of words; these sign-vehicles signify in virtue of the conventions surrounding their use. Peirce calls signs whose sign-vehicles function in this way legisigns.

Interpretants

As with the sign-vehicle and the object, Peirce thought we could classify signs in terms of their relation with their interpretant. Again, he identifies three categories according to which feature of the relationship with its object a sign uses in generating an interpretant. Further, as with the classification of the sign in terms of the sign-vehicle and the object, Peirce identifies qualities, existential facts, or conventional features as the basis for classifying the sign in terms of its interpretant. ...

Godwin's law

Das Sign ist Godwin's law und das Hakenkreuz als Verbildlichung. Das Object sind die Leute im Bild. Die Leute im Bild bestimmen das Sign insofern, als sie für die Umsetzung des "Gesetzes" Voraussetzung sind. Die Leute verbildlichen die Diskutanten, den Diskussionsverlauf. Der Interpretant ist das Verständnis, das wir von der Zeichen-Objekt-Beziehung erreichen.

Richterin Basslers interessiert verquere Auslassung "es ist bei dem Bild auch nicht erkennbar, dass sich der Angeklagte eindeutig gegen den Nationalsozialismus ausspricht" wäre auch bei diesem Beispiel wie beim Marissa Mayer Meme ein typischer ignoratio elenchi. Simpler und überzeugender kann man es auch beeindruckende und hintertriebene Idiotie nennen.


Memes as Visual Rhetoric

The visual rhetoric approach combines elements of the semiotic and discursive approaches to analyze the persuasive elements of visual texts. Visual rhetoric understands visual texts as created to construct meaning (Foss, 2004, p. 304). Rhetoric is also considered to be persuasive. Blair (2004) notes that visual arguments have a unique ability to draw viewers into the argument’s construction via the viewer’s cognitive role in completing “visual enthymemes” to fill in the unstated premise (p. 59). Rhetoric relies heavily on stylistic devices—such as metaphor—for persuasive purposes (Kenney, 2002, p. 57). Edwards (2004) examines the manner in which iconic images become a type of metaphor for national sentiment; these images can be recontextualized for “symbolic association ... by metaphor or allegory” (p. 189). By considering memes as discourse and analyzing the semiotic elements in memes, researchers can examine how memes operate as rhetoric. A comparison of the semiotic, discursive and rhetorical approaches can be seen in Table 1.

Memes are more than internet humor; research shows them to function by appropriation and resistance to dominant media messages. By examining how memes can operate in subversive and representational ways, this paper offers scholars a framework for the study of memes as symbolic, persuasive texts. Just as the application of visual rhetoric expands general rhetorical theory by acknowledging “the role of the visual in our world” (Foss, 2004, p. 310), examining memes as a form of rhetoric can expand understanding of the way memes function in a participatory media culture.

Subversive Memes: Internet Memes as a Form of Visual Rhetoric
Heidi E. Huntington - Colorado State University


Memes in a Digital World: Reconciling with a Conceptual Troublemaker

Limor Shifman
Department of Communication and Journalism, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91905, Israel


I suggest looking at Internet memes not as single ideas or formulas that propagated well, but as groups of content items that were created with awareness of each other and share common characteristics. Going back to Dawkins’ original idea—that memes are units of imitation—I find it useful to isolate three dimensions of cultural items that people can potentially imitate: content, form, and stance.

The first dimension relates mainly to the content of a specific text, referencing to both the ideas and the ideologies conveyed by it. The second dimension relates to form: This is the physical incarnation of the message, perceived through our senses. It includes both visual/audible dimensions specific to certain texts, as well as more complex genre-related patterns organizing them (such as lip-synch or animation). While ideas and their expression have been widely discussed in relation to the meme concept, the third—communication-related dimension—is presented here for the first time. This dimension—which relates to the information memes convey about their own communication—is labeled here as stance. Expanding Englebertson’s (2007) definitions, I use ‘‘stance’’ to depict the ways in which addressers position themselves in relation to the text, its linguistic codes, the addressees, and other potential speakers. Like form and content, stance is potentially memetic; when re-creating a text, users can decide to imitate a certain position that they find appealing or use an utterly different discursive orientation.

Since I use stance in this context as a very broad category, I wish to clarify it by breaking it into three subdimensions, drawing on concepts from discourse and media studies: (1) participation structures -who is entitled to participate and how, as conceptualized by Phillips (1972), (2) keying -- the tone and style of communication, as defined by Goffman (1974) and further developed by Blum-Kulka et al. (2004), and (3) communicative functions, as conceptualized by Roman Jakobson (1960). Jakobson identified six fundamental functions of human communication, concisely presented as follows: (a) Referential communication, which is oriented toward the context, or the ‘‘outside world’’; (b) emotive, oriented toward the addresser and his/her emotions; (c) conative, oriented toward the addressee and available paths of actions (e.g. imperatives); (d) phatic, which serves to establish, prolong, or discontinue communication; (e) metalingual, which is used to establish mutual agreement on the code (for example, a definition); and (f) poetic, focusing on the aesthetic or artistic beauty of the construction of the message itself.

This analytic framework, consistent with the three memetic dimensions (content, form, and stance),
as well as the three subdimensions of the latter dimension (participation structures, keying, and communicative functions) will be developed and applied in the following section to the analysis of a successful YouTube meme, featuring one somewhat upset fan. ...

Explanation in Table 1 page 369.

Nachhilfeunterricht Nr. 5 für AG, LG und OLG München: Internet Memes und Glaube an Grüne Männchen vom Mars

What makes a meme successful? Selection criteria for cultural evolution

Francis HEYLIGHEN - CLEA, Free University of Brussels

To be assimilated, the presented meme must be respectively noticed, understood and accepted by the host. Noticing requires that the meme vehicle be sufficiently salient to attract the host's attention. Understanding means that the host recognizes the meme as something that can be represented in his or her cognitive system. The mind is not a blank slate on which any idea can be impressed. To be understood, a new idea or phenomenon must connect to cognitive structures that are already available to the individual. Finally, a host that has understood a new idea must also be willing to believe it or to take it serious. For example, although you are likely to understand the proposition that your car was built by little green men from Mars, you are unlikely to accept that proposition without very strong evidence. Therefore, you will in general not memorize it, and the meme will not manage to infect you.

Echauffierend! Überall Nazi Propaganda. Wie wärs z.B. mit

Elon Musk: ‘Dang, turns out even Hitler was shorting Tesla stock’

Dang, turns out even Hitler was shorting Tesla stock … https://t.co/RLM1VQ5O3K

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 5, 2018

Es war schon schlimmer. Hitler hasst Rebecca Blacks Song 'Friday'.

Similarly, Deacon (1999) argues:

A meme is a sign: some physical thing which, by virtue of some distinctive feature, can be recruited by an interpretive process within a larger system as re-presenting something else, conveying information into that system and reorganising it with respect to that something else.

(Internet memes as internet signs: A semiotic view of digital culture, Sara Cannizzaro, Lincoln School of Film and Media)


Oder im damaligen aktuellen politischen Bezug in Canada. Selbst wenn man sich von Hitler distanziert, geht das nicht gut bei manchen.

From Hitler memes to 9/11 truthers, Ontario NDP candidate controversies grow as party enters spotlight

As a general rule, any time someone running for public office has to clarify that they don't support Adolf Hitler, it's not going well.

At a news conference attended by B’nai Brith Canada this morning, @GilaMartow and @ToddSmithPC stated that a candidate for the @OntarioNDP has been “caught praising Adolf Hitler online.” #onpoli pic.twitter.com/wlvBrdiMNK

— B'nai Brith Canada (@bnaibrithcanada) May 25, 2018

Schlussendlich J. Habermas:

Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research

Abstract

I first compare the deliberative to the liberal and the republican models of democracy, and consider possible references to empirical research and then examine what empirical evidence there is for the assumption that political deliberation develops a truth‐tracking potential. The main parts of the paper serve to dispel prima facie doubts about the empirical content and the applicability of the communication model of deliberative politics. It moreover highlights 2 critical conditions: mediated political communication in the public sphere can facilitate deliberative legitimation processes in complex societies only if a self‐regulating media system gains independence from its social environments and if anonymous audiences grant a feedback between an informed elite discourse and a responsive civil society.

"Likewise, litigants do not stop going to court, irrespective of what law professors observe and pronounce about the indeterminacy of laws and the unpredictability of legal decisions. The rule of law and the practice of adjudication would break down, were participants not to act on the premise that they receive fair treatment and that a reasonable verdict is passed down."

Hört jemand zu in den Katakomben der Nymphenburger Strasse?! Insbesondere dieser immer noch vorherrschende braune Miefgestank im ersten Stock gleich beim Treppenaufgang.

"“Science is interesting, and if you don't agree you can fuck off."

Hitler addresses ECHR. Debunks Germany’s “criminal sanctioning of use of Nazi symbols” as virtue signalling deflecting from him having been a true Keynesian

This is in reference to the Case 35285/16 and the ECHR's decision in April 2018. There is among others the salient paragraph 47. Fortunately, someone with first hand knowledge and expertise was only too eager to chip in and get a couple of misconceptions straight.

So here is the ECHR live:

  47. In the light of their historical role and experience, States which have experienced the Nazi horrors may be regarded as having a special moral responsibility to distance themselves from the mass atrocities perpetrated by the Nazis (ibid., § 243, with further references). The Court considers that the legislature’s choice to criminally sanction the use of Nazi symbols, to ban the use of such symbols from German political life, to maintain political peace (also taking into account the perception of foreign observers), and to prevent the revival of Nazism (see paragraph 30 above) must be seen against this background. 

Hitler would chuckle but hey, here he is in person, more or less. Let's listen to Dear Leader back then:

'Gents, lady! With all due respect, we, the Nazis, did not gain power via pictures or symbols. There were economical reasons, the nation was being slighted and financially damaged by the Versailles Treaty. Capice. Or in today's terms: 'It's the economy, stupid!'

I did not become top honcho or Hero Number One as they say in India of a country by strutting around with a Gucci label on my handbag. Not only was I a gifted painter, I was a genius in applied economics. Did you gents never appreciate the fact that I was a Keynesian?? Yeah, take that.

"For today’s generation, Hitler is the most hated man in history, and his regime the archetype of political evil. This view does not extend to his economic policies, however. Far from it. They are embraced by governments all around the world. The Glenview State Bank of Chicago, for example, recently praised Hitler’s economics in its monthly newsletter. In doing so, the bank discovered the hazards of praising Keynesian policies in the wrong context."

FYI gents & lady in Strasbourg, this was the situation in our neighbor country Austria.

"As we can see, the budget deficit was radically cut right down until 1936, and was virtually eliminated, since by October 1936 the budget deficit was about 0.5% of GDP (Berger 2003: 90).

Some of the austerity policies included:

(1) the elimination of the works council in 1934;

(2) a series of cuts to welfare, and

(3) slashing of unemployment benefits to the point where only 50% of the unemployed in 1936 received benefits (Obinger 2018: 86).

How did the economy perform under this austerity?

The Austrian economy was awful."

Now watch the difference courtesy me, the Big Kahuna.

"While in Austria, the clerical fascists pursued austerity and wage and price deflation from 1934 to 1937, in Germany the National Socialist government of Hitler implemented a series of economic interventions that involved large government deficits, direct public works programs, and rearmament. This program was undoubtedly Keynesian in its fiscal effects, despite some modern attempts to deny this like Tooze (2008) (on the simulative nature of Germany’s deficits and policies after 1933, see Cohn 1992; Fremdling and Stäglin 2015; Overy 1996). The fact that German military spending was higher by 1935 than some historians have thought does not change the reality that military Keynesianism is still Keynesianism. It is clear that German policy down to 1936 was a mix of military and civilian Keynesian spending.

So how did Austrian unemployment compare to unemployment in Germany?

While Austrian unemployment remained high, German unemployment fell rapidly.

Popular support for the Austro-fascist regime collapsed by 1938 given the economic disasters and high unemployment, and when Hitler annexed Austria in March 1938 there was no doubt a great deal of support for the Anschluss within Austria."

Genius that I am I went ballistic Keynes and boy, was I successful except for some minor hiccups along the road which finally convinced me to put an end to my great life.

"What were those economic policies? He suspended the gold standard, embarked on huge public works programs like Autobahns, protected industry from foreign competition, expanded credit, instituted jobs programs, bullied the private sector on prices and production decisions, vastly expanded the military, enforced capital controls, instituted family planning, penalized smoking, brought about national health care and unemployment insurance, imposed education standards, and eventually ran huge deficits. The Nazi interventionist program was essential to the regime’s rejection of the market economy and its embrace of socialism in one country.

Such programs remain widely praised today, even given their failures. They are features of every “capitalist” democracy. Keynes himself admired the Nazi economic program, writing in the foreword to the German edition to the General Theory: “[T]he theory of output as a whole, which is what the following book purports to provide, is much more easily adapted to the conditions of a totalitarian state, than is the theory of production and distribution of a given output produced under the conditions of free competition and a large measure of laissez-faire.”

You may want to visualize my genius. Well here it is, the Chart of Fiscal Stimulus Beauty courtesy that Brit Ralph Musgrave.

I was working magic

I hear that some ridiculously clad nutball from India had written two letters to me which the British bastards had intercepted. Proves that I had fans the world over. Very well possible he fell for our use of the swastika, I never cared about trademarks and copyright. Honestly, I could have used a violet lily or a pink thong as our party emblem and would still have "won the hearts and minds of my people". Just watch the present political climate the world over.

You may also want to notice that I embrace "a broadly Malthusian or Spencerian vision of populations of humans destined to fight each other: Each nation or race will breed too many people to share the planet".

As for my German countrymen's Criminal Code 86a, gents & lady, that 's virtue signalling. Pure, simple and pathetic virtue signalling.'

Not yet convinced? Here are some very good posts:

Macro-economic policy and votes in the thirties: Germany (and The Netherlands) during the Great Depression

Macroeconomics in Germany: The forgotten lesson of Hjalmar Schacht

Nazi Germany’s Economic Recovery-Schacht’s Triumph and Keynes’ Vindication

The best at last:

Hjalmar Schacht, Mefo Bills and the Restoration of the German Economy 1933-1939

Ludwig Wittgenstein: 'In case you want an Emetic, there it is.’

Neville Chamberlain
"Peace for Our Time," September 30, 1938

The following statement was made by British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, in front of #10 Downing Street, London, after his arrival home from the notorious Munich Conference of 1938:

"(...)

My good friends, for the second time in our history, a British Prime Minister has returned from Germany bringing peace with honor. I believe it is "peace for our time." Go home and get a nice quiet sleep".

. . . . . . .

Wittgenstein sensed a different smell:

In the midst of all this anxiety, the sight of Neville Chamberlain returning from Munich proclaiming ‘Peace in our time’ was too much to bear. He sent Gilbert Pattisson one of the postcards printed to celebrate Chamberlain’s ‘success’. Beneath a picture of Chamberlain and his wife the legend reads: ‘The Pilgrim of Peace. Bravo! Mr Chamberlain.’ On the back Wittgenstein wrote: ‘In case you want an Emetic, there it is.’

(Ray Monk - Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius)

Why/when is showing the Himmler picture illegal in Germany and the Hitler picture is NOT!?

This was the bonus trivia question I asked at the end of the blog post of Sept. 4 about the ECHR decision Case 35285/16 followup.

The hint I gave was the German political party AfD who has managed to make some sizeable inroads into the political landscape in Germany. To the dislike of many in the traditional parties.

The answer is when the image of Hitler has political utility. It is perfectly fine to show him, even in an online youth magazine called 'bento' of the insufferable magazine 'SPIEGEL', to disparage a legal party that happens to be successful in elections and for obvious reasons based on a disastrous German immigration/open borders policy. This is how cheap German journalism works.

NOT forbidden when used in right context

The above pic is probably from the same event as the one used by Bento below.

NOT forbidden according to Hamburg prosecutor.

This was the post on the bento page and that was the reason for me to file a complaint with the Hamburg prosecutor based on this silly reasoning of the Munich prosecutor Weiss about my blog post below.

It reads in English:

Martina Musati, what about Work From Home?

Would you like to agree with Marissa from Yahoo?

Look, dear Miss Martina Musati, we will clarify such images with Nazi symbols before the Supreme Court. The job center will never curtail my right to express my opinion!

Which prosecutor Weiss found to contravene Criminal Code 86a by dishing out this piece of prose:

"Die festgestellte Verwendung und Gestaltung der verfahrensgegenständlichen Bilder unter Verwendung von Symbolen der NS-Gewaltherrschaft lässt vielmehr vielgestaltige Interpretationen zu, auch eine Interpretation, die gerade nicht als Distanzierung anzusehen ist."

"The stated use and design of the procedural images using symbols of the Nazi tyranny rather allows a variety of interpretations, even an interpretation that just can not be regarded as a distancing."

Oh absolutely your Bucolic Highness of Bavarian Law.

When it rains outside it allows for a variety of interpretations. Such as wetness following the path of Newton, even an interpretation that can not be regarded alluding to wetness but rather the absence of dryness.

This is the raw deal bloggers get in Bavaria's Kangaroo Courts.

Now compare this with the reasoning of the Hamburg prosecutor about the Bento post. She really dug into the website, unlike the ECHR, and the result is a measured approach and explanation. Below is the Google translate slightly edited for better understanding.

I wish to add that I find the method of the "journalist" Thomas Hass highly questionable. As a matter of fact, it is despicable journalism.

StA HH vom 20.02.2018

Az. 7101 Js 742/17

...

Mit dem am 14.03.2016 auf der Internetseite des Spiegel-Jugendmagazins „Bento“ veröffentlichten Artikel „Undercover auf Facebook: Was ich auf rechten Hetz-Seiten erlebte", dem ein Foto von Hitler in Uniform mit Hakenkreuzbinde vorangestellt ist, hat sich der Verfasser des Beitrags - der hier Beschuldigte Thomas Hass - nicht wegen Verwendens von Kennzeichen verfassungswmlriger Organisationen (§§ 86 a Abs.1 Nr.1‚ 86 Abs.1 Nr. 4 StGB) strafbar gemacht.

With the on March 14, 2016 on the website of the Spiegel youth magazine "Bento" published article "Undercover on Facebook: What I on right Hetz sides experienced", which is preceded by a photo of Hitler in uniform with swastika bandage, the author of the Contribution - the accused Thomas Hass - is not punishable for the use of trademarks of constitutional organizations (§§ 86a Abs.1 Nr.1, 86 Abs.1 Nr. 4 StGB).

Zwar ist grundsätzlich die öffentliche Darstellung des Hakenkreuzes und anderer Kennzeichen von NS-Organisationen nach § 86 a StGB strafbar, indes entfällt eine Strafbarkeit dann, wenn bereits der Kontext der Verwendung ergibt, dass eine Wirkung auf Dritte in einer dem Symbolgehalt entsprechenden Richtung ausscheidet (Thomas Fischer, StGB, 65. Aufl., RN 18 zu § 86 a StGB). Dies ist hier der Fall.

Although in principle the public representation of the swastika and other marks of Nazi organizations according to § 86 a StGB is punishable, however, criminal liability does not apply if the context of the use already indicates that an effect on third parties in a direction corresponding to the symbolic content is omitted (Thomas Fischer, StGB, 65th ed., RN 18 to § 86 a StGB). This is the case here.

Der gesammte, am 14.03.2016 veröffentlichte Beitrag wurde beigezogen. Inhaltlich setzt sich der Verfasser in diesem mit der Problematik der Veröffentlichung ausländerfeindlicher, Angst und Hass schürender Kommentare auf der Internetplattform, „Facebook“, daraus resultierender „Freundschaften“ und Verbindungen sowie unter diesem Deckmantel gemeinsam betriebener, vom Verfasser so bezeichneter „rechter Hetze" auseinander.

The entire, on 14.03.2016 published contribution was consulted. Contentwise, the author sets out to discuss the problem of publishing xenophobic, fear and hate mongering comments on the Internet platform, "Facebook", resulting "friendships" and connections as well as under this cloak jointly operated, so designated by the author of "right hate".

Zur Erforschung dieses Phänomens hat der Verfasser einen eigenen Facebook-Account einer von ihm frei erfundenen Person - nämlich „Melanie“ - angelegt, um so Reaktionen anderer internet-Nutzer hervorzurufen und nachvollziehen zu können. Die von ihm dabei frei erfundene Nutzerin "Melanie" hasst den lslam und die Bundekanzlerin, insbesondere die von dieser vertretene Flüchtlingspolitik und lost mit von ihr eingestellten Beiträgen und Kommentaren zahlreiche Reaktionen aus, die vom Verfasser im Rahmen des Artikels untersucht und kommentiert werden.

To investigate this phenomenon, the author has created his own Facebook account of a person he invented - namely "Melanie" - in order to be able to evoke and understand the reactions of other Internet users. She hates the lslam and the Chancellor, in particular the refugee policy she represents, and, with her contributions and comments, launches numerous reactions, which the author examines and comments on within the framework of the article.

Dass der Verfasser diesem Artikel ein Bild Hitlers voranstellt, das zudem mit dem sarkastischen Kommentar „Angela, du blöde Kuh, ist das hier deiner Meinung nach die nordische Rasse? Naja, was kann man dazu sagen? Sie ruiniert euer Land....“ versehen ist, kann im gegebenen Zusammenhang nur als plakative Überschrift des Artikels und als ein Beispiel für die von der imaginaren „Melanie" und anderen Internetnutzern verbreiteten Botschaften und Kommentierungen verstanden werden.

That the author prefixed this article with a picture of Hitler, in addition to the sarcastic comment "Angela, you stupid cow, is this, in your opinion, the Nordic race? Well, what can you say about that? It ruins your country .... ", in the given context can only be understood as a catchy phrase and as an example for the messages and comments spread by the imaginary" Melanie "and other Internet users.

Ganz offensichtlich will der Verfasser des Beitrags sich aber von dem von ihm als Hetze beschriebenen Phänomen und dem in diesem Zusammenhang zur Verdeutlichung abgebildeten Bild nebst Kommentar inhaltlich distanzieren.

Obviously, however, the author of the article wants to distance himself from the phenomenon described by him as hate speech and the image and commentary depicted in this context for clarification.

Die Verwendung des Hakenkreuzes läuft damit im gegebenen Zusammenhang für jedermann erkennbar nicht dem Schutzzweck des § 86 a StGB entgegen. Vielmehr soll mit dem vorangestellten Bild gerade der sorglose Umgang mit Kommentaren und Abbildungen in öffentlichen Internetplattformen dargestellt werden, dient die Verwendung des Abbildes von Hitler einschließlich der von ihm getragenen Hakenkreuzbinde daher der bloßen Veranschaulichung und Kritik. Keinesfalls besteht hier daher die Gefahr, dass in der Abbildung im gegebenen Rahmen eine Verherrlichung oder aber auch nur eine gewisse Sympathie für Hitler oder dessen Ideologie gesehen werden kann.

The use of the swastika runs in the given context recognizable for anyone not contrary to the protective purpose of § 86 a StGB. On the contrary, the careless handling of comments and images on public Internet platforms should be portrayed in the preceding picture. Therefore, the use of the image of Hitler, including the swastika binding carried by him, serves as a mere illustration and critique. Therefore, there is no danger here that the picture in the given picture may be regarded as a glorification or even a certain sympathy for Hitler or his ideology.

Nur rein vorsorglich wird darauf hingewiesen, dass selbst wenn man die sich aus dem Kontext ergebende Ablehnung als nicht sofort erkennbar ansehen und daher eine Schutzgutverletzung des § 86 a StGB annehmen würde, eine Strafbarkeit dann aber jedenfalls nach § 86 Abs.3 StGB entfiele, da die Abbildung des in Rede stehenden, mit Kommentaren unterlegten Bildes jedenfalls der staatsbürgerlichen Aufklärung diente.

Only as a precautionary note, it is pointed out that even if you consider the rejection as not immediately recognizable and therefore would accept a protective goods violation of § 86 a StGB, criminal liability then but in any case omitted under § 86 Abs.3 StGB, since the image of the picture in question, which was underlined with commentary, at least served the civic enlightenment.

Nach dem oben Gesagten ist davon auszugehen, dass Ziel des Artikels nebst der dazugehörigen Abbildung die Forderung der politischen Mündigkeit der vermutlich überwiegend jugendlichen Leser war. ZuIässig ist es in einem derartigen Zusammenhang beispielsweise auch, im Rahmen einer umfangreichen, kritischen Dokumentation Verknüpfungen zu ablehnend kommentierten Homepages mit nach § 86 a Abs.1 StGB strafbaren lnhalten anzubringen (Münchener Kommentar zum StGB, 3. Aufl., RN 37 zu § 86 StGB). Dementsprechend ist vorliegend im gegebenen Kontext auch die Abbildung des Hakenkreuzlers in jedem Falle zulässig.

According to the above, it can be assumed that the aim of the article, together with the corresponding figure, was the demand  for political maturity of the presumably predominantly young readers. In such a context, it is also permissible, for example, to include links to negatively commented homepages with content punishable by Section 86a (1) of the Criminal Code (Munich Commentary on the Criminal Code, 3rd ed., RN 37 on Section 86) Criminal Code). Accordingly, in the present context, the image of the swastika is permissible in any case.

Soweit die von Ihnen in Ihrer Anzeige genannte Veröffentlichung eines veränderten Bilds der ehemaligen Geschäftsführerin von Yahoo in NS-Uniform anders bewertet worden ist, war dies hier nicht zu prüfen. Weder sind hier die genauen Umstände bekannt, noch kann dies Auswirkungen auf den hier zu beurteilenden Einzelfall haben.

As far as the publication of a changed image of the former managing director of Yahoo in NS uniform mentioned by you in your announcement was evaluated differently, this was not to be examined here. Neither the exact circumstances are known here, nor can this have any effect on the individual case to be assessed here.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Brümmer
Staatsanwältin

Mrs Brümmer is to be commended for her effort unlike Munich prosecutor Weiss with his sophomoric drivel.

However, I can not help but view the Bento piece as a, typical for German journalism, cheap shot against a controversial party that keeps eating away voters of traditional parties right and left!

Which goes to show, even in death Hitler has utility for bad journalism.

Reading Lounge

1. Taiwan to crowdsource its laws

2. A Dali moment - Metamorphosis of Hitler's Face into a Moonlit Landscape with Accompaniment

3. Elizabeth Warren Has Got It All Wrong about Germany

4. Parrots' economics

5. Markets in everything - today the giraffe

6. Bret, Unbroken

Hitler disappoints again. "Our findings suggest that Hitler’s speeches, while rationally targeted, had a negligible impact on the Nazis’ electoral fortunes."

What a loser. That was probably the reason he finally set an end to his life. Such was life in the Reich.

Examining a Most Likely Case for Strong Campaign Effects: Hitler’s Speeches and the Rise of the Nazi Party, 1927–1933

Abstract

Hitler’s rise to power amidst an unprecedented propaganda campaign initiated scholarly interest in campaign effects. To the surprise of many, empirical studies often found minimal effects. The predominant focus of early work was on U.S. elections, though. Nazi propaganda as the archetypal and, in many ways, most likely case for strong effects has rarely been studied. We collect extensive data about Hitler’s speeches and gauge their impact on voter support at five national elections preceding the dictatorship. We use a semi-parametric difference-in-differences approach to estimate effects in the face of potential confounding due to the deliberate scheduling of events. Our findings suggest that Hitler’s speeches, while rationally targeted, had a negligible impact on the Nazis’ electoral fortunes. Only the 1932 presidential runoff, an election preceded by an extraordinarily short, intense, and one-sided campaign, yielded positive effects. This study questions the importance of charismatic leaders for the success of populist movements.

Reading Lounge

1. Let's not blame Hitler for the Holocaust

2. Most male mammals carry precious cargo in an awfully precarious package. External testicles—which swing delicately outside the abdominal cavity in an exposed, thin-skinned sack ...

3. Amazon delivers in Leh

4. Friedrich Nietzsche: The truth is terrible

5. The brown spot

Also today in 1945. The new Fuhrer

By popular demand and who are we to not dutifully succumb. The History Channel.

 

Still, "Could you give me a Heil Doenitz just so I could say I had one??"

In case some German frigtards take offence, here is my totally awesome disclaimer. Happy now?

Something happened today in 1945. The question needs to be raised: Were the Germans really the Baddies?

To be sure, "Marching under a rats anus I'd be a lot less worried... ".

More here on that historic day.

Some misinterpretations still exist today.

In case some German frigtards take offence, here is my totally awesome disclaimer. Happy now?

Just call Hitler "Heiler", "My chancellor", remove the moustache and, hey, you get around German censorship. Oh, zose Jermans and their double standards.

Hannah Arendt

The trouble with lying and deceiving is that their efficiency depends entirely upon a clear notion of the truth that the liar and deceiver wishes to hide.

Hannah Arendt

Techdirt has a post titled

The Price Wolfenstein 2 Had To Pay To Get Around Germany's Anti-Nazi Laws Was Removing A Mustache

from the yes-that-mustache dept

The last time we talked about Germany's Strafgesetzbuch law, specifically section 86a that prohibits the display of Nazi symbols, iconography, or historical figures with few exceptions, was when Ubisoft accidentally sent the country versions of a South Park video game chock full of swastikas. I feel much the same today about the law as I did then: I get why the law was created, but it's probably time for it to be retired. While the law does make room for Nazi symbols to be displayed for the purposes of art and education, too often those exceptions are either not actually adhered to in real-world examples, while those that might be able to fit their work within those exceptions don't bother trying, too chilled by the law that limits their speech. Coupling that along with the simple fact that German citizens who really want to see Nazi symbols don't have to work particularly hard to circumvent the law resolves the whole matter as being somewhat silly.

And it produces silly results. (full post here)

Newsweek:

In Germany, the game looks a little bit different. Hitler’s iconic mustache—the previously popular toothbrush style that fell out of fashion after the war because of its unshakable association with the brutal Nazi dictator—has been removed, according to a video posted on YouTube by Censored Gaming that compares two versions of the same scene. (Spoiler alert: Elements of the scene will be described in the next paragraph.)

In this particular part of the game, Hitler walks into a casting session of American actors who are auditioning for a part in a Nazi-made film. Not only is his mustache gone, but the insignia on his robe is different. It’s difficult to make out in the video, but according to Kotaku, the German version removes Hitler’s initials. Instead of a black swastika in its usual place at the center of a giant Nazi flag hanging in the background, there’s a warped-triangle symbol. The mustache-less Hitler isn’t calledmein führer in the German version but rather mein kanzler, meaning “my chancellor,” or mein heiler, meaning “my healer.” It also replaces exclamations of Heil Hitler! with chants of mein kanzler.

Polygon

The swastika has been replaced with that made-up, three-pronged symbol that some stateside gamers may have seen in trailers and marketing. Bethesda Softworks has used it rather than develop separate trailers or risk having one with the wrong imagery used over in Europe. (In the past, the use of licensed music has also meant  careful tiptoeing around the presence of Nazi symbology.)

Fans are ripping the bowdlerized dialogue and symbology.

“They should’ve just put a paper bag on his head with ‘Not hitler’ written on it,” said one YouTube commenter.

“They deprived us of a great story by removing the amazing voice acting (both English and German) and replacing it with a low quality dub that changes the narrative into a nonsensical, patronising mess and then having the gall to offer it to us thinking we wouldn't notice these obvious changes,” said one Redditor, who said he is German.

Then there is Kotaku. But back to Polygon where they write:

If Wolfenstein 2: The New Colossus was going to launch in Germany, and it did, some measure of censorship was to be expected. Nazi symbology and references aren’t just frowned upon there, they’re flat illegal.

Except, that they are NOT! They are welcome when they serve a purpose. This here was posted on BENTO, a youth website, of that yellow press, fake news magazine SPIEGEL.

It is an anti AfD post against a political party that managed to garner some 13% of the votes in the elections last September. It would be quite a stretch to call 13% of Germans Nazis. Yet any mud that could be gathered was thrown at them by the press.

Oh, you can even deny the Holocaust with the backing of Germany's Constitutional Court as long as you are in a small group!

Germany's ban on denying the Holocaust is first of all

• an attack on free speech, 
• a hypocritic instrumentalization of history and 
• a convenient cover-up to achieve this:

"Where all are guilty, no one is; confessions of collective guilt are the best possible safeguard against the discovery of culprits, and the very magnitude of the crime the best excuse for doing nothing."

Hannah Arendt

Besides, German tv is chock-full of so-called NS documentaries every week!

Thank you, Mr Harada, for praising my economic genius. It's a gas.

Just call me Adolf Keynes

Japanese central banker praises Hitler's economic policies

Bank of Japan policymaker praised Adolf Hitler's economic policies on Thursday, but said they enabled the Nazi dictator to do "horrible" things to the world.

Yutaka Harada, a member of the board of Japan's central bank, said Western policymakers helped bring Hitler to power by being slow to apply John Maynard Keynes' proposals to fight the Great Depression.

full wisdom here

And now for something real stupid courtesy FAZ. The 'Heil Hitler' greeting as a separation of the private self.

The "Hi Five" bestowing them the power
of divine authority and human dignity.

What would the German media do without Dear Leader Adolf? He just keeps on giving. The Munich SZ had something two weeks ago. I wonder when the SPIEGEL boys will chime in.

Excerpts from the FAZ:

The basic law says hi.

Hitler's greeting was by no means a salutation, but an attack on human dignity. He militarized the self-representation of the individuals and created a magical illusion.

The "German salutation" gave Hitler the power of a divine authority.

The article concludes with a reference to a idiot sociologist ...

Niklas Luhmann came to a different conclusion in his analysis of the fundamental rights: the greeting is part of the human dignity, which is inviolable according to the basic law. When an apparent personal action, such as a greeting placed in an extrinsic manner, the individual must separate his public from the private self or abandon it entirely in favor of the official line. This, according to Luhmann, would be the end of dignity. Perhaps by an occasional "Hi Basic Law", we should recall this by no means self-evident guarantee of freedom.

Why not. I could do now with an Alexander.

The Heil Hitler greeting perverted human communication - a sociologist!

Societies have always been shaped 

more by the nature of the media 

by which men communicate 

than by the content of the communication.

Marshall McLuhan

And now for some real nonsense from the SZ paper courtesy a, yep you had a hunch, a sociologist. He does not disappoint. Forget Auschwitz, forced labor, millions killed to achieve an empire of six years out of a conservatively planned 1,000. The real perversity of Dear Leader Adi was that he twisted a human interpersonal form of daily communication. Boy was he an asshole.

The Hitler greeting perverted human communication

 (Google translate, emphasize mine)

Sociologist Tilman Allert dissects the "German salute" - and thus analyzes the Hitler state in an overwhelming manner.

Review by Robert Probst

"Folks, if you enter, your salutation shall be 'Heil Hitler'!" There were such door signs in NS-Germany and not only in the privacy, the "German greeting" had been decreeed by the party and the state, also in school, in the correspondence, in the public. And the Germans came along.

The greeting community as a community of sentinels is interpreted in a general way when it comes to the millionfold, daily uplift of the right arm, with the hand flattened, up to the eye level in the Nazi state. Or as a forced routine, since any departure from the summer of 1933 was subject to sharp sanctions.

Introducing Dear Leader Adi with gesture control.

However, the often praised study by Tilman Allert on the "history of an ominous gesture" from 2005 , which has now been updated in an updated version , teaches that this is, however, very much more than a stark case of political speech and gesture control (And extended by a chapter of the greeting in the GDR).

The Frankfurt-based sociologist Allert has set out in the tradition of Georg Simmel "to find the totality of his meaning in every detail of life." His aim was to isolate the Hitler-Greeting analytically and thus provide the key to the meaning and functioning of the Nazi dictatorship. Allert achieved this in an impressive way.

Be prepared that sociologist speak may puzzle you.

The meaning of the salutation as a primal form of the social for the coexistence of a society, the penetration of politics into private life, the dismantling of the gesture and the language formula "Heil Hitler" into its individual parts, the integration of the greetings into the "Volksgemeinschaft" by an ever-repeated oath to a charismatic leader - it is worthwhile to recall this again and again, even if sociologist speak demands high concentration.

Hitler deep down was a wicked deformer of traditional communication. Communication so contrary to basic principals like "How are you doing, sucker?"

But the essence of this essay is clearly understandable - and disturbing. Hitler confounded the greetings and thereby deformed the basic principles of human communication and perverted it, writes Allert. This goes far beyond the theory of conformity.

Brace yourself because we are now coming to the sociologist's crescendo. He is about to climax compulsively: the Third Reich mass crimes via greetings!! A sociologist never disappoints.

"Homily Homage to Hitler"

The "universal homage of Hitler" had led to the "blindness towards the present"; A "culture of indifference" and the decline to the "civilizing regression", which ultimately led - in short, to the mass crimes in the Third Reich.

OK, not all did agree with his bullshit but ...

This conclusion has been dared; it was not without contradiction in the first publication. And the historian lacks, of course, the scarcely-founded basis for the encouragement and reach of the Hitler greeting. Still, it is upsetting how the most humane of all gestures could be so collectively and thoroughly directed into the Inhumane and the direction of barbarism.

Oh, absolutely upsetting.

Tilman Allert: The German greeting. Story of an ominous gesture. S. Fischer Verlag, Frankfurt 2017 , updated and extended reprint, 160 pages, 9.99 euros.

What's on German TV? It's Hitler all you can eat.

Hi, I'm Adolf and they love me in Germany.

Germany has a mandatory monthly TV fee. That has to be paid regardless of actually owning a TV or not. You don't pay? Hello, there's prison time if push comes to shove.

With that in mind, let's turn to the programs they air. The German blogger Mister Ede has made the effort to check the generous offering of German state TV in April.

It is Hitler, Hitler and ... did I already mention Hitler?

Based on my own experience, that is basically going on since at least 10 years. I watch TV usually just for the news once a day as German TV is unwatchable. Pro cycling or snooker are exceptions.

These NS films are so called documentaries with a subtle tinge of admiration of the technological and tactical superiority of the Germans seeping through.

So here is a Google translate (unedited, so a little odd at times) of his blog post

"Does ZDFinfo mean Hitler TV?"

What plans ZDF director Thomas Bellut has for ZDFinfo is still unknown. However, there is much evidence that the documentary station of the Second German Television will be under Hitler TV. In terms of content, Bellut has the branch channel At least as much as a glance at the program.

On 27.4. (ZDFinfo / 01:10 clock) and then "Polish campaign: the attack" (ZDFinfo / 01:50 clock). Anyone who wanted to know how the course of the story was going on at the time was not disappointed by the new Nazi broadcaster of ZDF, because "Hitler's Blitzkrieg Teil 2" (ZDFinfo / 02:40), "Hitler's Blitzkrieg Teil 3" (ZDFinfo / 03:25 clock) and "Hitler's Blitzkrieg part 4" (ZDFinfo / 04:10 clock). After so much carnage, the new Hitler TV had a lot of sympathy with the audience and offered something more sensitive and human with "Hitler privat: Der Künstler" (ZDFinfo / 4:55), "Hitler privat: Der Soldat" (ZDFinfo / 05:40 clock) and "Hitler privat: the, leader '" (ZDFinfo / 06:20 clock). Do not ask me now please, why ZDFinfo exaggerated the "leader" in quotes, where a normal mortal with regard to Hitler's landscape paintings probably had the attribute "artist" packed into such. But it was the case, at least the audience had some rest from Adolf from the flickerboard - but only for about 24 hours. Because every viewer of ZDFinfo is given the opportunity to indulge in the past in which a bombing atmosphere prevailed in Europe, all the documentaries just described were simply repeated on the following afternoon. And because Nazi stories are so entertaining, Adolf-Info also sent "Hitler's private: The Warlord" (ZDFinfo / 7:30 pm), "Die Jahreschronik des Dritte Reichs Teil 1" (ZDFinfo / 20:15 (ZDFinfo / 21:45) and "Die Jahreschronik of the Third Reich Part 4" (ZDFinfo / 10:30 pm). And to whom that was not enough, the new Hitler TV offered to the morning hours of the 29.4. (ZDFinfo / 23:15), "The SS: The Power Fight" (ZDFinfo / 00:00), "The SS: Himmler's Wahn" (ZDFinfo / 01: The Nazi Night with " "The SS: The Waffen SS" (ZDFinfo / 02:45), "The SS: Myth Odessa" (ZDFinfo / 03:30), "The SS: Totenkopf" (ZDFinfo / 02:00) "The Atlantean Battle: Hunters and the Hunted" (ZDFinfo / 04:15) and "The Atlantean Battle: Graves of Steel" (ZDFinfo / 04:45).
But whoever now believes that these three days and nights were an exception, is deceptive. Thus broadcast ZDFnazi already on 26.4. The lovingly made real estate document "From fortresses and guide bunkers" (ZDFinfo / 22:25 clock) and on 30.4. Followed "The Nazi Secret of the Toplitzsee" (ZDFinfo / 01:20) and "Himmler's search for Atlantis" (ZDFinfo / 02:05 clock).

Now times Tacheles: Such a shipment composition is not publicly legal, but simply ill. For that too Reich radio posts To pay for radio broadcasts is a question. This is due to the fact that information on public law can not be used to justify such an election. Hours of Hitler's stories, and no documentary in the midst of the horrific expulsion and murder of Jewish people or, for example, euthanasia, the Third Reich can, of course, be transfigured.
If it is Bellut but simply to the compared with other shows slightly better ratings with Nazi-Dokus, then he should be run on ZDFinfo at night porn and sell this as enlightenment television.
In this respect, I would already be pleased to hear from the leadership headquarters of the Third Reich Television on the Obersalzberg - um, of course I am from the Directorate of the Second German Television on the Mainzer Lerchenberg. Even better I would, however, if the ZDF such a one-sided program designs would simply be omitted.

List of the Nazi-Dokus on ZDFinfo from 26. - 30.04.2017:

26.4.2017 - Broadcasts and broadcasting times according to ZDF-Mediathek
From fortresses and guide bunkers - ZDFinfo / 22:25 hrs

27.4.2017 - Broadcasts and broadcasts according to ZDF-Mediathek
Polish campaign: The nerve war - ZDFinfo / 01:10 clock
Polish campaign: The attack - ZDFinfo / 01:50 clock
Hitler's Blitzkrieg (2) - ZDFinfo / 02:40 h
Hitler's Blitzkrieg (3) - ZDFinfo / 03:25 h
Hitler's Blitzkrieg (4) - ZDFinfo / 04:10 clock
Hitler private: The artist - ZDFinfo / 04:55 h
Hitler private: The soldier - ZDFinfo / 05:40 clock
Hitler private: The "guide" - ZDFinfo / 06:20 clock

28.4.2017 - Shows and broadcasts online according to TVMovie online
Polish campaign: The nerve war - ZDFinfo / 13:30 clock
Polish campaign: The raid - ZDFinfo / 2:15 pm
Hitler's Blitzkrieg (2) - ZDFinfo / 3 pm
Hitler's Blitzkrieg (3) - ZDFinfo / 15:45 clock
Hitler's Blitzkrieg (4) - ZDFinfo / 4:30 pm
Hitler private: The artist - ZDFinfo / 17:15 hrs
Hitler private: The soldier - ZDFinfo / 6 pm
Hitler private: The "Führer" - ZDFinfo / 18:45 clock
Hitler private: The Warlord - ZDFinfo / 7:30 pm
The Chronicles of the Third Reich (1) - ZDFinfo / 20:15 Uhr
The Jahrschronik of the Third Reich (2) - ZDFinfo / 21:00 clock
The Chronicles of the Third Reich (3) - ZDFinfo / 21:45 Uhr
The Jahrschronik of the Third Reich (4) - ZDFinfo / 22:30 clock
The SS: Heydrich's rule - ZDFinfo / 23:15 clock

29.04.2017 - Broadcasts and broadcasting times according to TVMovie online
The SS: The Power Fight - ZDFinfo / 00:00 clock
The SS: Himmlers Wahn - ZDFinfo / 01:15 hrs
The SS: Totenkopf - ZDFinfo / 02:00 clock
The SS: The Waffen-SS - ZDFinfo / 02:45 clock
The SS: Myth Odessa - ZDFinfo / 03:30 clock
The Atlantean Battle: Hunters and Hunted - ZDFinfo / 04:15 Uhr
The Atlantean Battle: Graves of Steel - ZDFinfo / 04:45 Uhr

30.04.2017 - Broadcasts and broadcasts according to ZDF-Mediathek
The Nazi secret of the Toplitzsee - ZDFinfo / 01:20 Uhr
Himmlers search for Atlantis - ZDFinfo / 02:05 clock

Wo war die Sufragette der Zensur und Jobcenter München Geschäftsführerin Martina Musati, als RTL den Hitler Film zeigte?

Arbeitsministerin Nahles,

Ich bin bestürzt ob der nachlässigen Handhabung eines die innere Sicherheit der Bundesrepublik betreffenden Umstandes durch die Geschäftsführerin des Jobcenter München Martina Musati, also einer Behörde, die Ihnen unterstellt ist.

Wie kann es dieser Sufragette der Internet-Zensur für Hartz IV Empfänger Martina Musati entgehen, dass im Lande der Reichs-Propaganda-Zwangsabgabe im bundesdeutschen TV ein Epos über diesen Mann mit dem ridikülen Schnäuzer zu bester Sendezeit gegeben wurde?

Zu Ihrer Erinnerung sendete RTL II am 03. April 2015 um 20:15 Uhr das Epos 'Hitler - Aufstieg des Bösen'.

Zu sehen gab es dort diese beklagenswerten Bilder, die jedem, der an sachgerechter und effektiver Zensur interessiert ist, die Achselhaare aufstellen muss.

Hitler in 'Aufstieg des Bösen'

Hitler in 'Aufstieg des Bösen' 2

RTL II 'Aufstieg des Bösen'

Hitler in 'Aufstieg des Bösen' 3

Das wachsame, der zensorisch geschulten und jeder Kritik abholden und elokutionsinhibierten 30%igen Quoten-Mam'selle Martina Musati, Auge scheint in typisch weiblicher Schwäche der Willkür wieder einmal verfallen zu sein. 

Selbige Wachsamkeit fand ihre, mit der für diese Behörde so geschäftsnotwendige als auch intrinsischen Primitivität,  gelungene Exekution in zwei Anzeigen durch eben jene GF Martina Musati gegen mich wegen ebensolcher Bilder bei der Justiz, die sich insbesondere durch fünf selbstredende Exemplarien der Heruntergekommenheit und Korruptheit auszeichnet:

• die Vertuschung der Täterschaft des Oktoberfest-Attentates
• der Mollath Skandal
• der Hoeness Whitewash
• das NSU Simulacrum
• der Versuch, gestohlene Nazi Kunst zu verheimlichen

Das ist der Sumpf, in dem sich diese Erpresserin und GF des Jobcenter München wohl fühlt und dies ist der juristische Sumpf, der diese heruntergekommene Behördenperson deckt und nicht wegen Erpressung strafverfolgt. Also ein Mitglied einer Behörde eines Landes, das tatsächlich so vermessen ist, sich als Immigrationsland zu prostituieren ungeachtet der offenkundigen Aversion des Deutschen Fremden gegenüber. (1) Eines Rassistenlandes, dessen drittklassige und lächerliche Vorzeige-Ökonomen Ausländer nach ihren Kostenfaktoren evaluieren.

____________________
(1) Heisst nicht ein 'Bed 'n Breakfast' in Deutschland 'Fremdenzimmer'?!