Exclusive '2019 German Parliamentary Fashion' in Berlin
Three models present trendy line of smart yet casual-sophisticated suits in an austerity-friendly wool/polyester blend.
The 2019 women prefer an audacious color mix with a decided tinge of Scottish highland nostalgia, complemented by politically correct cotton tights and rounded off with a slightly rumpled jacket.
"The euro is not in the German national interest, but we need friends." - Helmut Kohl to US Sec. of State James Baker on Dec. 12, 1989
11/10/2018
11/09/2018
11/08/2018
Bill Mitchell answers that post about 'Monetary Sovereignty' from the UK
11/05/2018
The Intergenerational Mobility of Immigrants and the Native-Born: Evidence from Sweden
Abstract
We use administrative Swedish data to show that, conditional on parent income, immigrant children have similar incomes and higher educational attainment in adulthood than native-born Swedes. This result, however, masks the fact that immigrant children born into poor families are more likely than similar natives to both reach the top of the income distribution and to stay at the bottom. Immigrant children from high-income families are also more likely than natives to regress to the economic bottom. Notably, however, children from predominantly-refugee sending countries like Bosnia, Syria, and Iran have higher intergenerational mobility than the average immigrant child in Sweden.
Conclusion
We use administrative Swedish data to document that, conditional on parent income, immigrant children have similar incomes to their native-born counterparts. Digging deeper into the conditional expectation, we reveal that immigrant children born into poor families are slightly more likely than native children born into poor families to reach the very top of the income distribution. They are also considerably more likely to obtain a college degree. At the same time, immigrant children are also more likely than native children to stay at the very bottom of the income distribution or to regress from middle and high family incomes to the very bottom.
We show, additionally, that substantial heterogeneities in later-life child outcomes exist depending on the country of origin. Children from predominantly-refugee sending countries like Bosnia, Syria, and Iran have higher incomes and higher intergenerational mobility than the average child immigrant to Sweden. Further research is needed to understand what helps the average immigrant child born into the bottom of the income distribution do as well as native children, why immigrant children who arrive at middle and high family incomes are more likely than native children to fall back to the economic bottom, and why some refugee children integrate better into Swedish society than other immigrant children.
We use administrative Swedish data to show that, conditional on parent income, immigrant children have similar incomes and higher educational attainment in adulthood than native-born Swedes. This result, however, masks the fact that immigrant children born into poor families are more likely than similar natives to both reach the top of the income distribution and to stay at the bottom. Immigrant children from high-income families are also more likely than natives to regress to the economic bottom. Notably, however, children from predominantly-refugee sending countries like Bosnia, Syria, and Iran have higher intergenerational mobility than the average immigrant child in Sweden.
Conclusion
We use administrative Swedish data to document that, conditional on parent income, immigrant children have similar incomes to their native-born counterparts. Digging deeper into the conditional expectation, we reveal that immigrant children born into poor families are slightly more likely than native children born into poor families to reach the very top of the income distribution. They are also considerably more likely to obtain a college degree. At the same time, immigrant children are also more likely than native children to stay at the very bottom of the income distribution or to regress from middle and high family incomes to the very bottom.
We show, additionally, that substantial heterogeneities in later-life child outcomes exist depending on the country of origin. Children from predominantly-refugee sending countries like Bosnia, Syria, and Iran have higher incomes and higher intergenerational mobility than the average child immigrant to Sweden. Further research is needed to understand what helps the average immigrant child born into the bottom of the income distribution do as well as native children, why immigrant children who arrive at middle and high family incomes are more likely than native children to fall back to the economic bottom, and why some refugee children integrate better into Swedish society than other immigrant children.
Reading Lounge
1. The Philosophy of Hayao Miyazaki: A Video Essay on How the Traditional Japanese Religion Shinto Suffuses Miyazaki’s Films
2. The Beginning of a New Era in the Online Degree Market
3. Sugar daddy: human capital investment and the university-based supply of ‘romantic arrangements’
4. She started her own archive of smells: 7,000 vacuum-sealed steel cans arranged in rows, containing cake, dirty socks and ice cubes.
5. China's thirst for sand
6. Building the World’s Art Factory
2. The Beginning of a New Era in the Online Degree Market
3. Sugar daddy: human capital investment and the university-based supply of ‘romantic arrangements’
4. She started her own archive of smells: 7,000 vacuum-sealed steel cans arranged in rows, containing cake, dirty socks and ice cubes.
5. China's thirst for sand
6. Building the World’s Art Factory
11/04/2018
Need a lawyer? Take a woman. Here is why
Women Act More Ethically Than Men When Representing Themselves — But Not When Representing Others
As "Snoopy" Miller said: "You know, in a situation like this, there's a high potentiality for the common motherfucker to bitch out." So having good representation is essential.
The paper is here
“I won't let you down:” Personal ethical lapses arising from women’s advocating for others
Highlights
Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others.
In the Afternoon, the Moral Slope Gets Slipperier
As "Snoopy" Miller said: "You know, in a situation like this, there's a high potentiality for the common motherfucker to bitch out." So having good representation is essential.
Research tells us a lot about why people behave unethically. For example, there is evidence that people tend to be more dishonest later in the day, because they’re more fatigued, and when they’re anxious, because they’re more likely to look out for themselves. Many of these studies, however, ... (it is copyrighted, blimey)More here
The paper is here
“I won't let you down:” Personal ethical lapses arising from women’s advocating for others
Highlights
- Women's personal ethics are compromised when representing others instrategic interactions.
- Women’s ethical behavior in strategic interacyions is driven by anticipatory guilt due to social considerations.
- Women's ethhical behavior when advocating for others reflects the presumed ethical preferences of their constituents rather than their personal ethics.
Abstract
The current research examines whether women’s personal ethics are compromised when representing others in strategic interactions. Across five studies (n = 1337), we demonstrate that women’s ethical choices are more sensitive to whether they are representing themselves versus advocating for others compared to men’s ethical choices. We find that other-advocating women are more deceptive than self-advocating women, whereas men are just as likely to engage in morally questionable behaviors when representing themselves or others. We further show that women’s unethical behavior is driven by their anticipatory guilt as they seek to not let their constituents down in an advocacy role. Relative to men, women’s ethical behavior when advocating on behalf of others is especially likely to reflect the presumed ethical preferences of their constituents rather than solely a reflection of their own ethical preferences. Given women’s relatively high personal ethics, these results establish a risk to adopting an advocacy role for women: the social considerations inherent to advocacy put pressure on women to engage in deceptive behaviors that compromise their personal ethics.Seems quite a crowded field of research.
Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others.
Abstract
The authors propose that gender differences in negotiations reflect women’s contextually contingent impression management strategies. They argue that the same behavior, bargaining assertively, is construed as congruent with female gender roles in some contexts yet incongruent in other contexts. Further, women take this contextual variation into account, adjusting their bargaining behavior to manage social impressions. A particularly important contextual variable is advocacy—whether bargaining on one’s own behalf versus on another’s behalf. In self-advocacy contexts, women anticipate that assertiveness will evoke incongruity evaluations, negative attributions, and subsequent “backlash”; hence, women hedge their assertiveness, using fewer competing tactics and obtaining lower outcomes. However, in other-advocacy contexts, women achieve better outcomes as they do not expect incongruity evaluations or engage in hedging. In a controlled laboratory experiment, the authors found that gender interacts with advocacy context in this way to determine negotiation style and outcomes. Additionally, process measures of anticipated attributions and backlash statistically mediated this interaction effect. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)Anxious, threatened, and also unethical: How anxiety makes individuals feel threatened and commit unethical acts.
Abstract
People often experience anxiety in the workplace. Across 6 studies, we show that anxiety, both induced and measured, can lead to self-interested unethical behavior. In Studies 1 and 2, we find that compared with individuals in a neutral state, anxious individuals are more willing (a) to participate in unethical actions in hypothetical scenarios and (b) to engage in more cheating to make money in situations that require truthful self-reports. In Studies 3 and 4, we explore the psychological mechanism underlying unethical behaviors when experiencing anxiety. We suggest and find that anxiety increases threat perception, which, in turn, results in self-interested unethical behaviors. Study 5 shows that, relative to participants in the neutral condition, anxious individuals find their own unethical actions to be less problematic than similar actions of others. In Study 6, data from subordinate–supervisor dyads demonstrate that experienced anxiety at work is positively related with experienced threat and unethical behavior. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)And one advice at last, avoid people in the afternoon. Unless something wicked this way comes.
In the Afternoon, the Moral Slope Gets Slipperier
Labels:
Advocacy,
Anticipatory guilt,
Ethics,
Gender,
Negotiation
Abonnieren
Posts (Atom)
